Use of age and milk production data to improve the ability of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test results to predict Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis fecal culture status

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-242

  Berghaus, Roy D ^a   Farver, Thomas B ^a   Anderson, Randall J ^b   Adaska, John M ^c   Gardner, Ian A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dairy cattle; Fecal culture; Johne's disease; Mycobacterium paratuberculosis

Indexed keywords

MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM;

EID: 33745044736     PISSN: 10406387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104063870601800301     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abbas B, Riemann HP, Hird DW: 1983, Diagnosis of Johne's disease (paratuberculosis) in northern California and a note on its economic significance. Calif Vet 8:20-24.
2. Adaska JM, Muñoz-Zanzi CA, Hietala SK: 2002, Evaluation of result variability with a commercial Johne's disease enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and repeat testing of samples. J Vet Diagn Invest 14:423-426.
3. Bech-Nielsen S, Jorgensen JB, Ahrens P, Feld NC: 1992, Diagnostic accuracy of a Mycobacterium phlei-absorbed serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis in dairy cows. J Clin Microbiol 30:613-618.
4. Buergelt CD, Duncan JR: 1978, Age and milk production data of cattle culled from a dairy herd with paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 173:478-480.
5. Collins MT: 2002, Interpretation of a commercial bovine paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood ratios. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:1367-1371.
6. Collins MT, Sockett DC: 1993, Accuracy and economics of the USDA-licensed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for bovine paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 203:1456-1463.
7. Collins MT, Wells SJ, Petrini KR, et al.: 2005, Evaluation of five antibody detection tests for bovine paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:685-692.
8. Dargatz DA, Byrum BA, Collins MT, et al.: 2004, A multilaboratory evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for the detection of antibodies against Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 16:509-514.
9. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: 1988, Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837-845.
10. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD: 2000, Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 45:23-41.
11. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: 2000, Applied logistic regression, 2nd ed., pp. xii, 373. Wiley, New York, NY.
12. Johnson YJ, Kaneene JB, Gardiner JC, et al.: 2001, The effect of subclinical Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection on milk production in Michigan dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 84:2188-2194..
13. Johnson-Ifearulundu YJ, Kaneene JB, Sprecher DJ, et al.: 2000, The effect of subclinical Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection on days open in Michigan. USA. dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 46:171-181..
14. Kim SG, Kim EH, Lafferty CJ, et al.: 2004, Use of conventional and real-time polymerase chain reaction for confirmation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in a broth-based culture system ESP II. J Vet Diagn Invest 16:448-453.
15. Manning EJ, Collins MT: 2001, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Rev Sci Tech 20:133-150.
16. National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on Diagnosis and Control of Johne's Disease, Diagnostics: testing of domestic animals. In: Diagnosis and control of Johne's Disease, pp. 45-65. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
17. Nielsen SS, Enevoldsen C, Gröhn YT: 2002, The Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis ELISA response by parity and stage of lactation. Prev Vet Med 54:1-10.
18. Nordlund KV, Goodger WJ, Pelletier J, et al.: 1996, Associations between subclinical paratuberculosis and milk production, milk components, and somatic cell counts in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 208:1872-1876.
19. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB: 1993, Likelihood ratios for continuous test results-making the clinicians' job easier or harder? J Clin Epidemiol 46:85-93.
20. Sockett DC, Carr DJ, Collins MT: 1992, Evaluation of conventional and radiometric fecal culture and a commercial DNA probe for diagnosis of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infections in cattle. Can J Vet Res 56:148-153.
21. Strickland SJ, Scott HM, Libal MC, et al.: 2005, Effects of seasonal climatic conditions on the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 88:2432-2440.
22. Sweeney RW, Whitlock RH, Hamir AN, et al.: 1992, Isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after oral inoculation in uninfected cattle. Am J Vet Res 53:1312-1314.
23. Tavornpanich S, Gardner IA, Anderson RJ, et al.: 2004. Evaluation of microbial culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in large dairy herds. Am J Vet Res 65:1061-1070.
24. van Schaik G, Stchman SM, Schukken YH, et al.: 2003. Longitudinal study to investigate variation in results of repeated ELISA and culture of fecal samples for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in commercial dairy herds. Am J Vet Res 64:479-484.
25. Whitlock RH, Wells SJ, Sweeney RW, Van Tiem J: 2000, ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): sensitivity and specificity of each method. Vet Microbiol 77:387-398.
26. Yokomizo Y, Yugi H, Merkal RS: 1985, A method for avoiding false-positive reactions in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Jpn J Vet Sci 47:111-119.