Inter-relations of tutor's and peers' scaffolding and decision-making discourse acts

Instructional Science

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 313-341

  Pata, Kai ^a   Lehtinen, Erno ^b   Sarapuu, Tago ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Decision making; Synchronous collaborative learning environment; Tutor and peer scaffolding

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745739293     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-005-3406-5     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Baker, M.J., Quignard, M, Lund, K. & Séjourné, A. (2003). Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen and U. Hoppe, eds., Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the CSCL' 2003, pp. 11-20. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
3. Bales, R.F. (1999). Social interaction systems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
4. Bransford, J.D., Sherwood, R.D., Hasselbring, T.S., Kinzer, C.K. & Williams, S.M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix and R. Sprio, eds., Cognition, education and multimedia, pp. 115-141. Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Brown, A.L. & Palinscar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individualized knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick, eds., Knowing, learning and instruction: essays in honour of robert Glaeser, pp. 393-451. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Brown, A.L., Rutherford, M, Nakagawa, K, Gordon, A. & Campione, J.C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon, ed., Distributed cognitions, pp. 188-228. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
7. Chasek, P. (1997). A comparative analysis of multilateral environmental negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation 6: 437-461.
8. Chi, M.T.H. (1996). Constructing self-explanation and scaffolding explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10: 33-49.
9. Chi, M.T.H, Siler, S.A., Jeong, H, Yamauchi, T. & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 25: 471-533.
10. Clark, H.H. & Schaefer, E.F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13: 259-294.
11. Collins, A, Brown, J.S. & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick, ed., Knowing, learning and instruction: essays in honour of Robert Glaeser, pp. 453-494. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
12. Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Strategic uses of peer learning in children's education. In T.J. Berndt and G.W. Ladd, eds., Peer relationships in child development, pp. 135-157. John Wiley and Sons: NY.
13. Douglas, S. (1991). Tutoring as interaction: Detection and repairing tutoring failures. In P. Goodyear, ed., Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring, pp. 123-148. Ablex Publishing Corp: Norwood, NJ.
14. Edelson, D.C., Gordin, D.N. & Pea, R.D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of Learning Sciences 8: 391-450.
15. Elbers, E, Maier, R, Hoekstra, T. & Hoogsteder, M. (1992). Internalization and adult-child interaction. Learning and Instruction 2: 101-118.
16. Forman, E. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research 13: 55-70.
17. Fox, B. (1991). Cognitive and interactional aspects of correction in tutoring. In P. Goodyear, ed., Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring, pp. 149-172. Ablex Publishing Corp: Norwood, NJ.
18. Ge, X. & Land, S.M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development 51(1): 21-38.
19. Goos, M, Galbraith, P. & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics 49: 193-223.
20. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K. & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9: 495-522.
21. Guzdial, M. & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of Learning Sciences 9: 437-469.
22. Guzdial, M., Carlson, D., Turns, J. (1995). Facilitating learning design with software-realized scaffolding for collaboration. In D. Budny, ed., Frontiers in education' 95, Vol. 1. Atlanta GA, pp. 2b2.6-2b2.11.
23. Hewitt, J. & Tevlops, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In C. Hoadley, ed., Proceedings of CSCL' 99: The third international conference on computer support for collaborative learning, pp. 232-241. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
24. Iiskala, T, Vauras, M. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer-learning. The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society 1(2): 147-178.
25. Järvelä, S. (1995). The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction. Learning and Instruction 5: 237-259.
26. Jermann, P. (2002). Task and interaction regulation in controlling a traffic simulation. In G. Stahl, ed., Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for CSCL community, Proceedings of CSCL' 2002, pp. 601-602. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.
27. Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward meta-theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research and Development 48(4): 63-85.
28. King, A, Staffieri, A. & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer-tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 90(1): 134-152.
29. Lipponen, L. (1999). Challenges for computer supported collaborative learning in elementary and secondary level: Finnish perspective. In C. Hoadley, ed., Proceedings of CSCL' 99: The third international conference on computer support for collaborative learning, pp. 368-375. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
30. Lipponen, L. (2001). Computer-supported collaborative learning: From promises to reality. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Turku, Turku, Finland: Turun Yliopisto.
31. Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. (1997). Developing culture of inquiry in computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake and N. Enyedy, eds., Proceedings of the CSCL' 97: The second international conference on computer support for collaborative learning, pp. 164-168. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
32. Muukkonen, H, Hakkarainen, K. & Lakkala, M. (1999). Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: The future learning environment tools. In C. Hoadley, ed., Proceedings of CSCL' 99: The third international conference on computer support for collaborative learning, pp. 406-415. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
33. Pata, K. & Sarapuu, T. (2001a). The role of scaffolding in environmental decision-making in synchronous learning environments. In N. Valanides, ed., Proceedings of the first IOSTE symposium in Southern Europe, science and technology education: preparing future citizens, Vol. 7, pp. 439-447. Imprinta Ltd: Paralimni, Cyprus.
34. Pata, K. & Sarapuu, T. (2001 b). Application of cooperative learning environment in developing students' environmental decision-making skills. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001(1): 1456-1458.
35. Pata, K. & Sarapuu, T. (2003). Developing students' mental models of environmental problems by decision-making role-play in synchronous network-based environment. In J. Lewis, A. Magro and L. Simonneaux, eds., Biology education for the real world. Proceedings of the IVth ERIDOB Conference, pp. 335-348. Paragraphic/Groupe Lienhart: Toulouse, France.
36. Pata, K, Sarapuu, T. & Archee, R. (2005). Collaborative scaffolding in synchronous environment: congruity and antagonism of tutor/student facilitation acts. In T. Koschman, D.D. Suthers and T.-W. Chan, eds., Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years, pp. 484-493, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
37. Pressley, M, Hogan, K, Wharton-McDonald, R, Mistretta, J. & Ettenberger, S. (1996). The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 11(3): 138-146.
38. Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education 19(2): 167-182.
39. Roscoe, R.D. and Chi, M.T.H. (2005). The influence of the tutee in learning by peer tutoring. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner and T. Reiger, eds., Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp. 1179-1184. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
40. Scardamalia, M, Bereiter, C, McLean, R.S., Swallow, J. & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 5: 51-68.
41. Searle, D. (1984). Scaffolding: Who's building whose building?. Language Arts 61: 480-483.
42. Stone, C.A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its' utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 4: 344-364.
43. Traum, D.R. and Allen, J.F. (1994). Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL-94), pp. 1-8. Las Cruces, NM.
44. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45. Wood, D.J., Bruner, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17: 89-100.
46. Wu, A. S., Farrell, R. and Singley, M. K. (2002). Scaffolding group learning in a collaborative network environment. In Proceedings of the conference CSCL' 2002, pp. 245-53. Boulder, CO.