|
Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 136-139
|
Electrocardiographic motion artifact versus electrode impedance
|
Author keywords
Artifact; Cardiac monitor; ECG; Electrocardiogram; Electrode; Impedance; Lead; Motion artifact
|
Indexed keywords
AIR;
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;
CORRELATION METHODS;
ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE;
ELECTRODES;
ELECTRODE IMPEDANCE;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFACT;
ARTIFACT REDUCTION;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING;
ELECTRODE;
FEMALE;
HEART ARRHYTHMIA;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
IMPEDANCE;
MALE;
MONITOR;
MOTION;
NORMAL HUMAN;
PATIENT MONITORING;
QRS COMPLEX;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTIFACTS;
ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
ELECTRODES;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MOVEMENT;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 11244283168
PISSN: 00189294
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.836503 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (31)
|
References (10)
|