The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm

Psychological Research

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 317-335

  Fischer, Rico ^a   Hagendorf, Herbert ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33745636775     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0220-2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Awh, E., Matsukura, M., & Serences, J. T. (2003). Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 52-63.
2. Bacon, W.F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
3. Behringer, J. (2000). Experimental run system. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: BeriSoft.
4. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.
5. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., O'Donnell, C., & Pratt, J. (2002a). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in locations tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207-225.
6. Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002b). The influence of probe-trial election requirements on the location negative priming effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 273-282.
7. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modelling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
8. Cepeda, N. J., Cave, K. R., Bichot, N. P., & Kim, M. S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor location. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 727-746.
9. Christie, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38.
10. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
11. Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 75-97.
12. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
13. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242.
14. Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467-473.
15. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
16. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
17. Fox, E. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 565-574.
18. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145-173.
19. Gibson, B. S. (1996). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1496-1504.
20. Hommel, B. (2000). Intentional control of automatic stimulusresponse translation. In Y. Rossetti & A. Revonsuo (Eds.), Beyond dissociation: Interaction between dissociated implicit and explicit processing (pp. 221-242). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory and language (pp. 53-113). Orlando, FL: Academic.
22. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
24. Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., Rahal, T., & Stolzfus, E. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 637-650.
25. MacDonald, P. A., Joordens, S., Seergobin, K. N. (1999). Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attention to distractor does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it. Memory and Cognition, 27, 197-207.
26. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
27. Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
28. Milliken, B., Tipper, S., Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring and repetition; On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1280-1296.
29. Müller, H., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
30. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565-576.
31. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming. II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
32. Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., & Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 119-121.
33. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic.
34. Pratt, J., & Hirshhorn, M. (2003). Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Psychological Research, 67, 261-265.
35. Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835-845.
36. Pratt J., & McAuliffe J. (2001) The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention. Psychological Researches,65, 185-191.
37. Reder, L. M., Weber, K., Shang, J., & Vanyukov, P. M. (2003). The adaptive character of the attentional system: Statistical sensitivity in a target localization task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 631-649.
38. Richards, A. (1999). The effects of cuing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52 A, 449-463.
39. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
40. Samuel, A. G., & Weiner, S. K. (2001). Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1433-1451.
41. Sohn, M.-H., & Carlson, R. A. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1445-1460.
42. Stablum, F., Ricci, R., Pavgese, A., & Umiltá, C. (2001). Global/ local processing and negative priming: The influence of selection difficulty and stimulus exposure. Psychological Research, 65, 81-97.
43. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and shape. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
44. Theeuwes, J., Godijn, R., & Pratt, J. (2004). A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 60-64.
45. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37 A, 571-590.
46. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A, 321-343.
47. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37 A, 591-611.
48. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C., & Bastedo J. (1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 681-692.
49. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioral goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psvchology, 47 A, 809-840.
50. Todd, J. T., & Van Gelder, P. (1979). Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 625-636.
51. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400, 867-869.
52. Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, UK: Psychology.
53. Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107.
54. Yantis, S., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812-825.
55. Yantis, S., & Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 166-178.
56. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.
57. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121-134.
58. Yee, P. L., Santoro, K. E., Grey, A. L., & Woog, V. (2000). Deeper processing at target selection increases the magnitude of negative priming. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1429-1436.