Fatigue debonding of the roughened stem-cement interface: Effects of surface roughness and stem heating conditions

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 181-188

  Damron, Leatha A ^a   Kim, Do Gyoon ^a   Mann, Kenneth A ^a  

^a State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Acrylic; Bone cement; Computer modeling simulation; Fatigue; Hip prosthesis; Implant interface; PMMA

Indexed keywords

ACRYLICS; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; HEATING; HIP PROSTHESES; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ELASTIC FRACTURE; FATIGUE DEBOND RESPONSE; IMPLANT INTERFACE; PMMA;

BONE CEMENT;

BIOMATERIAL; BONE CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FATIGUE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE; HEATING; HIP PROSTHESIS; IMPLANT; POLYMERIZATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE;

EID: 33745713061     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30470     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;355:90-102.
2. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;355:103-112.
3. Iesaka K, Jaffe WL, Kummer FJ. Effects of preheating of hip prostheses on the stem-cement interface. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85A:421-427.
4. Gilbert JL, Hasenwinkel JM, Wixson RL, Lautenschlager EP. A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: A potential major source of porosity. J Biomed Mat Res 2000;52:210-218.
5. Bishop NE, Ferguson S, Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J Bone Jnt Surg 1996;78B:349-357.
6. Collis DK, Mohler CG. Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;355:113-122.
7. Della Valle AMG, Zoppi A, Peterson MGE, Salvati EA. Surface finish affects the clinical and radiographic performance of a modern cemented femoral stem. In: Surgeons AAoO, editor. 2005 Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; P028.
8. Ong A, Wong KL, Lai M, Garino JP, Steinberg ME. Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84A:786-792.
9. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS, Dua V, Ranawat AS, Rodriguez JA. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of smooth versus rough stems using cement fixation: Minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(Suppl 2):2-9.
10. Vail TP, Goetz D, Tanzer M, Fisher DA, Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ. A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry. J Arthroplasty 2003;18(Suppl 1):95-102.
11. Wang JS, Taylor M, Flivik G, Lidgren L. Factors affecting the static shear strength of the prosthetic stem-bone cement interface. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:55-61.
12. Harrigan TP, Harris WH. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J Biomech 1991;24:1047-1058.
13. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;336:297-307.
14. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Murphy BP, Pendergast PJ, Huiskes R. Finite element stimulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement. Engr Fract Mech 2004;71:513-528.
15. Hertzler J, Miller MA, Mann KA. Fatigue crack growth rate does not depend on mantle thickness: An idealized cemented stem constructed under torsional loading. J Orthop Res 2002;20:676-682.
16. Broek D. Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1991.
17. Heuer DA, Mann KA. Fatigue fracture of the stem-cement interface with a clamped cantilever beam test. J Biomech Eng 2000;122:647-651.
18. Mann KA, Damron LA, Race A, Ayers DC. Early cementing does not increase debond energy of grit blasted interfaces. J Orthop Res 2004;22:822-827.
19. Ugural AC, Fenster SK. Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity. New York: Elsevier; 1986.
20. Race A, Miller MA, Ayers DC, Cleary RJ, Mann KA. The influence of surface roughness on stem-cement gaps. J Bone Jnt Surg 2002;84B:1199-1204.
21. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993;26:969-990.
22. Kanninen MF, Popelar CH. Advanced Fracture Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985.
23. Dall DM, Miles AW, Juby G. Accelerated polymerization of acrylic bone cement using preheated implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;211:148-150.
24. Ohashi KL, Romero AC, McGowan PD, Maloney WJ, Dauskardt RH. Adhesion and reliability of interfaces in cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Orthop Res 1998;16:705-714.
25. Schmalzried TP, Zahiri CA, Woolson ST. The significance of stem-cement loosening of grit-blasted femoral components. Orthopedics 2000;23:1157-1164.
26. Cannestra VP, Berger RA, Quigley LR, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1291-1299.
27. Harris WH. Long term results of cemented femoral stems with roughened precoated surfaces. Clin Ortop Rel Res 1998;355:137-143.