Disability: An agenda for bioethics

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 36-44

  Kuczewski, Mark G ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

ADA; Bioethics; Casuistry; Communitarianism; Disability; Disability studies; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABLED PERSON; ETHICIST; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BIOETHICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNICATION; DISABLED PERSONS; ETHICISTS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREJUDICE; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PUBLIC POLICY; REHABILITATION;

EID: 0035383402     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601750418026     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albrecht, G. L., and P J. Devlinger. 1999. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine 48:977-988.
2. Asch, A. 1998. Distracted by disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7(1): 77-87.
3. Barnard, D., A. Towers, P Boston, and Y Lambrinidou. 1999. Crossing over: Narratives of palliative care. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Byock, I. 1997. Dying well: The prospect for growth at the end of life. New York: Riverhead Books.
5. Caplan, A. L., D. Callahan, and J. Haas. 1987. Ethical and policy issues in rehabilitation medicine. Hastings Center Report 17(Supplement): S1-S19.
6. Capron, A. M. 1992. Oregon's disability: Principles or politics? Hastings Center Report 22(6): 18-20.
7. Churchill, L. R. 1994. Self-interest and universal healthcare: Why well-insured Americans should support coverage for everyone. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. Cushman, L. A., and M. P Dijkers. 1990. Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: Staff perceptions and patient realities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 71:191-196.
9. Daniels, N. 1994. Just healthcare. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Davis, L. J. 2000. My sense of silence: Memoirs of a childhood with deafness. Urbana-Champagne: University of Illinois Press.
11. Frank, G. 2000. Venus on wheels: Two decades of dialogue on disability, biography, and being female in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Gervais, K. G., D. E. Vawter, and E. Spilseth. 1995. Readings in rehabilitation ethics. HEC Forum 7(2): 183-197.
13. Haas, J. 1993. Ethical considerations of goal setting for patient care in rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2(4): 228-232.
14. Institute of Medicine. 1997. Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington: National Academy Press.
15. Jonsen, A. R. 1997. The birth of bioethics: The origins and evolution of a demi-discipline. Medical Humanities Review 11(1): 9-21.
16. Kuczewski, M. G. 1997. Fragmentation and consensus: Communitarian and casuist bioethics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
17. Kuczewski, M. G., and I. Fiedler. n.d. Ethical issues in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: The redevelopment of autonomy and community integration. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, forthcoming.
18. Kuczewski, M. G., and R. L. Pinkus. 1999. An ethics casebook for hospitals: Practical approaches to everyday cases. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
19. Mailhot, A. 1994. Mouth. Not-Dead-Yet Web site. Available from: http://www.notdeadyet.org/bioethic.html.
20. Mason, T. 1992. Sullivan made the right choice in rejecting the Oregon plan. Health Matrix 2(1): 85-88.
21. Meisel, A. 1992. The legal consensus about forgoing life- sustaining treatment: Its status and prospects. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2(4): 309-345.
22. Menzel, P T. 1992. Oregon's denial: Disabilities and quality of life. Hastings Center Report 22(6): 21-25.
23. Nelson, R. M., and T. Drought. 1992. Justice and the moral acceptability of rationing medical care: The Oregon experiment. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 17(1): 97-117.
24. Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: St. Martin's Press.
25. Purtilo, R. B. 1984. Applying the principles of informed consent to patient care: Legal and ethical considerations for physical therapy. Physical Therapy 64:934-937.
26. Purtilo, R. B. 1988. Ethical issues in teamwork: The context of rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69(5): 318-322.
27. Robillard, A. B. 1999. Meaning of a disability: The lived experience of paralysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
28. World Health Organization. 1980. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.