Developments in ambulatory electrocardiography

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 238-245

  Eveloy, Valérie ^a   Liu, Yan ^b   Pecht, Michael G ^c  

^a KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c Petroleum Institute Abu Dhabi ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CVD); CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; THERAPY;

CARDIOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; PATIENT MONITORING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

AMBULATORY MONITORING; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SUDDEN DEATH; WAVEFORM;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; HUMANS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RISK FACTORS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33745654794     PISSN: 08998205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2345/i0899-8205-40-3-238.1     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. American Heart Association. International Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. 2005.
2. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2005 Update. 2005.
3. Petersen S, Peto V, Rayner M, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics-2005 Edition. 2005.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State-specific mortality from sudden cardiac death - United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 51;6:2002.
5. Angioplasty.org. Restenosis. Available at: http://www. ptca.org/devices6.html. Accessed April 2005.
6. Pavlopoulos SA, Stasis ACH, Loukis EN. A decision tree-based method for the differential diagnosis of aortic stenosis from mitral regurgitation using heart sounds. Biomed Eng Online. 2004;3(21).
7. Scanlon MV. Acoustic sensor for health status monitoring. Proc IRIS Acoust Seismis. 1998;2:205-222.
8. Tong DA. Investigation into electrocardiogram motion artifact reduction, 10-9191. Southwest Research Institute. Available at: http://www.swri.edu/3pubs/ IRD2000/10-9191.htm. Accessed July 21, 2005.
9. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 10th ed. WB Saunders Co; 2000.
10. Webster JG. Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1998.
11. Smith, M. Rx for ECG monitoring artifact. Crit Care Nurse. 1984;4(1):64-66.
12. Harland CJ, Clark TD, Prance RJ. High resolution ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring using wrist-mounted electric potential sensors. Meas Sci Technol. 2003;14:923-928.
13. Kadish AH. ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on electrocardiography and ambulatory electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:2091-2100.
14. Zimetbaum PJ, Josephson ME. The evolving role of ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring in general clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:848-856.
15. Kowey PR, Kocovic DZ. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Circulation. 2003;108:e31-e33.
16. Virginia Mason Medical Center. Holter monitors. Available at: http://www.virginiamason.org/dbCardiology/sec358. htm. Accessed July 29, 2005.
17. MedFirst Healthcare Supply Inc. Holters. Available at: http://www.medfirstonline.com/showitems.cfm?Product_ Group=Holters. Accessed July 11, 2005.
18. Charuvastra, E. Transtelephonic cardiac event recording for Arrhythmia Surveillance. Congenital Heart Information Network. Available at: http://tchin.org/resource_room/c_art_07.htm. Accessed August 2, 2005.
19. Meditech. Merlin. Available at: http://www.meditech.hu/ecgdesc.html. Accessed August 3, 2005.
20. Mona-System Teleconsulting System. ECG-Watch: an ECG event recorder. Available at: http://www.monasystem. hu/html/angolmerlin.html. Accessed August 3, 2005.
21. LifeWatch. WristRecorder Plus. Available at: http://www. lifewatchinc.com/WristRecorder-Plus.asp. Accessed August 3, 2005.
22. Cleveland Clinic Heart Center. Ambulatory monitors. Available at: http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/pub/guide/tests/electrocard/ ambmonitor.htm. Accessed August 2, 2005.
23. Cardionet. How it works. Available at: http://www.cardionet. com/how.html. Accessed August 14, 2005.
24. Welch J, Guilak F, Baker SD. A wireless ECG smart sensor for broad application in life threatening event detection. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference. 2004;2:3447-3449.
25. BodyMedia. BodyMedia unveils advance in continuous long-term heart monitoring at arrhythmia technologies retreat. Available at: http://www.bodymedia.com/press/press/natr_heartrate.jsp. Accessed August 2, 2005.
26. Al-Ahmad A, Homer M, Wang P. Accuracy and utility of multi-sensor armband ECG signal compared with Holter monitoring (preliminary data). Available at: http://www. bodymedia.com/pdf/stanford_heartrate.pdf. Accessed March 5, 2006.
27. Wiese SR, Anheier P, Connemara RD, Mollner AT, Neils TF, Kahn JA, Webster JG. Electrocardiographs motion artifact versus electrode impedance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:136-139.
28. Ruffini G, Dunne S, Farres E, Marco-Pallares J, Ray C, Mendoza E, Silva R, Grau C. A dry electrophysiology electrode using CNT arrays. Proceedings of Eurosensors XIX. 2005, Barcelona, Spain.
29. Hamilton PS, Curley MG. Adaptive removal of motion artifact. Engineering in Medicine and Biology society. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference. October 30-November 2, 1997. 1:297-299.
30. Tong DA, Bartels KA, Honeyager KS. Adaptive reduction of motion artifact in the electrocardiogram. Engineering in Medicine and Biology (EMBS/BMES), Proceedings of the Second Joint of the 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting. October 23-26, 2002. 2:1403-1404.
31. de Talhouet H, Webster JG. The origin of skin-stretch-caused motion artifacts under electrodes. Physiol Meas. 1996;17:81-93.
32. University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey. Holter monitoring. Available at: http://www.umdnj.edu/rspthweb/crt/holter.htm. Accessed July 29, 2005.
33. Ng J, Sahakian AV, Swiryn S. Sensing and documentation of body position during ambulatory ECG monitoring. Comput Cardiol. September 24-27, 2000;77-80.
34. Burbank DP, Webster JG. Reducing skin potential motion artifact by skin abrasion. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1978; 16:31-38.
35. Raya MAD, Sison LG. Adaptive noise cancelling of motion artifact in stress ECG signals using accelerometer. Engineering in Medicine and Biology (EMBS/BMES), Proceedings of the Second Joint of the 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting. October 23-26, 2002. 2:1756-1757.
36. Hamilton PS, Curley M, Aimi R. Effect of adaptive motion-artifact reduction on QRS detection. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2000;34:197-202.
37. Hamilton PS, Curley MG, Aimi RM, Sae-Hau C. Comparison of methods for adaptive removal of motion artifact, Comput Cardiol. September 24-27, 2000;383-386.
38. Federeci JF, Guzelsu N, Lim HC, Jannuzzi G, Findley T, Chaudhry HR, Ritter AB. Noninvasive light-reflection technique for measuring soft-tissue stretch. Appl Opt. 1999;38:6653-6660.
39. Prance RJ, Debray A, Clark TD, Prance H, Nock M, Harland CJ. An ultra-low-noise electrical-potential probe for human-body scanning. Meas Sci Technol. 2000;11:291-297.
40. Harland CJ, Clark TD, Prance RJ. Electrical potential probes-new directions in the remote sensing of the human body. Meas Sci Technol. 2002;13:163-169.