Netskills and the current state of beliefs and practices in student learning: An assessment and recommendations

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 425-438

  Murray, Liam ^a   Hourigan, Triona ^a   Jeanneau, Catherine ^b   Chappell, Dominic ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING STRATEGIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH PRACTICES; VALIDATION PURPOSES;

DATA REDUCTION; STUDENTS; SURVEYING; TEACHING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745183519     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00475.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allen, L. (2000). Information literacy in higher education: a revolution in learning. http://www.pages. drexel.edu/~la3 5/ Information_Literacy_in_Higher_Education.html (retrieved 21 November 2003)
2. Barnes, A. & Murray, L. (1999). Diverse and reverse management in ICT to support knowledge of language. In CiLT CALL Conference Proceedings CALL Report 15, (pp. 135-145), December, Warwick University, England.
3. Chou, C. (2003). Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology 34, 265-279.
4. Fresen, J. (2002). Quality in web-supported learning. Educational Technology 42, 28-32.
5. Hall, R. & Dalgleish, A. (1999). Undergraduates' experiences of using the World Wide Web as an information resource. IETI 36, 334-345.
6. King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. Internet and Higher Education 5, 231-246.
7. Leckie, G. J. (1996). Desperately seeking citations: uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. Journal of Academic Librarianship 22, 201-208.
8. Lévy, P. (1997). Cyberculture. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.
9. MacDonald, J., Heap, N. & Mason, R. (2001). "Have I learnt it?": evaluating skills for resource based study using electronic resources. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 419-434.
10. McDowell, L. (2002). Electronic information resources in undergraduate education: an exploratory study of opportunities for student learning and independence. British Journal of Educational Technology 33, 255-266.
11. McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. Internet and Higher Education 6, 159-177.
12. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education 41, 271-290.
13. Newton, R., Marcella, R. & Middleton, I. (1998). Netlearning: creation of an online directory of Internet learning resources. British Journal of Educational Technology 29, 173-176.
14. O'Donoghue, J., Singh, G.& Dorward, L. (2001). Virtual education in universities: a technological imperative. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 511-523.
15. Oliver, R. & Omari, A. (2001). Student responses to collaborating and learning in a Web-based environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17, 34-47.
16. Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media 29, 69-77.
17. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: the key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.
18. Sellani, R. J. & Harrington, W. (2002). Addressing administrator/faculty conflict in an academic online environment. Internet and Higher Education 5, 131-145.
19. Slaouti, D. (2002). The World Wide Web for academic purposes: old study skills for new? English for Specific Purposes 21, 105-124.
20. Sloman, M. (2001). The e-learning revolution: from propositions to action. London: CIPD.
21. Song, L., Singleton, E. S. & Hill, J. R. (2004). Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education 7, 59-70.
22. Sonwalkar, N. (2002). A new methodology for evaluation: the pedagogical rating of online courses. Syllabus 15, 18-21.