Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: Stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 637-644

  Perez, F ^a,b   Schoumacher, M ^a   Peli, J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b UFR d'Odontologie   (France)

Author keywords

Controlled torque; Root canal preparation; Rotary nickel titanium file; Simulated canal; Stainless steel file

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL MODELS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM;

EID: 24044451565     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00997.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Al-Omari MAO, Bryant S, Dummer PMH (1997) Comparison of two stainless steel files to shape simulated root canals. International Endodontic Journal 30, 35-45.
2. Bishop K, Dummer PMH (1997) A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals. International Endodontic Journal 30, 25-34.
3. Bonetti Filho I, Miranda Esberard R, de Toledo Leonardo R, del Rio CE (1998) Microscopic evaluation of three endodontic files pre- and post-instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics 24, 461-4.
4. Briseno Marroquin B, Pistorius A, Willershausen-Zonnchen B (1996) Canal transportation caused by a new instrumentation technique and three standard techniques. Journal of Endodontics 22, 406-9.
5. Bryant ST, Thompson SA, Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH (1998a) Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1. International Endodontic Journal 31, 275-81.
6. Bryant ST, Thompson SA, Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH (1998b) Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized in simulated root canals: Part 2. International Endodontic Journal 31, 282-9.
7. Calberson FLG, Deroose CAJG, Hommez GMG, Raes H, De Moore RJG (2002) Shaping ability of GT® Rotary files in simulated resin root canals. International Endodontic Journal 35, 607-14.
8. Fariniuk LF, Baratto-Filho F, Guerisoli DMZ, Barbizam JVB, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2001) Modeling capacity of ENDOflash in simulated root canals. Brazilian Dental Journal 12, 39-42.
9. Fariniuk LF, Baratto-Filho F, Miranda da Cruz-Filho A, Sousa-Neto MD (2003) Histologic analysis of the cleaning capacity of mechanical endodontic instruments activated by the ENDOflash system. Journal of Endodontics 29, 651-3.
10. Hata GI, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T (2002) A comparison of shaping ability using Profile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. Journal of Endodontics 28, 316-21.
11. Hülsmann M, Gressmann G, Schäfers F (2003) A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. International Endodontic Journal 36, 358-66.
12. Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY et al. (2000) Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. Journal of Endodontics 26, 719-23.
13. Martin G, Blaskovic-Subat V (1997) Preparation of simulated root canals using the Macfile, Canal Master U and K-Flexofile. International Endodontic Journal 30, 160-6.
14. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara J, Masser HH (2000) Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 26, 161-8.
15. Schäfer E (2001) Shaping ability of 642 rotary NiTi instrument and stainless steel hand K flexofile in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 92, 215-20.
16. Schäfer E, Florek H (2003) Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal 36, 199-207.
17. Schäfer E, Lohmann D (2002) Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal 35, 505-13.
18. Schäfer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W (1995) Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2: Instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of Endodontics 21, 493-7.
19. Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC (1997) A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. Journal of Endodontics 23, 503-7.
20. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH (1997a) Shaping ability of Profile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. International Endodontic Journal 30, 1-7.
21. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH (1997b) Shaping ability of Profile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. International Endodontic Journal 30, 8-15.
22. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH (2000a) Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. International Endodontic Journal 33, 248-54.
23. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH (2000b) Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. International Endodontic Journal 33, 255-61.
24. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH (2002) Shaping ability of Profile .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. International Endodontic Journal 30, 1-7.
25. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ (1975) The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. Journal of Endodontics 1, 255-62.
26. Zuolo ML, Walton RE (1997) Instrument deterioration with usage: Nickel-titanium versus stainless steel. Quintessence International 28, 397-402.