New Technology for Imaging and Documenting Urologic Procedures

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 397-408

  Marguet, Charles G ^a   Springhart, W Patrick ^a   Preminger, Glenn M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL IMAGING; ENDOSCOPE; FIBERSCOPE ENDOSCOPY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; LIGHT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEMEDICINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UROLOGY; VIDEORECORDING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INTERNET; TELEMEDICINE; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 33745740525     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2006.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Kennedy T.J., and Preminger G.M. Impact of video on endourology. J Endourol 1 (1987) 75
2. Litwiler S.E., and Preminger G.M. Advances in electronic imaging for laparoscopy. J Endourol 7 (1993) S195
3. Preminger G.M. Video-assisted transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol 5 (1991) 161
4. Knyrim K., Seidlitz H., Vakil N., et al. Perspectives in electronic endoscopy. Past, present, and future of fibers and CCDs in medical endoscopes. Endoscopy 22 Suppl 1 (1990) 2
5. Boppart S.A., Deutsch T.F., and Rattner D.W. Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Current status and future directions. Surg Endosc 13 (1999) 718
6. Cuschieri A. Technology for minimal access surgery. Interview by Judy Jones. BMJ 319 (1999) 1304
7. Afane J.S., Olweny E.O., Bercowsky E., et al. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164 (2000) 1164
8. Auge B.K., and Preminger G.M. Digital cameras and documentation in urologic practice. AUA update series XXI (2002), American Urologic Association Press, Linthicum (MD)
9. Levisohn P.M. Safety and tolerability of topiramate in children. J Child Neurol 15 Suppl 1 (2000) S22
10. Niwa H., Kawaguchi A., Miyahara T., et al. Clinical use of new video endoscopes (EVIS 100 and 200). Endoscopy 24 (1992) 222
11. Pelosi M.A., Kadar N., and Pelosi III M.A. The electronic video operative laparoscope. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1 (1993) 54
12. Springhart W.P., Maloney M.M., Sur R.L., et al. Digital video ureteroscope: a new paradigm in ureteroscopy. J Urol 173 (2005) 428S
13. Kuo R.L., and Preminger G.M. Current urologic applications of digital imaging. J Endourol 15 (2001) 53
14. Kuo R.L., Aslan P., Dinlenc C.Z., et al. Secure transmission of urologic images and records over the Internet. J Endourol 13 (1999) 141
15. Kuo R.L., Delvecchio F.C., and Preminger G.M. Use of a digital camera in the urologic setting. Urology 53 (1999) 613
16. Wurnig P.N., Hollaus P.H., Wurnig C.H., et al. A new method for digital video documentation in surgical procedures and minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 232
17. Arernso R.L., Andriole K.P., Avrin D.E., et al. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future. J Digit Imaging 13 (2000) 145
18. Fujino M.A., Ikeda M., Yamamoto Y., et al. Development of an integrated filing system for endoscopic images. Endoscopy 23 (1991) 11
19. Martinez R., Cole C., Rozenblit J., et al. Common object request broker architecture (CORBA)-based security services for the virtual radiology environment. J Digit Imaging 13 (2000) 59
20. Emam T.A., Hanna G., and Cuschieri A. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16 (2002) 267
21. Schurr M.O., Kunert W., Arezzo A., et al. The role and future of endoscopic imaging systems. Endoscopy 31 (1999) 557
22. Huang H. Image storage, transmission, and manipulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 1 (1992) 85
23. Yoshihiro A., Nakata N., Harada J., et al. Wireless local area networking for linking a PC reporting system and PACS: clinical feasibility in emergency reporting. Radiographics 22 (2002) 721
24. Tan Y.H., and Preminger G.M. Advances in video and imaging in ureteroscopy. Urol Clin North Am 31 (2004) 33
25. Gandsas A., McIntire K., and Park A. Live broadcast of laparoscopic surgery to handheld computers. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 997
26. Pagani L., Jyrkinen L., Niinimaki J., et al. A portable diagnostic workstation based on a Web pad: implementation and evaluation. J Telemed Telecare 9 (2003) 225
27. Berguer R., Forkey D.L., and Smith W.D. The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc 15 (2001) 1027
28. Berguer R., Rab G.T., Abu-Ghaida H., et al. A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11 (1997) 139
29. Hemal A.K., Srinivas M., and Charles A.R. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol 15 (2001) 499
30. Nguyen N.T., Ho H.S., Smith W.D., et al. An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg 182 (2001) 720
31. Herron D.M., Gagner M., Kenyon T.L., et al. The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements. Surg Endosc 15 (2001) 415
32. Kenyon T.A., Urbach D.R., Speer J.B., et al. Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 15 (2001) 1140
33. Durrani A.F., and Preminger G.M. Three-dimensional video imaging for endoscopic surgery. Comput Biol Med 25 (1995) 237
34. Hanna G., and Cuschieri A. Image display technology and image processing. World J Surg 25 (2001) 1419
35. Herron D.M., Lantis II J.C., Maykel J., et al. The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 13 (1999) 751
36. Hofmeister J., Frank T.G., Cuschieri A., et al. Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Semin Laparosc Surg 8 (2001) 12
37. van Bergen P., Kunert W., and Buess G.F. The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 14 (2000) 71
38. Chang L., Satava R.M., Pellegrini C.A., et al. Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 1744
39. Dakin G.F., and Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 574
40. Renda A., and Vallancien G. Principles and advantages of robotics in urologic surgery. Curr Urol Rep 4 (2003) 114
41. Kuo R.L., Delvecchio F.C., and Preminger G.M. Virtual reality: current urologic applications and future developments. J Endourol 15 (2001) 117
42. Preminger G.M., Babayan R.K., Merril G.L., et al. Virtual reality surgical simulation in endoscopic urologic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 29 (1996) 157
43. Shah J., Mackay S., Vale J., et al. Simulation in urology-a role for virtual reality?. BJU Int 88 (2001) 661
44. Matsumoto E.D., Hamstra S.J., Radomski S.B., et al. The effect of bench model fidelity on endo-urological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 167 (2002) 1243
45. Merril J.R., Preminger G.M., Babayan R.K., et al. Surgical simulation using virtual reality technology: design, implementation and implications. Surg Technol Int III (1994) 53
46. Jacomides L., Ogan K., Cadeddu J.A., et al. Use of a virtual reality simulator for ureteroscopy training. J Urol 171 (2004) 320
47. Johnson D.B., Kondraske G.V., Wilhelm D.M., et al. Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts the performance of virtual ureterorenoscopy. J Urol 171 (2004) 80
48. Watterson J.D., Beiko D.T., Kuan J.K., et al. Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquisition of ureteroscopy skills using computer-based virtual reality endo-urological simulator. J Urol 168 (2002) 1928
49. Wilhelm D.M., Ogan K., Roehrborn C.G., et al. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator. J Am Coll Surg 195 (2002) 675
50. Shah J., and Darzi A. Virtual reality flexible cystoscopy: a validation study. BJU Int 90 (2002) 828
51. Adrales G.L., Park A.E., Chu U.B., et al. A valid method of laparoscopic simulation training and competence assessment. J Surg Res 114 (2003) 156
52. Gettman M.T., Kondraske G.V., Traxer O., et al. Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts operative performance of laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 197 (2003) 489
53. Gor M., McCloy R., Stone R., et al. Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for assessment in gynaecology. BJOG 110 (2003) 181
54. Schijven M.P., and Jakimowicz J. The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 121
55. McFarlane N., and Denstedt J. Imaging and the Internet. J Endourol 15 (2001) 59
56. Kuo R.L., Delvecchio F.C., Babayan R.K., et al. Telemedicine: recent developments and future applications. J Endourol 15 (2001) 63
57. Goldberg M.A. Teleradiology and telemedicine. Radiol Clin North Am 34 (1996) 647
58. Crump W.J., and Pfeil T. A telemedicine primer. An introduction to the technology and an overview of the literature. Arch Fam Med 4 (1995) 796
59. Takeda H., Minato K., and Takahasi T. High quality image oriented telemedicine with multimedia technology. Int J Med Inform 55 (1999) 23
60. Byrne J.P., and Mughal M.M. Telementoring as an adjunct to training and competence-based assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14 (2000) 1159
61. Janetschek G., Bartsch G., and Kavoussi L.R. Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 160 (1998) 1413
62. Lee B.R., Bishoff J.T., Janetschek G., et al. A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J Urol 16 (1998) 367
63. Lee B.R., Caddedu J.A., and Janetschek G. International surgical telemonitoring: our initial experience. In: Westwood J.D., Hoffman H.M., Stedney D., et al. (Eds). Medicine meets virtual reality: art, science, technology: healthcare (r)evolution (1998), IOS Press, Amsterdam (the Netherlands) 41
64. Moore R.G., Adams J.B., Partin A.W., et al. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 10 (1996) 107
65. Rosser Jr. J.C., Herman B., and Giammaria L.E. Telementoring. Semin Laparosc Surg 10 (2003) 209
66. Micali S., Vespasiani G., Finazzi-Agro E., et al. Feasibility of telesurgery between Baltimore, USA and Rome, Italy: the first five cases. J Endourol 14 (2000) 493-496
67. Lee B.R., Png D.J., Liew L., et al. Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29 (2000) 665
68. Link R.E., Schulam P.G., and Kavoussi L.R. Telesurgery. Remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am 28 (2001) 177