Progresses of ecological risk assessment

Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1558-1566

  Chen, Hui ^a,b   Liu, Jin Song ^b   Cao, Yu ^d   Li, Shuang Cheng ^c   Ouyang, Hua ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

^b HEBEI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Landscape; Large scale; Management decision; Region; Regional ecological risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745144263     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Zhong Z L, Zeng G M, Yang C P. The development of environmental risk assessment research. Advances in Environmental Science,1996,4(6):17 - 21.
2. Wayne G Landis. Twenty years before and hence; ecological risk assessment at multiple scales with multiple stressors and multiple endpoints. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9: 1317 - 1326.
3. Thorteical E C. Possibilities and consequences of major accidents in large nuclear power plants, DOC. 740,U.S.A.E.C., Washington D C,1975.
4. Wang B Z, et al. Translation. Foreign environmental science and technology. 1985, (Suppliment): 111.
5. Beanlands G E and Duiker P N. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resources and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N S, Canada, 1983.
6. CEQ(Council on Environmental Quality). Regulation for implementing the procedural provision of the National Environmental Policy Act.40CRF Parts 1500 - 1508. US Government Printing Office. Washington, D C, USA, 1986.
7. Carns J Jr, Dickson K L, and Maki A W eds. Estimating the hazard of chemical substances to aquatic life. STP657. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia. PA. USA, 1978.
8. Dickson K L, Maki, A W, and Cairns J Jr. eds. Analyzing the hazard evaluation process. American Fisheries Society, Washington, D C, USA,1979.
9. EPA(US Environmental Protection Agency). Hazard evaluation division standard evaluation procedure: ecological risk assessment. EPA 540-9-85-001. Office of Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC, USA, 1986.
10. O'Neill P V, Gardner R H, Barnthouse L W, et al. Ecosystem risk analysis: A new methodology. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 1982,1(1):67 - 77.
11. Barnthouse L W, Suter G W I I, Rosen A E, et al. Estimating responses of fish populations to toxic contamination. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 1987,6(8):11 - 24.
12. Suter G W I I, Vaughan D S, Gardner R H. Risk assessment by Analysis of extrapolation error, a demonstration for effects of pollutants on fish. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,1983,2(3):69 - 78.
13. Suter G W I I, Barnthouse L W, Baes C F I I I, et al. Environmental risk analysis for direct coal liquefaction. ORNL/TM-9074. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. 1984.
14. Barnthouse L W, Suter II G W, and Rosen A E. Inferring population-level significance from individual-level effects: an extrapolation from fisheries science to ecotoxicology. In: Suter GW II and Lewis MA (eds). Aquatic Toxicology and Environmental Fates, 1998,11:289 - 300. ASTM STP 1007. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
15. Glenn W, Suter II, Susan B, Norton, and Lawrence W. Barnthouse. The evolution of frameworks for ecological risk assessment from the Red Book Ancestor. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9:1349 - 1360.
16. USEPA: Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Fed. Regist, 1986,51:33992 - 34003.
17. USEPA: Guidelines for mutagenicity risk assessment. Fed. Regist,1986,51:34006 - 34021.
18. USEPA: Guidelines for the Health risk assessment of chemical mixture. Fed. Regist,1986,51: 34014 - 34025.
19. USEPA: Guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment. Fed. Regist,1986,51:34028 - 34040.
20. USEPA: Guidelines for exposure assessment. Fed. Regist,1986,51:34042 - 34054.
21. USEPA: Superfund health assessment manual. EPA 540/1/6/060, 1986.
22. USEPA: Guidelines for health assessment of systemic toxicants. Fed Regist. (in draft),1988.
23. USEPA: Proposed guidelines for assessing female reproductive risk. Fed. Regist,1988, 53:24834 - 24847.
24. USEPA(1988):Proposed guidelines for assessing male reproductive risk, Fed. Regist,53:24850 - 24860.
25. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Risk assessment in federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington D C, 1983.
26. Johnson A R. Evaluation ecosystem response to toxicant stress: A state space approach. In: Adams W J, Chapman G A, and Landis W G eds. Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment,1988,10:275 - 285. ASTP STP 971.American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, P A, USA.
27. Hunsaker C T, Graham R L, Suter G W II, et al. Assessing ecological risk on regional scale. Environmental Management,1990,14:325 - 332.
28. NRC(National Research Council). Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1983.
29. NRC(National Research Council). Issues in risk assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, D C, USA,1993.
30. EPA(US Environmental Protection Agency). Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA 630-R-92-001. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D C, USA, 1992
31. EPA(US Environmental Protection Agency). Stressor identification guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/822-B-00/025. Office of Water, Washington, D C, USA,2000.
32. Sergeant A. Management objectives for ecological risk assessment - developments at US EPA. Environmental Science Policy,2000,3(2):95 - 98.
33. WHO(World Health Organization). Report on integrated risk assessment, WHO/IPCS/IRA/01/12. Geneva, Switzerland,2001.
34. Suter G W II, Vermier T, Munns W R Jr, et al. Framework for the integration of health and ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9:281 - 302.
35. EPA(US Environmental Protection Agency). Guidelines for ecological risk assessment EPA 630-R-95-002F. Office of Water, Washington, D C, USA.1998.
36. Adam S M, Bevelhimer M S, Greeley M S Jr, et al. The ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 6. Bioindicators of fish population health. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,1999, 18(4):628 - 640.
37. Baron L A, Sample B E, and Suter G W I I. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir:5. Aerial insectivorous wildlife, Environmental Toxicology Chemistry.1999, 18(4):621 - 627.
38. Cook R B, Suter G W I I, and Sain E R. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir:1. Introduction and background. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,1999, 18(4):581 - 588.
39. Jones D S, Barnthouse L W, Suter G W I I, et al. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir:3. Introduction and background. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,1999, 18(4):599 - 609.
40. Sample B E, and Suter G W I I. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir:4. Introduction and background. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 1999, 18(4):610 - 620.
41. Suter G W I I, Barnthouse L W, Efroymson R A, et al. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir:2. Introduction and background. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,1999,18(4): 610 - 620.
42. Valiela I, Tomasky G. Hauxwell J, et al. Producing sustainability: management and risk assessment of land-derived nitrongen loads to shallow estuaries, Ecological Application,2000,10:1006 - 1023.
43. Cormier S M, Smith M, Norton S, et al. Assessing ecological risk in watershed: A case study of problem formulation in the Big Darby Creek watershed, Ohio, USA. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,1999,19:1082 - 1096.
44. Kapustka L A and Landis G W. Ecology: the science versus the myth. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,1998,4:829 - 838.
45. Matthews R A, Metthews G B, and Landis W G. Application of community level toxicity testing to environmental risk assessment. In: Newman MC and Strojan C L, eds. Risk Assessment: Logic and Measurement. 1998:225-253. AnnArbor Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
46. Wayne G. and Landis. Uncertainty in the extrapolation from individual effects to impacts upon landscape. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8 (1):193 - 204.
47. Rachel N. Wallack and Bruce K. Hope. quantitative consideration of ecosystem characteristics in an ecological risk assessment: A case study. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8(7): 1805 - 1814.
48. Willis R D, Hull R N and Marshall L J. Consideration regarding the use of reference area and baseline information in ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9(7): 1645 - 1653.
49. Fu Z Y, Xu X G. Regional ecological risk assessment. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2001,16(2):267 - 271.
50. Power M, McCarty L S. Trends in the development of ecological risk assessment and management frameworks. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 2002,8(1):7 - 18.
51. Norton S, Cormier S, Suter G I I, et al. Determining probable causes of ecological impairment in the Little Scioto River, Ohio, USA: part 1. Listing candidate causes and analyzing evidence. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry,2002,21:1112 - 1124.
52. Chapman P M, McDonaild B, and Lawrence G. Weight-of-evidence issues and frameworks for sediment quality (and other) assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8:1489 - 1515.
53. Forbes V and Calow P. applying Weight-of-evidence in retrospective ecological risk assessment when quantitative data are limited. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8:1625 - 1639.
54. Wayne G. Landis. The frontier in ecological risk assessment at Expanding spatial and temporal scales. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9:1415 - 1424.
55. Moraes R and Molander S. A Procedure for tiered assessment of risks (PRTER). Ph. D. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenborg, Sweden. 2002.
56. Menzie C, Hope-Henning M, Cura J, et al. Special report of the Massachusetts weight-of-evidence workgroup: A weight-of-evidence approach for evaluatiing ecological risks. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,1996,2:277 - 304.
57. Burton G Jr, Batley G, Chapman P M, et al. Weight-of-evidence framework for assessing sediment (or other) contamination: Improving certainty in the decision-making process. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2002,8:1675 - 1696.
58. Burton G, Chapman P M, and Smith E. Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002,8:1657 - 1673.
59. Landis W G, Duncan P B, Hayes E H, Markiewicz A J, Thomas J F. A regional retrospective assessment of the potential stressors causing the decline of the Cherry Point Pacific herring run. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2004, 10(2):271 - 297.
60. Rosana Moraes and Sverker Molander. A procedure for ecological tiered assessment of risks (PETER). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2004,10 (2):349 - 371.
61. Rosana Moraes, Wayne G. Landis and Sverker Molander. Regional risk assessment of a Brazilian Rain Forest. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002,8(7):1779 - 1803.
62. Xu J B, Wang Y. Ecological risk assessment. Songliao Journal,1999,2:10 - 13.
63. Lawrence V. Tannenbaum. Can ecological receptors really be at risk? Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2003,9(1):5 - 13.
64. Burton Allen G, Jr, Peter M Chapman, and Eric P Smith. Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Human and Ecological Assessment, 2002,8(7):1657 - 1673.
65. Walker R, Landis W, Brown P. Developing a regional risk assessment: A case study of a Tasmania agricultureal catchment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2001,7(2):417 - .
66. Angela M Obery and Wayne G Landis. A regional multiple stressor risk assessment of the Codorus Creek watershed appling the relative risk model. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002,8(2): 405 - 428.
67. Hayes E H, Landis W G. Regional ecological assessment of a near shore marine environment: Cherry Point, WA. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2002,10(2):299 - 325.
68. Fu Z Y, XU X G, Lin H P, et al. Regional ecological risk assessment of in the Liaohe River Delta wetlands. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,70(3): 253 - 262.
69. Mao X L, Ni J R. Recent Progress of Ecological Risk Assessment. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2005,41(4):646 - 654.