La portée de 1'« effet Mozart ». Succès souvenirs, fausses notes et reprises

Canadian Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 125-142

  Latendresse, Catherine ^a   Larivée, Serge ^a   Miranda, Dave ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745302655     PISSN: 07085591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/cp2006004     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, U. (1999). A neurophsychological theory of positive affect and its influence of cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.
2. Bangerter, A., & Heath, C. (2004). The Mozart effect: Tracking the evolution of a scientific legend. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 605-623.
3. Campbell, D. (1997). L'effet Mozart: les bienfaits de la musique sur le corps et l'esprit. Montréal, QC: Édition Le Jour.
4. Campbell., D. (2000). L'effet Mozart sur les enfants. Montréal, QC: Édition Le Jour.
5. Carstens, C. B., Huskins, E., & Hounshell, G. W. (1995). Listening to Mozart may not enhance performance on the revised Minnesota paper form board test. Psychological Report, 77, 111-114.
6. Chabris, G. F. (1999). Prelude or requiem for the Mozart effect. Nature, 400, 826-827.
7. Hetland, L. (2000). Listening to music enhances spatialtemporal reasoning: Evidence of the Mozart Effect. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 105-148.
8. Husain, G., Thompson, W. F., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2002). Effects of musical tempo and mode on arousal, mood, and spatial abilities. Music Perception, 20, 151-171.
9. Ivanov, V. K., & Geake, J. G. (2003). The Mozart Effect and primary school children. Psychology of Music, 31, 405-143.
10. Jackson, C. S., & Tlauka, M. (2004). Route-learning and the Mozart effect. Psychology of Music, 32, 213-219.
11. Jones, S. M., & Zigler, E. (2002). The Mozart effect: Not learning from history. Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 355-372.
12. Kenealy, P., & Monsef, A. (1994). Music and IQ test. The Psychologist, 7, 346.
13. Larivée, S. (2001 ). Science contre pseudo-sciences: un combat inégal. Revue canadienne de pyscho-éducation, 30, 1-25.
14. Larivée, S. (2002). Le monde de l'éducation aux prises avec les pseudo-sciences. Revue de psycho-éducation et d'orientation, 31, 209-259.
15. Larivée, S. (2004). Pour éviter de nuire, une nouvelle rubrique. Revue de psycho-éducation, 33, 1-14.
16. Leng, X., Shaw, G. L., & Wright, E. L. (1990). Coding of musical structure and the Trion Model of cortex. Music Perception, 8, 49-62.
17. McCutcheon, L.E. (2000). Another failure to generalize the Mozart effect. Psychological Report, 87, 325-330.
18. McKelvie, P., & Low, J. (2002). Listening to Mozart does not improve children's spatial ability: Final curtains for the Mozart effect. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 241-259.
19. Mozart Effect Resources Center (2003). What is The Mozart Effect?http://www.mozarteffect.com/learn/read.html.
20. Nantais, K. M., & Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference. Psychological Science, 10(4), 370-373.
21. NEC News (1993). Researchers study shows listening to classical music may increase your IQ. NBC News Archives http://footage.net/cgi-bin/FN/director.cgi? calling=docview&table=nbc_news&pkey.
22. NBC News. (1997). Author Don Campbell discusses his book "The Mozart Effect". NBC News Archives, http://footage.net/cgibin/FN/director.cgi? calling= docview&table=nbc_news&pkey.
23. Newman, J., Rosenbach, J. H., Burns, K. L., Latimer, B. C., Matocha, H. R., & Vogt, E. R. (1995). An experimental test of the Mozart Effect: Does listening to his music improve spatial ability? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 1379-1387
24. North, A. C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1997). Experimental aesthetics and everyday music listening. Dans J. Hargreaves et A. C. North (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Music (p. 84-103). New-York: Oxford University Press.
25. Peretz, I. (2001 a). Music perception and recognition. Dans B. Rapp (Éd.), Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology (p. 521-540). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
26. Peretz, I. (2001b). Brain specialization for music. Dans R. J. Zatorre et I. Peretz (Éds.), The biological Fondation of Music (p. 153-165). New York: New-York Academy of Science.
27. Rauscher, F. H., & Shaw, G. L. (1998). Key components of the Mozart effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 835-841.
28. Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.
29. Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, K. N.(1995). Listening to Mozart enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: Towards a neurophysiological basis. Neurosciences Letters, 185, 44-47.
30. Rideout, B. E., Dougherty, S., & Wernert, L. (1998), Effect of music on spatial performance: A test of generality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 512-514.
31. Rideout, B. E., & Laubach, C. M. (1996). EEC correlates of enhanced spatial performance following exposure to music. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 427-432.
32. Rideout, B. E., & Taylor, J. (1997). Enhanced spatial performance following 10 minutes exposure to music: A replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 112-114.
33. Schellenberg, E. G. (2003). Does exposure to music have beneficial side effects? Dans I. Peretz et R. Zatorre (Éds.), The cognitive neuroscience of music (p. 430-448). New-York: Oxford University Press.
34. Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15, 511-514.
35. Shaw, G. L. (2000). Keeping Mozart in Mind. New York: Hardcover.
36. Société canadienne de psychologie (2000). Code canadien de déontologie professionnelle des Psychologues: troisième édition.
37. Steele, K. M., Bail, T. N., & Runk, R. (1997). Listening to Mozart does not enhance backwards digit span performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1179-1184.
38. Steele, K. M., Bass, K. E., & Crook, M. D. (1999). The mystery of the Mozart effect: Failure to Replicate. Psychological Science, 10(4), 366-369.
39. Steele, K. M., Brown, J. D., & Stoecker, J. A. (1999). Failure to confirme the Rauscher and Shaw description of recovery of the Mozart effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 843-848.
40. Steele, K. M., Dalla Bella, S., Peretz, I., Dunlop, T., Dawe, L. A., Humphrey, G. K., Shannon, R. A., Kirby, J. L. Jr., & Olmstead, C. G. (1999). Prelude or requiem of the Mozart effect, Nature, 400, 827.
41. Stough, C., Kerkin, B., Bates, T., & Mangan, G. (1994). Music and IQ test, The Psychologist, 7, 253.
42. Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12, 248-251.
43. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Technical Manual for The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale -Forth Edition, Chicago, IL: Riverside.
44. Twomey, A., & Esgate, A. (2002). The Mozart effect may only be demonstrable in nonmusicians. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 1013-1026.
45. Wilson, T. L., & Brown, T. L. (1997). Reexamination of the effect of Mozart's music on spatial-task performance. The Journal of Psychology, 131, 365-370.
46. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relationship of strength of stimuli to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative and Neurological Psychology, 18, 459-482.