Territory, contiguity, and international conflict: Assessing a new joint explanation

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 769-779

  Senese, Paul D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745300957     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00154.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. "Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable." American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1260-88.
2. Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam. 2000. "EUGenc: A Conceptual Manual." International Interactions 26(2):179-204.
3. Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam. 2004. The Behavioral Origins of War. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
4. Boulding, Kenneth. 1962. Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper.
5. Braumoeller, Bear. 2004. "Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms." International Organization 58(4):807-20.
6. Bremer, Stuart. 1992. "Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965." Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2):309-41.
7. Bremer, Stuart. 2000. "Who Fights Whom, When, Where, and Why?" In What Do We Know about War?, ed. John Vasquez. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
8. Diehl, Paul. 1985. "Contiguity and Military Escalation in Major Power Rivalries, 1816-1980." Journal of Politics 47(4):1203-11.
9. Diehl, Paul. 1991. "Geography and War: A Review and Assessment of the Empirical Literature." International Interactions 17(1):11-27.
10. Dixon, William, and Paul Senese. 2002. "Democracy, Disputes, and Negotiated Settlements." Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(4):547-71.
11. Friedrich, Robert. 1982. "In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations." American Journal of Political Science 26(4):797-833.
12. Gartzke, Erik. 2005. "Rich Neighbors: War, Peace, and Economic Development." Typescript. Columbia University.
13. Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and J. David Singer. 1975. "Distance and International War, 1816-1965." In Proceedings of the International Peace Research Association Fifth General Conference, ed. M. Rafiq Khan. Oslo: International Peace Research Association.
14. th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Hensel, Paul. 2000. "Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict." In What Do We Know about War?, ed. John Vasquez. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
16. Hewitt, J. Joseph, and Gary Goertz. 2005. "Fighting Chances: Choosing Populations in Conflict Research." Typescript. University of Missouri, Columbia.
17. Huth,Paul. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
18. Huth, Paul, and Todd Allee. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Jaccard, James. 2001. Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-135. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
20. Jones, Daniel, Stuart Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. "Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns." Conflict Management and Peace Science 15(2):163-213.
21. Kinsella, David, and Bruce Russett. 2002. "Conflict Emergence and Escalation in Interactive International Dyads." Journal of Politics 64(4):1045-68.
22. Lemke, Douglas. 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lemke, Douglas, and William Reed. 2001. "War and Rivalry Among Great Powers." American Journal of Political Science 45(2):457-69.
24. Morrow, James. 1989. "Capabilities, Uncertainty, and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis Bargaining." American Journal of Political Science 33(4):941-72.
25. Senese, Paul, and John Vasquez. 2003. "A Unified Explanation of Territorial Conflict: Testing the Impact of Sampling Bias, 1919-1992." International Studies Quarterly 47(2):275-98.
26. Senese, Paul, and John Vasquez. 2004. "Alliances, Territorial Disputes, and the Probability of War: Testing for Interactions." In The Scourge of War, ed. Paul Diehl. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
27. Senese, Paul, and John Vasquez. N.d. "Assessing the Steps to War." British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.
28. Siverson, Randolph, and Harvey Starr. 1991. The Diffusion of War: A Study of Opportunity and Willingness. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
29. Sprout, Harold, and Margaret Sprout. 1965. The Ecological Perspective on Human Affairs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Starr, Harvey. 1978. "'Opportunity' and 'Willingness' as Ordering Concepts in the Study of War." International Interactions 4(4):363-87.
31. Stinnett, Douglas, Jaroslav Tir, Philip Schafer, Paul Diehl, and Charles Gochman. 2002. "The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3." Conflict Management and Peace Science 19(1):58-66.
32. Vasquez, John. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Vasquez, John. 1995. "Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction, or Territoriality." Journal of Peace Research 32(3):277-93.
34. Vasquez, John. 2001. "Mapping the Probability of War and Analyzing the Possibility of Peace: The Role of Territorial Disputes." Conflict Management and Peace Science 18(2):145-74.