Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 749-760

  Ferdig, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; EDUCATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; TEACHING;

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES; INNOVATION IMPLEMENTATION; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; THREE-PART MODELS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745742295     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00559.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agostino, A. (1999). The relevance of media as artifact: technology situated in context. Educational Technology & Society, 2, 4.
2. Batson, T. (1993). The origins of ENFI. In B. C. Bruce, J. K. Peyton & T. Batson (Eds), Networkbased classrooms: promises and realities (pp. 8 7-112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Becker, H. J. & Riel, M. M. (1999). Teacher professionalism and the emergence of constructivist-compatible pedagogies, Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
4. Berrien, C. I. S. D. (1998). Instructional technology across the curriculum. Berrien Springs, MI: Berrien County Intermediate School District.
5. Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W. & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: how collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 5, 539-552.
6. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 2, 141-178.
7. Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23, 8, 4-12.
8. Bruner, J. (1996). Culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Chaney-Cullen, T. & Duffy, T. M. (1999). Strategic teaching framework: multimedia to support teacher change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 1, 1-40.
10. Cliff, C. & Miller, S. (1997). Multicultural dialogue in literature-history classes (7.9). Albany NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
11. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
12. Conole, G. & Oliver, M. (1998). A pedagogical framework for embedding C&IT into the curriculum. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 6, 2, 4-16.
13. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Cziko, G. (1995). Without miracles: universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Engestrom, Y. (1991). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Multidisciplinary Newsletter for Activity Theory, 7/8, 6-17.
16. Engestrom, Y. & Middleton, D. (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ferdig, R. E. (2000). Emotional responses to computers: experiences in unfairness, anger, and spite. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
18. Ferdig, R. E. (2001). Psychological investigations of educational explorations with technology: understanding what makes a 'good innovation'. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
19. Ferdig, R. E. (2004). Towards implementing technologies in education: Exploring the pedagogy and people of good innovations. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 2, (online serial).
20. Ferdig, R. E., Mishra, P. & Zhao, Y. (2004). Component architectures and web based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15, 1, 75-90.
21. Gavelek, J. R. & Raphael, T. (1996). Changing talk about text: new roles for teachers and students. Language Arts, 73, 182-192.
22. Hawkins, J. (1987). The interpretation of Logo in practice. In R. D. Pea, K. Sheingold, Bank Street College of Education & Center for Children and Technology (Eds), Mirrors of minds: patterns of experience in educational computing: papers from the Center for Children and Technology, Bank Street College (pp. 3-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
23. Jones, T. H. & Paolucci, R. (1998). The learning effectiveness of educational technology: a call for further research. Educational Technology Review, 9, (issues 2-3), 10-14.
24. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W. & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal 94, 5, 483-497.
25. Laurillard, D. (1996). Rethinking university teaching. London: Routledge.
26. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Linn, M. C. (1992). The computer as learning partner: Can computer tools teach science? In K. Sheingold, L. G. Roberts & S. M. Malcolm (Eds), This year in school science 1991: Technology for teaching and learning (pp. 31-69). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
28. Littlejohn, A. H. & Stefani, L. J. (1999). Effective use of communication and information technology: bridging the skills gap. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 7, 2, 66-76.
29. Newman, F. M., Secada, W. G., Wehlage, G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: vision, standards and scoring. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
30. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the, age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
31. Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Olson, D. R. (1998). What writing does to the mind. Paper presented at the Jean Piaget Society, June 10, Chicago, IL.
33. Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. July.
34. Prawat, R. S. (1996). Constructivisms, modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist, 31, 3/4, 215-225.
35. Reeves, T. C. (1999). A research agenda for interactive learning in the new millennium. Paper presented at the Ed-Media 1999.
36. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA; New York: CSLI Publications; Cambridge University Press.
37. Resnick, M., Rusk, N. & Cooke, S. (1998). The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city. In D. Schon, B. Sanyal & W. Mitchell (Eds), High Technology and Low-Income Communities (pp. 266-286). Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 4, 209-229.
39. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 3, 235-276.
40. Rowe, K. (2000). Plan purposeful programs to achieve specific student learning outcomes. Northern Territory Australia Department of Education.
41. Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: the case of the writing partner. In S. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 179-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Sandford, S. & Richardson, K. (1997). Interactive instructional design: old paradigms for new technologies. Paper presented at the NAU/web.9 7, June 14, Flagstaff, A.Z.
43. Scardamalia, M. &Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1,1, 37-68.
44. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 2, 4-14.
45. Tudge, J. R. H. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboratoin: a Vygotskian analysis. Child Development, 63, 1364-1379.
46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Zhao, Y., Englert, C. S., Jones, S. C., Chen, J. & Ferdig, R. E. (2000). The development of a webbased learning environment: a dialogue between innovation and established practicies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 4.
49. Zhao, Y., Mishra, P., Worthington, V. & Ferdig, R. E. (1999). A socio-technical perspective on webbased manuscript management and publishing: a two-year case study. Vine: Journal of the Library Information Technology Center (111), Special issue on Electronic Journals and their management, pp. 23-30.
50. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S. & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 3, 482-515.
51. Zhao, Y., Worthington, V. & Ferdig, R. E. (1998). Understanding the dialogue between technological innovations and established practices: a progress report of the AERA electronic proposal processing system. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.