Investigating agonism in linguistics

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1442-1456

  Badger, Richard G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic literacy; Agonism; Applied linguistics; Argumentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745258417     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andrews R. Narrative and Argument (1989), Open University Press, Milton Keynes
2. Andrews R. Teaching and Learning Argument (1995), Cassell, London
3. Antaki C. Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts (1994), Sage Publications, London
4. Baker P. 'Unnatural Acts': discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8 1 (2004) 88-106
5. Bartels N. Another reader reacts . . . linguistics imperialism. TESOL Quarterly 38 1 (2004) 128-133
6. Belcher D.D. An argument for nonadversarial argumentation: on the relevance of the feminist critique of academic discourse to L2 writing pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing 6 1 (1997) 1-21
7. Borsley R.D., and Ingham R. Grow your own linguistics? On some applied linguists' views of the subject. Lingua 112 1 (2002) 1-6
8. Borsley R.D., and Ingham R. More on 'some applied linguists': a response to Stubbs. Lingua 113 (2003) 193-196
9. Borsley R.D., and Ingham R. A response to Schmitz. Lingua 114 2 (2004) 101-103
10. Bruton A. From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. ELT Journal 56 3 (2002) 280-288
11. Bruton A. Recoding and reorganizing grammatical form by meaning: the English genitive as an example. System 30 2 (2002) 237-250
12. Bruton A. When and how the language development in TBI?. ELT Journal 56 3 (2002) 296-297
13. Ceccarelli L. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson (2001), University of Chicago Press, London
14. Coulthard M. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis (1985), Longman, London
15. De Beaugrande R. Interpreting the discourse of HG Widdowson: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 22 1 (2001) 104-121
16. Freeman D., and Johnson K.E. Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 32 3 (1998) 397-417
17. Freeman D., and Johnson K.E. Readers react . . . common misconceptions about the quiet revolution. TESOL Quarterly 38 1 (2004) 119-127
18. Halliday M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1994), Edward Arnold, London
19. Hunston S. Professional conflict-disagreement in academic discourse. In: Baker M., Francis G., and Tognini-Bonelli E. (Eds). Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (1993), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 115-136
20. Hyland K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2000), Longman, London
21. Johnson K.E., and Golombek P.R. "Seeing" Teacher Learning. TESOL Journal 37 4 (2003) 729-737
22. Kress G. Texture and meaning. In: Andrews R. (Ed). Narrative and Argument (1989), Open University Press, Milton Keynes 9-21
23. Lakoff R.T. The language war (2000), University of California Press, London
24. Lakoff R.T. The new incivility: threat or promise?. In: Aitchison J., and Lewis D.M. (Eds). New Media Language (2003), Routledge, London 36-44
25. Muchisky D., and Yates R. The authors respond . . . defending the discipline, field, and profession. TESOL Quarterly 38 1 (2004) 134-140
26. Partington A. The Linguistics of Political Argument: The spin-doctor and the wolf-pack at the White House (2003), Routledge, London
27. Schmitz J.R. Taking linguistics seriously: on the varied dimensions of applied linguistics. Lingua 113 (2003) 95-99
28. Scott M. Wordsmith Tools (Version 3.00) (1999), Mike Scott and OUP, Oxford
29. Seidlhofer B. Controversies in Applied Linguistics (2003), OUP, Oxford
30. Singh P., and Doherty C. Global cultural flows and pedagogic dilemmas: teaching in the global university contact zone. TESOL Quarterly 38 1 (2004) 4
31. Skehan P. A non-marginal role for tasks. ELT Journal 56 3 (2002) 289-295
32. Stubbs M. On text and corpus analysis: a reply to Borsley and Ingham. Lingua 112 (2002) 7-11
33. Tannen D. The Argument Culture: Changing the Way We Argue (1998), Virago, London
34. Tannen D. Agonism in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (2002) 1651-1669
35. Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument (1958), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
36. Toulmin S. Return to Reason (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
37. Widdowson H.G. On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21 1 (2000) 3-25
38. Widdowson H.G. Scoring points by critical analysis: a reaction to beaugrande. Applied Linguistics 22 2 (2001) 266-272
39. Yates R., and Muchisky D. On reconceptualizing teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 37 1 (2003) 135-147