Disability, bioethics, and rejected knowledge

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 269-283

  Newell, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Disability; Politics; Rejected knowledge

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; EUTHANASIA; KNOWLEDGE; LIFE EVENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; POLITICS; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ATTITUDE TO DEATH; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DISABLED PERSONS; EUTHANASIA; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; PREJUDICE;

EID: 33745138774     PISSN: 03605310     EISSN: 17445019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03605310600712901     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Abberley, P. (1987). 'The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability,' Disability, Handicap & Society, 2(1). 5-20.
2. Anon. (1996, September 27). 'Bob Dent's Letter,' The Mercury, 71.
3. Asch, A. (1998). 'Distracted by disability,' Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 7(1), 77-88.
4. Asch, A. (2001). 'Disability, bioethics, and human rights,' in G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 297-325). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., & Wikler, A. (2000). From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cook, M. (2002). 'Designer babies? Don't leave it to bureaucrats to decide,' The Age, April 23.
7. Davis, A. (1985, October 31). 'Yes, the baby should live,' New Scientist, 54.
8. Davis, A. (1989). From Where I Sit. London: Triangle.
9. Disabled Peoples' International Europe. (2000). The right to live and be different, declaration at Solihull, United Kingdom, 12-13 February 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.independentliving.org/docs1/dpi022000. html〉. Accessed February 2, 2004.
10. Drake, S & Johnson, M. (2005, February 12). Movies about disabled keep myths alive, Sun Times [Online]. Available: http://www.suntimes.com/output/ otherviews/cst-edt-ref12.html. Accessed February 14, 2005.
11. Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling Policies? London: Falmer Press.
12. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (1997). 'Residential consumers & 'rejected knowledge': Exploring and acknowledging the margins in broadband services in Australia,' Telecommunications Policy, 21(4). 317-328.
13. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2004). 'Uniting the nation?: Disability, stem cells, and the Australian media,' Disability & Society, 19(1). 47-60.
14. Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2005). Disability in Australia - Exposing a Social Apartheid. Sydney: UNSW Press.
15. Hockenberry, J. (1996). Declarations of Independence: War Zones and Wheelchairs. London: Penguin.
16. Kelly, J. (2002, September 21). 'Designer baby go ahead,' Herald Sun [Online]. Available: http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5139595%255E2, 00.html. Accessed September 22, 2002.
17. Komesaroff, L. (2003) 'Deaf education and underlying structures of power in communication,' Australian Journal of Communication, 30(3). 43-59.
18. Kuczewski, M.G. (2001). 'Disability: An agenda for bioethics,' American Journal of Bioethics, 1(3). 36-44.
19. Lane, H. (1984). When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf. New York: Vintage.
20. McNeill, P. M. (2002). 'Ethics committees in Australia and New Zealand: A critique,' Politeia, 67. 113-119.
21. Newell, C. (1996). 'Critical reflections on euthanasia and people with disability,' Australian Quarterly, 68(3). 48-56.
22. Newell, C. (1999a). 'Critical reflections on disability, difference and genetic testing,' in O'Sullivan, G., Sharman, E. & Short, S (Eds.), Goodbye Normal Gene (pp 58-71). Sydney: Pluto Press.
23. Newell, C. (1999b). 'The social nature of disability, disease and genetics,' Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2). 172-175.
24. Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding Disability from Theory to Practice. Houndmills: MacMillan Press.
25. Parens, E. & Asch, A. (1999). 'The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations,' Hastings Center Report, Sept.-Oct, Special Supplement, S1-S22.
26. Parsons, I. (1999). Cripples, Coons, Fags and Fems: A Look at How Four Human Rights Movements Have Fought Prejudice. Geelong: Villamanta Legal Service.
27. Richards, E. (1991). Vitamin C and Cancer. London: MacMillan.
28. Shakespeare, T. (1995). 'Back to the future? New genetics and disabled people,' Critical Social Policy, 44/45 (Autumn). 22-35.
29. Shakespeare, T. (1998). 'Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality,' Disability & Society. 13(5). 665-681.
30. Shakespeare, T. (1999). 'Manifesto for genetic justice,' Social Alternatives, 18(1). 29-32.
31. Singer, P., & Kuhse, H. (1985). Should the Baby Live?: The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Wallis, R, (Ed.). (1979). On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. Keele, Staffordshire: University of Keele.
33. Warnock, M. (1999). 'The politicisation of medical ethics,' Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 33(5). 474-478.
34. Wertz, D.C. (2000). 'Drawing lines: Notes for policymakers,' in E. Parens & A. Asche (Eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (pp. 261-287). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.