Evaluation of result variability with a commercial Johne's disease enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and repeat testing of samples

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 423-426

  Adaska, John M ^a   Muñoz Zanzi, Claudia A ^b   Hietala, Sharon K ^c  

^a California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory Tulare Branch   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Davis Facility   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM ANTIBODY;

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; IMMUNOLOGY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0042271631     PISSN: 10406387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104063870201400513     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Abbas B, Riemann HP, Hird DW: 1983, Diagnosis of Johne's disease (paratuberculosis) in northern California cattle and a note on its economic significance. Calif Vet 8:20-24.
2. Benedictus G, Dijkhuizen AA, Stelwagen J: 1987, Economic losses due to paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 121:142-146.
3. Collins MT: 1996. Diagnosis of paratuberculosis. In: Veterinary Clinics of North America, ed. Sweeney RW, vol. 12. Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease), pp. 357-371. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Collins MT, Sockett DC: 1993, Accuracy and economics of the USDA-licensed enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay for bovine paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 203:1456-1463.
5. Jacabson RH: 1998, Validation of serological assays for diagnosis of infectious disease. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epizoot 17: 469-526.
6. Johnson-Ifearulundu YJ, Kaneene JB: 1997, Epidemiology and economic impact of subclinical Johne's disease: a review. Vet Bull 67:437-447.
7. Milner AR, Mack WN, Coates KJ, et al.: 1990, The sensitivity and specificity of a modified ELISA for the diagnosis of Johne's disease from a field trial in cattle. Vet Microbiol 25:193-198.
8. Stabel JR: 1998. Johne's disease: a hidden threat. J Dairy Sci 81:283-288.
9. Whitlock RH, Buergelt C: 1996, Preclinical and clinical manifestations of paratuberculosis (including pathology). In: Veterinary Clinics of North America, ed. Sweeney RW, vol. 12. Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease), pp. 345-356. WB Saunders. Philadelphia, PA.
10. Wilson DJ, Rossiter C, Han HR, et al.: 1993. Association of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection with reduced mastitis, but with decreased milk production and increased cull rate in clinically normal dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 54:1851-1857.