Research in environmental design: Definitions and limits

Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 160-175

  Forsyth, Ann ^a   Crewe, Katherine ^b  

^a Metropolitan Design Center   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; PLANNING METHOD;

EID: 33745144322     PISSN: 07380895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Akkerman A (2000) Harmonies of urban design and discords of city-form: Urban aesthetics in the rise of western civilization. Journal of Urban Design 5(3):267-290.
2. Booth W, Colomb G, Williams J (1995) The craft of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Boyer E (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Brazel A, Crewe K (2002) Preliminary test of a surface heat island model (SHIM) and implications for a desert urban environment. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 34(2):98-105.
5. Chapman DW, Larkham PJ (1999) Urban design, urban quality, and the quality of life: Reviewing the Department of the Environment's urban design campaign. Journal of Urban Design 4(2):211-228.
6. Checkoway B (1998) Professionally related public service as applied scholarship. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17(4):358-360.
7. Choi J (1999) The traditional characteristics reflected in the plan of modern apartment houses in Korea. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 16(1):65-77.
8. Coyne R, Snodgrass A (1993) Cooperation and individualism in design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(2):163-174.
9. Crewe K, Forsyth A (2003) LandSCAPES: A typology of approaches to landscape architecture. Landscape Journal 22(1):37-53.
10. Cross N (Ed.) (1984) Developments in design methodology. Chichester, NY: Wiley.
11. Day K (1999) Introducing gender to the critique of privatized public space. Journal of Urban Design 4(2):155-178.
12. Dehaene M (2002) Broadacre City: The city in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 19(2):91-109.
13. Diamond R (2002) Defining scholarship for the twenty-first century. In K Zahorski (Ed.), Scholarship in the postmodern era. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, pp. 73-79.
14. Dovey K, Dickson S (2002) Architecture and freedom? Programmatic innovation in the work of Koolhaas/OMA. Journal of Architectural Education 56(1):5-13.
15. Forsyth A, Lu H, McGirr P (2001) Plazas, streets, and markets: Puerto Ricans and urban spaces in northern climates. Landscape Journal 20(1):62-76.
16. Gage S, Hunt GR, Linden PF (2001) Top-down ventilation and cooling. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 18(4):286-301.
17. Grant J (2001) The dark side of the grid: Power and urban design. Planning Perspectives 16:219-241.
18. Groat L, Wang D (2002) Architectural research methods. New York: John Wiley.
19. Hack G (1984) Research for urban design. In J Snyder (Ed.), Architectural research. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 125-145.
20. Heath T, Smith S, Lim B (2000) The complexity of tall building facades. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17(3):206-220.
21. Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Humphreys SC (1997) Introduction: Let's hear it for the magpies. In SC Humphreys (Ed.), Cultures of scholarship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1-20.
23. Imrie R (2003) Architects' conceptions of the human body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21(1):47-65.
24. Isaacs R (2000) The urban picturesque: An aesthetic experience of urban pedestrian places. Journal of Urban Design 5(2):145-180.
25. Joroff M, Morse S (1984) A proposed framework for the emerging field of architectural research. In J Snyder (Ed.), Architectural research. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 15-28.
26. Kirk J, Miller M (1986) Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.
27. Linzey M (2001) On the secondness of architectural intuition. Journal of Architectural Education 55(1):43-50.
28. Locke L, Silverman S, Spirduso W (1998) Reading and understanding research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29. Love T (2004) Australia (West) Design Research Society, Quarterly Council Report 6(2). http://www.dmu.ac.uk/In/4dd/DRS%20QCR-6-v2.doc. Site accessed July 2004.
30. Neckar LM (2000) Castle Howard: An original landscape architecture. Landscape Journal 19(1-2):20-45.
31. Peirce CS (1992) Reasoning and the logic of things: The Cambridge conferences lectures of 1898. Edited by KL Ketner. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Rice RE (2002) Beyond scholarship reconsidered: Toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members. In K Zahorski (Ed.), Scholarship in the postmodern era. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
33. Sanoff H (1991) Visual research methods in design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
34. Seidel AD (1981) Underutilized research: Researchers'and decision makers' conceptions of information quality. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 3(2):233-248.
35. Snyder J (Ed.) (1984a) Architectural research. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
36. Snyder J (1984b) Introduction. In J Snyder (Ed.), Architectural research. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 1-14.
37. Stevens G (1998) The favored circle. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Symes M, Pauwels S (1999) The diffusion of innovations in urban design: The case of sustainability in the Hulme development guide. Journal of Urban Design 4(l):97-118.
39. University of Woollongong (1993) Definition of research. http://www.uow. edu.au/admin/personnel/conditions/research_defn.html. Site accessed July 2004.