Dilemmas in regional university-industry research collaboration

Local Economy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 166-179

  Gunasekara, Chrys ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Regional engagement; Regional policy; Universities; University industry research links

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745539810     PISSN: 02690942     EISSN: 14709325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02690940600608242     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., Nauwelaers, C. & Todtling, F. (Eds) (2003) Regional Innovation Policy for Small-Medium Enterprises (Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar).
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2004) Innovation and Entrepreneurship Indicators (Canberra: ABS).
3. Australian Research Council (ARC) (2006) Reports on ARC SPIRT and ARC Linkage Grant Outcomes (ARC).
4. Boucher, G., Conway, C. & Van Der Meer, E. (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region's development, Regional Studies, 37(9), pp. 887-897.
5. Chatterton, P. & Goddard, J. (2000) The response of higher education institutions to regional needs, European Journal of Education, 35(4), pp. 475-496.
6. Commonwealth of Australia (2004) Backing Australia's Ability (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia).
7. Cooke, P. (2002) Regional innovation systems: general findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), pp. 133-145.
8. Department of Education Science & Training (2002) Varieties of Excellence: Diversity, Specialisation and Regional Engagement (Canberra: DEST).
9. Ennals, R. (2005) Europe as a knowledge society: integrating universities, corporations, and government, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(4), pp. 237-248.
10. Etzkowitz, H. (2002a) Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks, Science and Public Policy, 29(2), pp. 115-128.
11. Etzkowitz, H. (2002b) MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science (London: Routledge).
12. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1997) Introduction: universities in the global knowledge economy, Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (London and Washington: Pinter), pp. 1-8.
13. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1999) The future location of research and technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, pp. 111-123.
14. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry- government relations, Research Policy, 29(2-3), pp. 109-123.
15. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. & Terra, B. (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29(2), pp. 313-330.
16. Freeman, C. (1995) The national system of innovation in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 5-24.
17. Garrett-Jones, S. (2002) From citadels to clusters: the evolution of regional innovation policies in Australia, in: T. Turpin, L. Xielin, S. Garrett-Jones & P. Burns (Eds) Innovation, Technology Policy and Regional Development (London: Edward Elgar).
18. Glasson, J. (2003) The widening local and regional development impacts of the modern universities - a tale of two cities (and north-south perspectives), Local Economy, 18(1), pp. 21-37.
19. Goddard, J. & Chatterton, P. (1999) Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: harnessing the potential of universities, Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 17, pp. 685-699.
20. Gunasekara, C. S. (2006a) Universities and place: considering the role that universities play in regions, Science and Public Policy, forthcoming.
21. Gunasekara, C. S. (2006b) Reframing the role of universities in regional innovation, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), forthcoming.
22. Guston, D. H. (2000) Retiring the social contract for science, Issues in Science and Technology, 16(4), pp. 32-36.
23. Hagen, R. (2002) Globalization, university transformation and economic regeneration: a UK case study of public/private sector partnership, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(3), pp. 205-219.
24. Hall, P. (1994) Innovation, Economics and Evolution (New York: Harvester Sheaf).
25. Hart, D. M. (1988) Forged Consensus: Science, Technology and Economic Policy in the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 1921-1953.
26. Holland, B. A. (2001) Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged university, Metropolitan Universities, 2(3), pp. 20-29.
27. Lambert, K. (2003) Review of Business-University Collaboration (London: HM Treasury).
28. Lawton Smith, H. (2003) Universities and local economic development: an appraisal of the issues and practices, Local Economy, 18(1), pp. 2-6.
29. Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (1998) The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies, Science and Public Policy, 25(3), pp. 195-203.
30. Lovering, J. (1999) Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the new regionalism, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, pp. 379-394.
31. Marginson, S. & Considine, M. (2000) The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
32. Morgan, K. (1997) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, 31, pp. 491-503.
33. Newman, P. (2000) Changing patterns of regional governance in the EU, Urban Studies, 37(5-6), pp. 895-908.
34. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1999) The Response of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Needs. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI/IMHE/ DG(96)10/REVI) (Paris: OECD).
35. Smith, B. L. R. (1990) American Science Policy Since World War II (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).
36. Sutz, J. (1997) The new role of the university in the productive sector, in: H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff (Eds) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (London and Washington: Pinter), pp. 11-20.