Lowering sample size in comparative analyses can indicate a correlation where there is none: Example from Rensch's rule in primates

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1346-1351

  Lindenfors, P ^a   Tullberg, B S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Allometry; Phylogenetic comparative analyses; Sexual size dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; ANCESTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATE; SAMPLE SIZE;

ANIMALS; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATES; SAMPLE SIZE;

PRIMATES;

EID: 33745205836     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01083.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abouheif, E. & Fairbairn, D.J. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch's rule. The American Naturalist 149: 540-562.
2. Alexander, R.D., Hoogland, J.L, Howard, R.D., Noonan, K.M. & Sherman, P.W. 1979. Sexual dimorphism and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates and humans. In: Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behaviors: an Anthropological Perspective. (N. Chagnon, & W. Irons, eds), pp. 402-435. North Scituate Massachusetts, Duxbury.
3. Atchley, W.R., Gaskins, C.T. & Andersson, D. 1976. Statistical properties of ratios. I. empirical results. Systematic Zoology 25: 137-148.
4. Cameron, E. Z. 1998. Is suckling behaviour a useful predictor of milk intake? A review. Animal Behaviour 56: 521-532.
5. Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Harvey, P.H. 1977. Primate ecology and social organisation. Journal of Zoology 183: 1-39.
6. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Harvey, P.H. & Rudder, B. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269: 797-800.
7. Fairbairn, D.J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659-687.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The Amercian Naturalist 125: 1-15.
9. Ford, S.M. 1993. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in body weight in platyrrhines. American Journal of Primatology 34: 221-244.
10. Garland, T. Jr., Dickerman, A.W., Janis, C.M. & Jones, J.A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42: 265-292.
11. Gaulin, S.J.C. & Sailer, L.D. 1984. Sexual dimorphism in weight among the primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. International Journal of Primatology 5: 515-535.
12. Harvey, P.H. & Harcourt, A.H. 1984. Sperm competition, testes size, and breeding system in primates. In: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. (R. L. Smith, ed), pp. 589-659. Academic Press, London.
13. Kappeler, P.M. 1990. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. American Journal of Primatology 21: 201-214.
14. Lande, R. 1985. Genetic and evolutionary aspects of allometry. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. (W. L. Jungers ed), pp. 21-32. Plenum Press, London.
15. Lande, R. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In: Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. (J. W. Bradbury, & M. B. Anderson, eds.), pp. 83-94. Chichester, Wiley.
16. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
17. Leutenegger, W. 1978. Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body size and breeding system in primates. Nature 272: 610-611.
18. Leutenegger, W. & Cheverud, J. 1982. Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: Ecological and size variables. International Journal of Primatology 3: 387-402.
19. Lindenfors, P. 2002. Sexually antagonistic selection on primate size. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 595-607.
20. Lindenfors, P. & Tullberg, B.S. 1998. Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 413-447.
21. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Mitani, J.C., Gros-Louis, J. & Richards, A.F. 1996. Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. The American Naturalist 147: 966-980.
23. Oftedal, O.T. 1984. Milk composition, milk yield and energy output at peak lactation: a comparative review. Symposia of the Zoology Society of London 51: 33-85.
24. Ralls, K. 1977. Sexual dimorphism in mammals: avian models and unanswered questions. The American Naturalist 111: 917-938.
25. Ranta, E., Laurila, A. & Elmberg, J. 1994. Reinventing the wheel: analysis of sexual dimorphism in body size. Oikos 70: 313-321.
26. Reeve, J.P. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2001. Predicting the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 244-254.
27. Reiss, M.J. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in body size: Are larger species more dimorphic? Journal of Theoretical Biology 121: 163-172.
28. Rensch, B. 1950. Die Abhängigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergröße. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 1: 58-69.
29. Rensch, B. 1959. Evolution Above the Species Level. Methuen and Co. Ltd., London.
30. Smith, R.J. 1999. Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution 36: 423-459.
31. Smith, R.J & Cheverud, J.M. 2002. Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body mass: a phylogenetic analysis of Rensch's rule in primates. International Journal of Primatology 23: 1095-1135.
32. Smith, R.J & Jungers, W.L. 1997. Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution 32: 523-559.
33. Smith, R.J. & Leigh, S.R. 1998. Sexual dimoprhism in primate neonatal body mass. Journal of Human Evolution 34: 173-201.
34. Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., Wrangham, R.W. & Struhsaker, T.T. (eds) 1987. Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
35. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
36. Thorén, S., Lindenfors, P. & Kappeler, P.M. 2006. Phylogenetic analyses of dimorphism in primates: evidence for stronger selection on canine size than on body size. The American Journal of Physical Anthropology. In press.