Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 119-152

  Sloan, Kris ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744914100     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Apple, M. (1988). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York and London: Routledge.
2. Apple, M.. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in conservative age (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. E. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Baratta-Lorton, M. (1982/2002). Math their way. Saratoga, CA: Center for Innovation in Education.
6. Bruer, J. T. (1999). In search of brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 649-657.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. New York: Addison-Wesley.
9. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-331.
10. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. London: Falmer Press.
11. Cary, D. A., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (1995). Equity and mathematics education. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 93-125). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Chipman, S. F. (1986). Integrating three perspectives on learning. In S. L. Friedman, K. A. Klivington, & R. W. Peterson (Eds.), The brain, cognition, and education (pp. 203-232). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13. Cimbricz, S. (2002, January 9). State-mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practice. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved September 1, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18
14. Clandinin, D. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teachers images in action. Barcombe Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
15. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J.. (1999). Storied identities: Storied landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policy makers need to know and be able to do. Philadelphia: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
20. Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(4), 524-540.
21. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318-375). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
23. Flores, B. B., & Clark, E. R. (2003). Texas voices speak out about high-stakes testing: Pre-service teachers, teachers, and students. Current Issues in Education, 6(3). Retrieved August 15, 2004, from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number3/
24. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1993). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
25. Gallagher, C. (2000). A seat at the table: Teachers reclaiming assessment through rethinking accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 502-507.
26. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
27. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.
28. Giddens, A.. (1994). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Gillman, D. A., & Reynolds, L. L. (1991). The side effects of statewide testing. Contemporary Education, 62(4), 273-278.
30. Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
31. Grant, S. G. (2000). Teachers and tests: Exploring teachers' perceptions of changes in the New York state testing program. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(14), 1-16.
32. Grant, S. G. (2001). An uncertain lever: Exploring the influence of state-level testing in New York state on teaching social studies. Teachers College Record, 103(3), 398-426.
33. Grissmer, D., & Flanagan, A. (1998). Exploring rapid achievement gains in North Carolina and Texas. Washington, DC: National Educational Goals Panel.
34. Guerrero, M. G., & Sloan, K. (2001). A descriptive analysis of four exemplary K-3 Spanish reading programs in Texas: Are they really exemplary? Bilingual Research Journal, 25 (1 & 2), 253-280.
35. Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of communicative action, Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Madrid: Taurus.
36. Hayes, K. J., & Taylor, L. L. (1996). Neighborhood school characteristics: What signals quality to homebuyers? Economic and Financial Review, fourth quarter, 2-9.
37. Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
38. Hoffman, J. V., Assaf, L., Pennington, J., & Paris, S. G. (2001). High stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54(5), 482-492.
39. Holland, D. C., & Eisenhart, M. A. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Jones, G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., Yarbough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 199-203.
42. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
43. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. McLaren, P. (1989/1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.
45. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
46. McNeil, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2000). Harmful effects of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In M. Kornhaber, G. Orfield, & M. Kurlandar (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequity and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 89-123). New York: Century Foundation.
47. Meyer, R. J. (2002). Phonics exposed: Understanding and resisting systematic direct intense phonics instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
49. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
50. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. O'Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293-329.
52. Reyes, P., Scribner, J. D., & Paredes-Scribner, A. (1999). Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
53. Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
54. Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learner, K-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
55. Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
56. Scheurich, J. J., Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 293-299.
57. Schwab, J. J. (1964). Structure of disciplines: Meaning and significances. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6-30). Chicago: Rand McNally.
58. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). Leadership for the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Simon, R., & Dippo, D. (1986). On critical ethnographic work. Anthropology of Education Quarterly, 17(4), 195-202.
60. Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 235-259.
61. Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Equity-driven, achievement-focused school districts. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center.
62. Sloan, K. (2004). Between the "inputs" and "outputs": Assessing the effects of high stakes accountability on educational quality. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How "Texas-style" accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 136-160). New York: State University of New York Press.
63. Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-11.
64. Suárez, T. M., & Gottovi, N. C. (1992). The impact of high-stakes assessments on our schools. NASSP Bulletin, 76(545), 82-88.
65. Texas Education Agency. (2001). An overview of the Academic Excellence Indicator System for the State of Texas. Retrieved July 21, 2003, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2001/index.html
66. Trueba, E. (1999). Latinos unidos: From cultural diversity to the politics of solidarity. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
67. Valencia, R., Valenzuela, A., Sloan, K., & Foley, D. (2001). Let's treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(4), 318-321, 326.
68. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York: State University of New York Press.
69. Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2004). Leaving children behind: How "Texas-style" accountability fails Latino youth. New York: State University of New York Press.
70. Wideen, M. F., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 428-444.
71. Wright, E. L., & Govindarajan, G. (1995). Discrepant event demonstrations. Science Teacher, 62(1), 24-28.
72. Zancanella, D. (1992). The influence of state-mandated testing on teachers of literature. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 283-295.