Assessment of basic human performance resources predicts operative performance of laparoscopic surgery

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 197, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 489-496

  Gettman, Matthew T ^a   Kondraske, George V ^b   Traxer, Olivier ^c   Ogan, Ken ^a   Napper, Cheryl ^a   Jones, Daniel B ^a   Pearle, Margaret S ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^c UT Southwestern Medical Center ^*

Author keywords

Basic Element of Performance (refers to testing modules); Basic Performance Resource; BEP; BPR; General Systems Performance Theory; GSPT; High level task; HLT; Laparoscopic nephrectomy; LN; NCRA; Nonlinear Causal Resource Analysis; RDF; Resource Demand Function

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BASIC PERFORMANCE RESOURCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; NONLINEAR CAUSAL RESOURCE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RESIDENT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; THEORY; UROLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOLUNTEER; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; STANDARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141610010     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00333-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abbou C.C., Cicco A., Gasman D., et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 161:1999;1776-1780.
2. Rassweiler J., Frede T., Henkel T.O., et al. Nephrectomy a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol. 33:1998;489-496.
3. Rosser J.C., Rosser L.E., Savalgi R.S. Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg. 133:1998;657-661.
4. Gallagher A.G., McClure N., McGuigan J., et al. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR). Endoscopy. 31:1999;310-313.
5. Martin J.A., Regehr G., Reznick R., et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 84:1997;273-278.
6. Macmillan A.I.M., Cuschieri A. Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the advanced Dundee endoscopic pyschomotor tester predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg. 177:1999;274-277.
7. Kondraske G.V. A PC-based performance measurement laboratory system. J Clin Engr. 15:1990;467.
8. Kondraske G.V., Beehler P.J. Applying general systems performance theory and the elemental resource model to gender-related issues in physical education and sport. Women Phys Ed Sport J. 3:1994;1-19.
9. Kondraske G.V. A working model for human system-task interfaces. Bronzino J. The biomedical engineering handbook. 2nd ed :2000;147.1-147.17 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
10. Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Hart I.R., et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 282:1999;861-866.
11. Hawasli A., Featherstone R., Lloyd L., et al. Laparoscopic training in residency program. J Laparoendoscop Surg. 6:1996;171-174.
12. Kondraske G.V., Vasta P.J. Measurement of information processing performance capacities. Bronzino J. The biomedical engineering handbook. 2nd ed :2000;150.1-150.14 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Kondraske GV, Vasta PJ. Neuromotor channel capacity, coordination, and motion quality, CD-ROM Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, July 23-28, 2000
14. Reznick R., Regehr G., MacRae H., et al. Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. Am J Surg. 173:1997;226-230.
15. Gallagher A.G., Cowie R., Crothers I., et al. PicSOr An objective test of perceptual ability that predicted laparoscopic performance in three separate studies. J Soc Laparoscop Surg. 5:2001;322.
16. Melvin W.S., Johnson J.A., Ellison E.C. Laparoscopic skills enhancement. Am J Surg. 172:1996;377-379.
17. Darzi A., Smith S., Taffinder N. Assessing operative skill needs to be more objective. Br Med J. 318:1999;887-888.
18. Traxer O., Gettman M.T., Napper C., et al. Impact of intense laparoscopic skills training on operative performance of urology residents. J Urol. 166:2001;1658-1661.
19. Satava RM. The need for metrics in surgical education (Commentary). Surg Endosc 1999:13:1082
20. Kondraske GV, Johnston C, Pearson A, Tarbox L. Performance prediction and limiting resource identification with nonlinear causal resource analysis. Proceedings, 19th Annual Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference, 1997, 1813-1816
21. Keehner M., Tendick F., Meng M.V., et al. Assessment of cognitive functions and laparoscopic skills (Abstract 95). J Urol. 167:(S):2002;23.