The development of a web-based literacy learning environment: A dialogue between innovation and established practices

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 435-454

  Zhao, Yong ^a   Englert, Carol Sue ^a   Chen, Jing ^a   Jones, Su Chin ^a   Ferdig, Richard E ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Literacy; Web based learning environments

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010500329     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782290     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AppleWorks [Computer software], (1991-1998). Cupertino, CA: Apple.
2. Bromley, H. (1997). The social chicken and the technological egg. Educational Theory, 47(1), 51-65.
3. Bruce, B. (1993). Innovation and social change. In B. C. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms (p. 32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bruce, B. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 289-309.
5. Bruce, B, & Hogan, M. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (p. 281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Communicator [Computer software]. (1995-1999). Mountain View, CA: Netscape Communications.
7. Daiute, C. (1992). Multimedia composing: Extending the resources of kindergarten to writers across the grades. Language Arts, 69(4), 250-260.
8. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
9. Eudora [Computer software]. (1988-1997). San Diego, CA: Qualcomm.
10. Englert, C, Raphael, T, & Mariage, T. (1994). Developing a school-based discourse for literacy learning: A principled search for understanding. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 2-32.
11. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1996). A sociocultural perspective: Teaching ways-of-thinking and ways-of-talking in a literacy community. Learning Disabilities Research and Practices, 11(3), 157-167.
12. Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., Garmon, M. A., & Tarrant, K. L. (1998). Accelerating the reading progress in Early Literacy Project classrooms: Three exploratory studies. Remedial and Special Education, 19(3), 142-159, 180.
13. Englert, C. S., Garmon, A., Mariage, T, Rozerdal, M., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1995). The Early Literacy Project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 253-275.
14. Espin, C, & Sindelar, P. (1988). Auditory feedback and writing: Learning disabled and nondisabled students. Exceptional Children, 55(1), 45-51.
15. Gardner, H. (1991). The difficulties of school: Probable causes, possible cures. In S. Graubard (Ed.), Literacy: An overview by fourteen experts (pp. 85-114). New York: Hill and Wang.
16. HyperStudio [Computer software]. (1993-1998). El Cajon, CA: Roger Wagner Publishing, a division of Knowledge Adventure.
17. Inspiration [Computer software]. (1988-1999). Portland, OR: Inspiration Software.
18. Jones, K., Torgesen, J., Sc Sexton, M. (1987), Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122-138.
19. Kaput, J., & Roschelle, J. (1996). Connecting the connectivity and the component revolutions to deep curriculum reform. In U.S. Department of Education (Ed.), The future of networking technologies for learning: White papers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available: Www.ed.gov/Technology/Futures/toc.html.
20. Levinson, P. (1997). The soft edge: A natural history and future of the information revolution. New York: Routledge.
21. Mishra, P., Zhao, Y., & Tan, S. (1999). From concept to software: Developing a framework for understanding the process of software design. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(2), 220-238.
22. Oiler, J., &C Jonz, J. (Eds.). (1994). Cloze and coherence. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
23. Poplin, M. S. (1988). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(7), 401-416.
24. Raskind, M, & Higgins, E. (1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 141-158.
25. Rosegrant, T. (1985). Using the microcomputer as a tool for learning to read and write. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(2), 113-115.
26. Roth, S. E & Beck, I. L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 197-218.
27. Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Salomon, G., & Almog, T (1998), Educational psychology and technology: A matter of reciprocal relations. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 222-241.
29. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
30. Storyspace [Computer software]. (1990-1999). Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems.
31. Talker [Computer software]. (1995-1996). Mountain View, CA: MVP Solutions.
32. Vygotsky, L, S. (1978), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Word [Computer software](1983-1999). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
34. Word Perfect [Computer software]. (1988-1998). Ottawa, Canada: Corel.
35. Zhao, Y (1998). Design for adoption: The development of an integrated Web-based education environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(3), 307-328.