Evaluation of microbial culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in large dairy herds

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 65, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1061-1070

  Tavornpanich, Saraya ^a   Gardner, Ian A ^a   Anderson, Randall J ^b   Shin, Sang ^c   Whitlock, Robert H ^d   Fyock, Terry ^d   Adaska, John M ^e   Walker, Richard L ^a   Hietala, Sharon K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Animal Health Branch   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGAR MEDIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BAYES THEOREM; CALCULATION; CATTLE DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CULTURE MEDIUM; DAIRY CATTLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EGG YOLK; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EVALUATION; FECES ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID CULTURE; MYCOBACTERIOSIS; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM; NONHUMAN; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SERODIAGNOSIS; SEROPREVALENCE;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CALIFORNIA; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; CULTURE MEDIA; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FECES; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS TAURUS; MYCOBACTERIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM;

EID: 4344665229     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1061     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Whitlock RH, Wells SJ, Sweeney RW, et al. ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): sensitivity and specificity of each method. Vet Microbiol 2000;77:387-398.
2. Sweeney RW, Whitlock RH, Buckley CL, et al. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 1995;7:488-493.
3. Christensen J, Gardner IA. Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000;45:83-106.
4. Cowling DW, Gardner IA, Johnson WO. Comparison of methods for estimation of individual-level prevalence based on pooled samples. Prev Vet Med 1999;39:211-225.
5. Munoz-Zanzi CA, Johnson WO, Thurmond MC, et al. Pooled-sample testing as a herd-screening tool for detection of bovine diarrhea virus persistently infected cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000; 12:195-203.
6. van Schaik G, Stehman SM, Schukken YH, et al. Pooled fecal culture sampling for Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis at different herd sizes and prevalence. J Vet Diagn Invest 2003; 15:233-241.
7. Kalis CHJ, Hesselink JW, Barkema HW, et al. Culture of strategically pooled bovine fecal samples as a method to screen herds for paratuberculosis. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000;12:547-551.
8. Wells SJ, Godden SM, Lindeman CJ, et al. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of individual and pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:1022-1025.
9. Wells SJ, Whitlock RH, Lindeman CJ, et al. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1207-1211.
10. Sorensen O, Rawluk S, Wu J, et al. Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in dairy herds in Alberta. Can Vet J 2003;44:221-226.
11. Carlin BP, Louis TA. Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2000; 121-191.
12. Tortoli E, Cichero P, Chirillo MG, et al. Multicenter comparison of ESP Culture System II with BACTEC 460TB and with Lowenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of Mycobacteria from different clinical specimens, including blood. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:1378-1381.
13. Shin SJ. A new liquid-culture method, the TREK ESP Culture System II, for rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine fecal samples. Proc Annu Meet US Anim Health Assoc 2000;104:392-393.
14. Stabel JR. An improved method for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples and comparison to three other methods. J Vet Diagn Invest 1997;9:375-380.
15. van der Giessen JW, Haring RM, Vauclare E, et al. Evaluation of the abilities of three diagnostic tests based on the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in cattle: application in a control program. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30:1216-1219.
16. Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:263-272.
17. Gardner IA, Stryhn H, Lind P, et al. Conditional dependence between test affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000;45:107-122.
18. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM. Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 1990;8:398-409.
19. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Gilks WR, et al. Hepatitis B: a case study in MCMC methods. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, eds. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Boca Raton, Fla: Chapman & Hall, 1998;21-43.
20. Stabel JR, Whitlock RH. An evaluation of a modified interferon-γ assay for the detection of paratuberculosis in dairy herds. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2001;79:69-81.
21. Bulaga L. US voluntary Johne's disease herd status program for cattle. Proc Annu Meet US Anim Health Assoc 1998;102:420-433.
22. Wells SJ, Whitlock RH, Wagner BA, et al. Sensitivity of test strategies used in the Voluntary Johne's Disease Herd Status Porogram for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in dairy cattle herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:1053-1057.