Prioritizing selection of new elements: On the time course of the preview effect

Visual Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1373-1385

  Donk, Mieke ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PREVIEW EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 27744523357     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000742     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A.F. (in press). Prioritization by transients in visual search: Evidence against the visual marking account of the preview benefit. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
2. Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 213-237.
3. Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hodsoll, J. (2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 758-778.
4. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
5. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(8), 1231-1242.
6. Donk, M., & Verburg, R. C. (2004). Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 282-288.
7. Humphreys, G. W., Jung-Stalmann, B., & Olivers, C.N.L. (2004). An analysis of the time-course of visual marking using a probe dot procedure. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 713-730.
8. Ives, H. E. (1912). Studies of the photometry of different colours: I. Spectral luminosity curves obtained by equality of brightness photometer and the flicker photometer under similar conditions. Philosophical Magazine, 24, 149-188.
9. Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 717-730.
10. Jiang, Y., & Wang, S.W. (2004). What kind of memory supports visual marking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 79-91.
11. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
12. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003a). Visual change with moving displays: More evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 779-792.
13. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003b). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, 181-185.
14. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Watson, D. G. (2003c). When a reappearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 185-198.
15. Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69, 129-155.
16. Müller, H. J., & Rabbit, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
17. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22-42.
18. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42.
19. Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations versus feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 679-715.
20. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
21. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806.
22. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 130-134.
23. Watson, D. G. (2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 74-84.
24. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
25. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature based attentional inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962.
26. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Segmentation on the basis of linear and local rotational motion: Motion grouping in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 70-82.
27. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
28. Wright, R. D., & Richard, C. M. (2003). Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 925-938.
29. Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107.
30. Yantis, S., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812-825.
31. Yantis, S., & Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 166-178.
32. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.
33. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121-134.