The generative and developmental roles of universities in regional innovation systems

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 137-150

  Gunasekara, Chrys ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 33645785123     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154306781779118     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. ALGA/NE, Australian Local Government Association/National Economics 2002. State of the Regions 2001. Canberra: Australian Local Government Association/National Economics.
2. Amin, A 1999. An institutional perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 365-378.
3. Amin, A and N Thrift 1994. Living in the global. In Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, eds. A Amin and N Thrift, pp. 1-22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bade, F and E A Nerlinger 2000. The spatial distribution of new technology-based firms: empirical results for West-Germany. Papers in Regional Science, 79, 155-176.
5. Bagchi-Sen, S, L Hall and L Petryshyn 2001. A study of university-industry linkages in the biotechnology industry: perspectives from Canada. International Journal of Biotechnology, 3(3/4), 390-409.
6. Braczyk, H, P Cooke and M Heidenreich eds. 1998. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World. London: UCL Press.
7. Braskamp, L and J Wergin 1998. Forming new social partnerships. In The Responsive University: Restructuring for High Performance, ed. W G Tierney, pp. 62-91. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Camagni, R ed. 1991. Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London: Belhaven.
9. Carlsson, B and R Stankiewicz 1995. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. In Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, ed. B Carlsson. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Castells, M 2000. The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Castells, M and P Hall 1994. Technopolis of the World: The Making of Twenty-First Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
12. Chatterton, P 2000. The cultural role of universities in the community: revisiting the university-community debate. Environment and Planning A, 32, 165-181.
13. Chatterton, P and J Goddard 2000. The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475-496.
14. CME, Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters 2003. BC's Innovation Challenge: The Road Back to World Leadership. Toronto: CME.
15. Cooke, P 1992. Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365-382.
16. Cooke, P 1998. Introduction: origins of the concept. In Regional Innovation Systems, eds. H Braczyk, P Cooke and M Heidenreich, pp. 2-27. London and Pennsylvania: UCL Press.
17. Cooke, P 2002. Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems. International Regional Science Review, 25(1), 8-37.
18. Cooke, P and K Morgan 1998. The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Cooke, P, M G Uranga and G Etxebarria 1998. Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1563-1584.
20. Crevoisier, O 1997. Financing regional endogenous development: the role of proximity capital in the age of globalization. European Planning Studies, 5, 407-416.
21. De Bresson, C and F Amesse 1991. Networks of innovators: a review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy, 20(5), 363-379.
22. DTI, Department of Trade and Industry 2003. Competing in the Global Economy. The Innovation Challenge. London: DTI.
23. Dunning, J 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45-66.
24. Edquist, C ed. 1997a. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London and Washington: Pinter.
25. Edquist, C 1997b. Systems of innovation approaches - their emergence and characteristics. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, ed. C Edquist. London and Washington: Pinter.
26. Etzkowitz, H 2002a. Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), February, 115-128.
27. Etzkowitz, H 2002b. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge.
28. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff 1997. Introduction: universities in the global knowledge economy. In Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, eds. H Etzkowitz and L Leydesdorff, pp. 1-8. London and Washington: Pinter.
29. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff 1999. The future location of research and technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, 111-123.
30. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2-3), 109-123.
31. Etzkowitz, H, A Webster, C Gebhardt and B R C Terra 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
32. EU, European Union 1999. Regional Policy: Guidelines for Programmes 2000-2006, COM (1999) 344. Brussels: EU.
33. Feldman, M and P Desrochers 2003. Research universities and local economic development: lessons from the history of the Johns Hopkins University. Industry and Innovation, 10(1), 5-24.
34. Florida, R 1995. Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527-536.
35. Florida, R 1998. Calibrating the learning region. In Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, eds. J de la Mothe and G Pacquet, pp. 19-28. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
36. Forrant, R 2001. Pulling together in Lowell: the university and the regional development process. European Planning Studies, 9(5), 613-628.
37. Freeman, C 1991. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20, 499-514.
38. Freeman, C 1995. The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5-24.
39. Freeman, C 1997. Innovation systems: city-state, national, continental and subnational. Mimeo. In Monevideo Conference. Brighton, Sussex: SPRU.
40. Freeman, C and L Soete 2000. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd edn. New York: Continuum.
41. Garlick, S 1998. 'Creative Associations in Special Places': Enhancing the Partnership Role of Universities in Building Competitive Regional Economies. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
42. Garlick, S 2000. Engaging Universities and Regions: Knowledge Contribution to Regional Economic Development in Australia. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
43. Garrett-Jones, S 2002. From citadels to clusters: the evolution of regional innovation policies in Australia. In Innovation, Technology Policy and Regional Development, eds. T Turpin, L Xielin, S Garrett-Jones and P Burns. London: Edward Elgar.
44. Goddard, J and P Chatterton 1999. Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C Government and Policy, 17, 685-699.
45. Grimes, S 2003. Ireland's emerging information economy: recent trends and future prospects. Regional Studies, 37(1), 3-14.
46. Guston, D H 2000. Retiring the social contract for science. Issues in Science and Technology, 16(4), 32-36.
47. Hagen, R 2002. Globalization, university transformation and economic regeneration: a UK case study of public/private sector partnership. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(3), 205-219.
48. Hall, P 1994. Innovation, Economics and Evolution. New York: Harvester Sheaf.
49. Hansen, N 1992. Competition, trust, and reciprocity in the development of innovative regional milieux. Papers in Regional Science, 71(2), 95-105.
50. Hart, D M 1988. Forged Consensus: Science, Technology and Economic Policy in the United States, 1921-1953. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Hassink, R 2001. Towards regionally embedded innovation support systems in South Korea? Case studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi. Urban Studies, 38, 1373-1395.
52. Hassink, R 2002. Regional innovation support systems: recent trends in Germany and East Asia. European Planning Studies, 10(2), 153-164.
53. Hirst, P 1994. Associative Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
54. Holland, B A 1999. From murky to meaningful: the role of mission in institutional change. In Colleges and Universities as Citizens, eds. R G Bringle, R Games and E A Malloy, pp. 48-73. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
55. Holland, B A 2001. Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged university. Metropolitan Universities, 2(3), 20-29.
56. Industry Canada 2002. Canada's Innovation Strategy. Toronto: Industry Canada.
57. Jessop, B 1994. Post-Fordism and the State. In Post-Fordism: A Reader, ed. A Amin, pp. 251-279. Oxford: Blackwell.
58. Kanter, R M 1995. World Class: Thriving Locally in the Global Economy, New York: Simon & Schuster.
59. Keeble, D, C Lawson, B Moore and F Wilkinson 1999. Collective learning processes, networking and 'institutional thickness' in the Cambridge region. Regional Studies, 33(4), 319-332.
60. Klofsten, M, D Jones-Evans and C Scharberg 1999. Growing the Linkoping technopole: a longitudinal study of triple helix development in Sweden. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, 125-138.
61. Koschatzky, K 2000. The Regionalization of Innovation Policy in Germany. Theoretical Foundations and Recent Experience. Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
62. Krugman, P 1997. Good news from Ireland: a geographical perspective. In International Perspectives on the Irish Economy, ed. A Gray. Dublin: Indecon.
63. Lambert, R 2003. Review of Business-University Collaboration. London: HM Treasury.
64. Lawson, C 1997. Territorial clustering and high technology innovation: from industrial districts to innovative milieux, Working Paper 54, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
65. Lawson, C and E Lorenz 1999. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4).
66. Lawton Smith, H, D Keeble, C Lawson, B Moore and F Wilkinson 1998. Contrasting regional innovation systems in Oxford and Cambridge. In Local and Regional Systems of Innovation, eds. J de la Mothe and G Pacquet. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
67. Lawton Smith, H, D Keeble, C Lawson, B Moore and F Wilkinson 2001. University-business interaction in the Oxford and Cambridge regions. Tijdshrift voor Economosche en Sociale Geografie, 92(1), 88-99.
68. Leydesdorff, L and H Etzkowitz 1998. The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), June, 195-203.
69. Lundvall, B 1992. Introduction. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, ed. B Lundvall. London: Pinter.
70. Lundvall, B and B Johnson 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23-42.
71. Lundvall, B A, B Johnson, E S Andersen and B Dalum 2001. National systems of production, innovation, and competence building. DRUID. Available at , last accessed 28 August 2002.
72. Malecki, E J 1997. Technology and Regional Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness. London: Pinter.
73. Markusen, A, Y-S Lee and S Digiovanni eds. 1999. Second-Tier Cities: Rapid Growth Beyond the Metropolis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
74. Morgan, K 1997. the learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491-503.
75. Morgan, K and C Nauwelaers 1999. A regional perspective on innovation: from theory to strategy. In Regional Innovation Strategies: The Challenge for Less-Favoured Regions, eds. K Morgan and C Nauwelaers, pp. 1-18.London: The Stationery Office.
76. Nauwelaers, C and R Wintjes 2000. SME Policy and the Regional Dimension of Innovation: Towards a New Paradigm for Innovation Policy. Maastricht: MERIT.
77. Niosi, J 2002. Regional systems of innovation: market pull and government push. In Knowledge, Clusters and Regional Innovation, eds. A Holbrook and D Wolfe, pp. 39-58. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
78. Niosi, J and T G Bas 2001. The competencies of regions: Canada's clusters in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 17, 31-42.
79. OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 1997. National Systems of Innovation. Paris: OECD.
80. OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 1999a. The Response of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Needs. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, CERI/IMHE/DG(96)10/REVI. Paris: OECD.
81. OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 1999b. Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. Paris: OECD.
82. OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2000. A New Economy: The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth. Paris: OECD.
83. OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2001. Cities and Regions in the New Learning Economy. Paris: OECD.
84. Pacquet, G 1994. Technonationalism and meso innovation systems. Draft discussion paper. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
85. Patel, P and K Pavitt 1994. National innovation systems: why they are important. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 77-95.
86. Piergiovanni, R and E Santarelli 2001. Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Regional Studies, 35(8), 697-702.
87. Porter, M E 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
88. Putnam, R 1993. The prosperous community: social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
89. Rothwell, R and M Dodgson 1992. European technology policy evolution: convergence towards SME's and regional technology transfer. Technovation, 12(4), 223-238.
90. Santoro, M D and A K Chakrabarti 2002. Firm size and technology centrality industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1163-1180.
91. Saxenian, A 1988. Regional networks and resurgence of Silicon Valley. Working Paper no 506, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley.
92. Saxenian, A 1990. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Californian Management Review, 33, 89-112.
93. Saxenian, A 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Smith, B L R 1990. American Science Policy Since World War II. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
95. Sternberg, R 2000a. University-industry relationships in Germany and their regional consequences. In Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change, ed. Z Acs, pp. 89-122. London and New York: Pinter.
96. Sternberg, R 2000b. Innovation networks and regional development: evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS). European Planning Studies, 8(4), 389-407.
97. Sutz, J 1997. The new role of the university in the productive sector. In Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, eds. H Etzkowitz and L Leydesdorff, pp. 11-20. London and Washington, Pinter.
98. Tsipouri, L 1999. Up-Grading Knowledge and Diffusing Technology in a Regional Context. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Paris.
99. Van Looy, B, K Debackere and P Andries 2003. Policies to stimulate regional innovation capabilities via university-industry collaboration: an analysis and an assessment. R&D Management, 33(2), 209-229.
100. Webster, A 1999. Technologies in transition, policies in transition: foresight in the risk society. Technovation, 19, 413-421.
101. Wever, E and E Stam 1999. Clusters of high technology SMEs: the Dutch case. Regional Studies, 33(4), 391-400.