Educational factors contributing to cochlear implant benefit in children

International Congress Series

Volumn 1254, Issue C, 2003, Pages 307-312

  Geers, Ann ^a,b   Brenner, Chris ^a   Nicholas, Johanna ^a   Tye Murray, Nancy ^a   Tobey, Emily ^b  

^a CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Deafness; Language; Outcomes; Reading; Speech

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745192362     PISSN: 05315131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0531-5131(03)01114-2     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Geers, A.E., Brenner, C., Nicholas, J., Uchanski, R., Tye-Murray, N., Tobey, E., Rehabilitation factors contributing to implant benefit in children. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 11:5 (2002), 127–130.
2. Geers, A.E., Brenner, C., Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by 5 years of age. Ear and Hear 1:Suppl. 24 (2002), 2S–14S.
3. Kirk, K.I., Pisoni, D.B., Osberger, M.J., Lexical effects of spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 16 (1995), 470–481.
4. Bamford, J., Wilson, I., Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists. Bench, J., Bamford, J.M., (eds.) Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing Impaired Children, 1979, Academic Press, London, 147–187.
5. McGarr, N., The intelligibility of deaf speech to familiar and unfamiliar listeners. J. Speech Hear. Res., 1983, 451–458.
6. Scarborough, H.S., Index of productive syntax. Appl. Psycholinguist. 11 (1990), 1–22.
7. Woodcock, R.W., Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. 1987, DLM Teaching Resources, Allen, TX.
8. Dunn, L.M., Markwardt, F.C., Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. 1989, American Guidance Service, Allen, TX.