The suitability of Goldberg's Big Five IPIP personality markers in New Zealand: A dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity evaluation

New Zealand Journal of Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 86-96

  Guenole, Nigel ^a   Charnyshenko, Oleksandr S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745830612     PISSN: 0112109X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 705, 411-423.
2. Barrick, M. and Mount, M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-25
3. Barrick, M. R., and Mount., M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). The FFM personality dimensions and Job performance: Meta-Analysis of Meta-Analyses. Invited submission to a special "selection," issue of International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5. Black, J. (2000). Personality testing and police selection: Utility of the 'Big Five'. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29(1), 2-9.
6. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515-524.
7. Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
8. Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different spurious evidence formultidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467-477.
9. Byrne (1998) Structural Equation Modeling With Lisrel, Prelis, and Simplis: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Multivariate Applications Book Series) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Camilli, G. & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Caprara, G. V., Caprara, M., & Steca, P. (2003). Personality's correlates of adult development and aging. European Psychologist, 8, 131-147.
12. Catell, R. B. (1947). Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors. Psychometrika, 12, 197-220.
13. th annual conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists. Orlando, Fl.
14. Costa, P. T., Teracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender Differences in Personality Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
15. th annual conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists. Orlando, F1.
16. Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25-36.
17. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-Order Factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 6, 1246-1256.
18. Drasgow, F. (1987). Study of the Measurement Bias of Two Standardized Psychological Tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 1, 19-29.
19. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of Personality: 16, 5, or 3? - Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
20. Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
21. Feldman, J., & Lynch, I. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 421-435.
22. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116. 429-456.
23. Gelatley, I. R., and Paunonen., S. V., Meyer, J. P., Jackson, D. N., & Goffin, R. D. (1991). Personality, vocational interest, and cognitive predictors of managerial job performance and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 221-231.
24. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits. American Psychologist, 48, 1, 26-34.
25. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "Description of personality,": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
26. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). Abroad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 7. (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
27. Goldberg, L. R. (in press). The comparative validity of adult personality inventories: Applications of a consumer-testing framework. In S. R. Briggs, J. M. Cheek, & E. M. Donahue (Eds.), Handbook of Adult Personality Inventories. New York: Plenum.
28. Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. 1991. General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 110-128.
29. Harrison, D.A., McLaughlin, M.E., & Coalter, T.M. (1996). Context, cognition, and common method variance: psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 246-265.
30. Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., & Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 2, 268-279.
31. Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, Fl: Academic Press.
32. Hough, L. & Ones, D. (2001). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In Anderson, D.S. Ones, K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology. Sage Publications.
33. Hough, L. M. (1998). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In M.D. Hakel (Ed.), Beyond Multiple Choice: Evaluating Alternatives to Traditional Testing for Selection (pp. 131-166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Hulin, C.L., & Judge, T.A. 2003. Job attitudes. In Borman, W.C., Ilgen, D.R., & Klimoski, R.J. (Eds.) Handbook of Psychology, Volume 12 (pp. 255-276). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Joreskog, K. & Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL 6: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least square methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
36. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User 's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
37. Judge, T. A., and Bono., J. E., & Locke, E. A. 2000. Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.
38. McCrae, R. R., and Zonderman., M. H., Bond, M. H., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating Replicability of Factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory Factor Analysis versus Procrustes Rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
39. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 17-40.
40. Motowidlo, S. J., Van Scotter, J. R., (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 4, 475-480.
41. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998) Gender, Age, and Race Differences on Overt Integrity Tests: Results Across Four Large-Scale Job Applicant Data Sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 1, 35-42.
42. Raju, N. S., and Lafitte., L. J., & Byrne, B. M. (2002) Measurement Equivalence: A Comparison of Methods Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 3, 517-529.
43. Reise, S. P., and Widaman., K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
44. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2003). The structure of personality attributes. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 1-29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter J. E. (1998). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 2, 262-274.
46. Sorbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
47. Stanton, J. M., and Balzer., W. K., Smith, P. C, Parra, L. F., & Ironson, G. (2001). A General Measure of Work Stress: The Stress in General Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 5, 866-887.
48. Stark, S., Chernyshenko. O., Chan, K., Lee, W., & Drasgow, F. (2001). Effects of the Testing Situation on Item Responding: Cause for Concern. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 5, 943-953.
49. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O., & Drasgow, F. (2004). Examining the effects of differential item functioning and differential test functioning on selection decisions: When are statistically significant effects practically important? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 3, 497-508.
50. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O., & Drasgow, F, (In review). Are CFA and IRT Equally Viable Methods for Detecting Biased Items? Toward a Unified Strategy for DIF Detection. Journal of Applied Psychology.
51. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 173-180.
52. Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1984). Structures of Psychological Distress: Testing confirmatory hierarchical models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 719-721.