School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom?

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 577-601

  Elacqua, Gregory ^a   Schneider, Mark ^b   Buckley, Jack ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ADOLFO IBÁÑEZ   (Chile)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745801612     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20192     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Antil, L., Jenkins, J., Wayne, S., & Vadasy, P. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419-454.
2. Armor, D., & Peiser, B. (1998). Interdistrict choice in Massachusetts. In P. E. Peterson & B. C. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
3. Ascher, C., Fruchter, N., & Berne, R. (1996). Hard lessons: Public schools and privatization. New York: Twentieth Century School Fund.
4. Bonilla-Silva, E. (1996). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62, 445-480.
5. Bridge, G., & Blackman, J. (1978). A study of alternatives in American education (Vol. 4). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
6. Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133-144.
7. Carnegie Foundation. (1992). School choice. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8. Carnoy, M., & McEwan, P. J. (2003). Does privatization improve education? The case of Chile's national voucher plan. In D. Plank & G. Sykes (Eds.), Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Centra de Estudios Públicos. (1997). Educación en Chile: Que piensan los padres. Santiago, Chile.
10. Cook, P., & Ludwig, J. (1998). The burden of "acting white": Do black adolescents disparage academic achievement? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
11. Elacqua, G. (2005). How do for-profit schools respond to voucher funding? Evidence from Chile. Escuela de Gobierno, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez.
12. Elacqua, G., & Fabrega, R. (forthcoming). El consumidor de la educación: El actor olvidado de la libre elección de escuelas en Chile. In S. Cueto (Ed.), Uso e impacto de la información educativa en América Latina. Santiago, Chile: PREAL.
13. Epple, D., Figlio, D., & Romano, R. (2004). Competition between public and private schools: Testing stratification and pricing predictions. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1215-1245.
14. Epple, D., & Romano, R. (1998). Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects. American Economic Review, 88, 33-62.
15. Espinola, V. (1993). The educational reform of the military regime in Chile: The system's response to competition, choice, and market relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
16. Fiske, E., & Ladd, H. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
17. Fossey, R. (1994). Open enrollment in Massachusetts: Why families choose. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 320-334.
18. Gauri, V. (1998). School choice in Chile: Two decades of educational reform. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
19. Glazerman, S. (1998). School quality and social stratification: The determinants and consequences of parental school choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
20. Goldring, E. B., & Shapira, R. (1993). Choice, empowerment, and involvement: What satisfies parents? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 396-409.
21. Gonzalez, P., Mizala, A., & Romaguera, P. (2004). Vouchers, inequalities, and the Chilean experience. National Center for Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, Occasional Paper Series No. 94.
22. Greene, J. P., Howell, W. G., & Peterson, P. E. (1998). Lessons from the Cleveland Scholarship Program. In P. E. Peterson & B. C. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
23. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, S. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326-354.
25. Hanushek, E., Kain, J., Markman, J., & Rivkin, S. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527-544.
26. Henig, J. (1996). The local dynamics of choice: Ethnic preferences and institutional responses. In B. Fuller, R. F. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Henig, J. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Hoxby, C. (2000a). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90, 1209-1238.
29. Hoxby, C. (2000b). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. Working Paper No. 7867. Retrieved December 2005, from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w7867.
30. Hsieh, C. T., & Urquiola, M. (forthcoming). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile's school voucher program. Journal of Public Economics.
31. Jellison, J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177-205.
32. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347-361.
33. Kleitz, B., Weiher, G., Tedin, K., & Matland, R. (2000). Choices, charter schools, and household preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 846-854.
34. Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (1997). The effect of school choice on residential location on the racial segregation of K-12 students. Unpublished manuscript.
35. LaPiere, R. (1938). The sociological significance of measurable attitudes. American Sociological Review, 3, 175-182.
36. Larranaga, O. (2005). Focalización de programas en Chile: El sistema CAS. Serie de Documentes de Discusión sobre la Protección Social. Retrieved December 2005, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/0528Spanish.pdf.
37. Levin, H. (1989). The theory of choice applied to education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education.
38. Levin, H. (1998). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 373-392.
39. Liao, T. F. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
40. McEwan, P. (2003). Peer effects on student achievement: Evidence from Chile. Economics of Education Review, 22, 131-141.
41. McMaster, K., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of students with learning disabilities: An update of Tateyama-Sniezek's review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 107-117.
42. Michel, L., & Rothstein, R. (2002). The class size debate. Washington DC: The Economic Policy Institute.
43. Ministry of Education. (2002). SIMCE: Encuesta a los padres y apoderados. Santiago, Chile.
44. Ministry of Education. (2003). SIMCE: Encuesta a los padres y apoderados. Santiago, Chile.
45. Moe, T. (1995). Private vouchers. In T. Moe (Ed.), Private vouchers (pp. 1-40). Stanford: Hoover Institute Press.
46. Núñez, J., & Gutierrez, R. (2004). Classism, discrimination, and meritocracy in the labor market: The case of Chile. Universidad de Chile. Serie Documentes de Trabajo No. 208 April.
47. OECD. (2004). Revisión de políticas nacionales de educación: Chile. Paris: OECD.
48. Orfield, G. (1995). Public opinion and schools desegregation. Teachers College Record, 96, 655-670.
49. Plank, D., & Sykes, G. (2003). Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Ravitch, D. (1996, October 1). The facts about Catholic education. The Wall Street Journal, p. 22.
51. Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of "broken windows." Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319-342.
52. Saporito, S. (2003). Private choices and public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181-203.
53. Saporito, S., & Lareau, A. (1999). School selection as a process: The multiple dimensions of race in framing educational choice. Social Problems, 46, 418-435.
54. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Schneider, M., Teske, P., Roch, C., & Marschall, M. (1997). Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of public school choice. The American Journal of Political Science, 91(1), 82-93.
56. Slavin, R. (1996). Education for all. Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
57. Smith, K., & Meier, K. (1995). Public choice in education: Markets and the demand for quality education. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 329-343.
58. Sugarman, S. (1999). School choice and public funding. In S. Sugarman & F. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy, and law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
59. Tateyama-Sniezek, K. (1990). Cooperative learning: Does it improve the academic achievement of students with handicaps? Exceptional Children, 56, 426.
60. Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with trade-offs: Psychological constraints and political implications. In A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, & S. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality. London: Cambridge University Press.
61. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2000). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Cambridge, MA.
62. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
63. Valenzuela, J. P. (1997). Descentralización Fiscal: Los ingresos municipales y regionales en Chile. Política Fiscal Series, ECLAC. Retrieved December 2005, from http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/DesarrolloEconomico/6/LCL1086/LCL1087e.pdf.
64. Viadero, D. (2001). Research: Smaller is better. Education Week, November 28.
65. Weiher, G. R., & Tedin, K. L. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1), 79-92.
66. Wells, A. S. (1996). African-American students' view of school choice. In B. Fuller & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? New York: Teachers College Press.
67. Willms, J. D. (1996). School choice and community segregation: Findings from Scotland. In A. Kerckhoff (Ed.), Generating social stratification: Toward a new research agenda. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
68. Wolf, P., & Macedo, S. (2004). Educating citizens. International perspectives on civic values and school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
69. Zimmer, R. W., & Toma, E. F. (2000). Peer effects in private and public schools across countries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 75-92.