An evaluation of a brief motivational intervention among young ecstasy and cocaine users: No effect on substance and alcohol use outcomes

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1014-1026

  Marsden, John ^a   Stillwell, Garry ^a   Barlow, Helen ^a   Boys, Annabel ^a   Taylor, Colin ^a   Hunt, Neil ^b   Farrell, Michael ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brief intervention; Cocaine; Controlled trial; Crack; Ecstasy; Motivational interviewing

Indexed keywords

3,4 METHYLENEDIOXYMETHYLAMPHETAMINE; AMPHETAMINE; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT; COCAINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABSTINENCE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF EVALUATION; SELF REPORT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HALLUCINOGENS; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MOTIVATION; N-METHYL-3,4-METHYLENEDIOXYAMPHETAMINE; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 33744904975     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01290.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). World drug report, vol. 1 : Analysis. Vienna : UNODC 2005.
2. Chivite-Mathews N. Richardson A. O'Shea J. Becker J. Owen N. Roe S. et al. Drug misuse declared: findings from the 2003/04 British Crime Survey. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. London : Home Office 2005.
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: national findings. Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-28, DHHS publication no. SMA 05-4062. Rockville, MD : SAMHSA 2005.
4. Miller N. S. Gold M. S. Millman R. B. Cocaine: general characteristics, abuse and addiction. NY State J Med 1989 89 : 390 4.
5. Green A. R. Mechan A. O. Elliott J. M. O'Shea E. Colado M. I. Thepharmacology and clinical pharmacology of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy'). Pharmacol Rev 2003 55 : 463 508.
6. Anthony J. C. Petronis K. R. Early-onset drug use and risk of later drug problems. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995 40 : 9 15.
7. Lader D. Meltzer H. Drinking: adults' behaviour and knowledge in 2001. Office for National Statistics and Social Surveys. London : Stationery Office 2002.
8. Marsden J. Boys A. Farell M. Stillwell G. Hutchings K. Hillebrand J. et al. Personal and social correlates of alcohol consumption among mid-adolescents. Br J Dev Psychol 2005 23 : 1 26.
9. Magura S. Rosenblum A. Modulating effect of alcohol use on cocaine use. Addict Behav 2000 25 : 117 22.
10. Boys A. Dobson J. Marsden J. Strang. J. Rich man's speed: a qualitative study of young cocaine users. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2002 9 : 195 210.
11. Pennings J. M. Leccese A. P. de Wolff F. A. Effects of concurrent use of alcohol and cocaine. Addiction 2002 97 : 773 83.
12. Home Office Drugs Strategy Directorate. Updated drugs strategy. London : Home Office 2002.
13. Baer J. S. Peterson P. L. Motivational interviewing with adolescents and young adults. In : Miller W. R. Rollnick S., eds. Motivational interviewing - preparing people for change, 2nd edn. New York : Guilford Press 2002, p. 320 32.
14. Shiner M. Newburn T. Young people, drugs and peer education. An evaluation of the youth awareness programme (YAP). Drugs Prevention Initiative. Paper 13. London : Drugs Prevention Unit, Home Office, 1996.
15. Miller W. R. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Psychother 1993 11 : 147 72.
16. Burke et al. Efficacy of motivational interviewing and its adaptations. In : Miller W. R. Rollnick S., eds. Motivational interviewing - preparing people for change, 2nd edn. New York : Guilford Press 2002, p. 217 50.
17. Baker A. Boggs T. G. Lewin T. J. Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive-behavioural interventions among regular users of amphetamine. Addiction 2001 96 : 1279 87.
18. Baer J. S. Kivlahan D. R. Blume A. W. McKnight P. Marlatt G. A. Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. Am J Public Health 2001 91 : 1310 16.
19. McCambridge J. Strang J. The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction 2004 99 : 39 52.
20. Bernstein J. Bernstein E. Tassiopoulos K. Heeren T. Levenson S. Hingson R. Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005 77 : 49 59.
21. Dunn C. DeRoo L. Rivara F. P. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioural domains: a systematic review. Addiction 2001 96 : 1725 42.
22. Burke B. L. Arkowitz H. Menchola M. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003 71 : 843 61.
23. Rollnick S. Bell A. Brief motivational interviewing for the nonspecialist. In : Miller W. R. Rollnick S., eds. Motivational interviewing - preparing people for change. New York : Guildford Press 1991, p. 203 13.
24. Rollnick S. Heather N. Bell A. Negotiating behavioural change in medical settings: the development of brief motivational interviewing. J Mental Health 1992 1 : 25 37.
25. National Treatment Agency. Models of care for treatment of drug misusers. Part two : Full reference report. London : National Treatment Agency 2002. Available at: http://www.nta.nhs.uk/publications/MOCPART2/mocpart2_feb03-old. pdf. Accessed 17 March 2006.
26. Dunn C. DeRoo L. Rivara F. P. The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioural domains: a systematic review. Addiction 2001 96 : 1725 42.
27. Heckathorn D. D. Respondent driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 1997 44 : 174 99.
28. Boys A. Marsden J. Strang. J. Understanding reasons for drug use amongst young people: a functional perspective. Health Educ Res 2001 16 : 457 69.
29. Marsden J. Gossop M. Stewart D. et al. The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome. Addiction 1998 93 : 1857 68.
30. Gossop M. Griffiths P. Powis B. Strang J. Severity of dependence and route of administration of heroin, cocaine and amphetamines. Br J Addict 1992 87 : 1527 36.
31. Topp L. Mattick R. P. Choosing a cut-off on the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for amphetamine users. Addiction 1997 92 : 839 45.
32. Kaye S. Darke S. Determining a diagnostic cut-off on the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for cocaine dependence. Addiction 2002 97 : 727 31.
33. Conigrave K. M. Saunders J. B. Reznik R. B. Predictive capacity of the AUDIT questionnaire for alcohol-related harm. Addiction 1995 90 : 1479 85.
34. Sobell L. C. Sobell M. B. Can we do without alcohol abusers' self-reports. Behav Ther 1986 7 : 141 6.
35. Niedbala R. S. Kardos K. Fries T. Cannon A. Davis A. Immunoassay for detection of cocaine/metabolites in oral fluids. J Anal Toxicol 2001 25 : 62 8.
36. Hedges L. V. Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA : Academic Press 1985.
37. Borenstein M. Hypothesis testing and effect-size estimation in clinical trials. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997 78 : 5 16.
38. Assmann S. F. Pocock S. J. Enos L. E. Kasten L. E. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000 335 : 1064 9.
39. Clifford P. R. Maisto S. A. Franzke L. H. Longabaugh R. Beattie M. C. Alcohol treatment research follow-up interviews. J Stud Alcohol 2000 61 : 736 43.
40. Miller W. R. Yahne C. E. Tonigan J. S. Motivational interviewing in drug abuse services: a randomized trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003 71 : 754 63.
41. Donovan D. M. Rosengren D. B. Downey L. Cox G. C. Sloan K. L. Attrition prevention with individuals awaiting publicly funded drug treatment. Addiction 2001 96 : 1149 60.
42. Clifford P. R. Maisto S. A. J. Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol 2000 61 : 787 93.