Why the Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission policy on safety nets and risk assessment is wrong

Journal of Navigation

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 231-243

  Brooker, Peter ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ATC; ATM; Eurocontrol; Safety Regulation Commission

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 2442574026     PISSN: 03734633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463304002735     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BASI (1991). Limitations of the See-and-Avoid Principle. Australian Department of Transport and Communications.
2. Baumgartner, M. (2003). One safe sky for Europe - A revolution in European ATM. The Controller, July, 8-12.
3. Brooker, P. (2002). Future Air Traffic Management: Quantitative En Route Safety Assessment Part 1 - Review of Present Methods; Part 2 - New Approaches. This Journal, 55, 197-211 and 363-379.
4. Brooker, P. and Ingham, T. (1977). Target Levels of Safety for Controlled Airspace. CAA Paper 77002, CAA, London.
5. DNV (2003). Safety Assessment of P-RNAV Route Spacing and Aircraft Separation Final Report. TRS 052/01 for Eurocontrol Job No. C321556 Revision 1, April.
6. Eurocontrol (2003). P-RNAV Route Spacing Simulations. Tampere, Finland, 14-18 October 2002 Simulation. TARA/23, IP.
7. Eurocontrol SRC (2000). Risk Assessment and Mitigation in ATM. Eurocontrol Safety Regulatory Requirement ESARR 4. Edition 1.0, Eurocontrol, Brussels.
8. Eurocontrol SRC (2003). SRC Policy 2: Use of Safety Nets in Risk Assessment & Mitigation in ATM. Edition: 1.0. dated 28 April.
9. FAA/Eurocontrol (1998). A Concept Paper for Separation Safety Modeling: An FAA/Eurocontrol Cooperative Effort on Air Traffic Modeling for Separation Standards.
10. Harrison, D. and Moek, G. (1992). European Studies to Investigate the Feasibility of using 1000 ft Vertical Separation Minima above FL 290: Part II - Precision Data Analysis and Collision Risk Assessment. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 45, 91-106.
11. ICAO (1976). Methodology for the Derivation of Separation Minima Applied to the Spacing between Parallel Tracks in ATS Route Structures. ICAO Circular 120-AN/89/2. Second Edition.
12. ICAO (1998). Manual on Airspace Planning Methodology for the Determination of Separation Minima. ICAO Doc 9689-AN/953.
13. Maurino, D. E., Reason, J., Johnston, N. and Lee, R. B. (1995). Beyond Aviation Human Factors. Ashgate Publishing. Aldershot, UK.
14. Moore, S. M. (1998). Comparison of Alerted and Visually Acquired Airborne Aircraft in a Complex Air Traffic Environment. Proceedings of the 1998 Advances in Aviation Safety Conference, SAE/P-321, 981205, Daytona Beach, Florida, April 6-8, 1998. SAE.
15. Profit, R. (1995). Systematic Safety Management in the Air Traffic Services. Euromoney, London.
16. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. RGCSP [Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel](1995). Working Group A Meeting: Summary of Discussions and Conclusions, ICAO.
18. Shakarian, A. and Haraldsdottir, A. (2001). Required Total System Performance and Results of a Short Term conflict Alert Simulation Study. 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar.
19. Sharpe, A. G. (1991). Application of the 5 nm radar standard separation at ranges up to 160 nm from Claxby, Debden and Pease Pottage SSRs. CAA Paper 91013. Civil Aviation Authority, London.
20. UK Airprox Board (2003). Analysis of Airprox in UK Airspace. Twice-yearly series of Reports.
21. Wickens, C. D. and Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Addison Wesley, Longman, New York.