Mathematics intervention for grades 5-11: Teaching mathematics, reading, or both?

Reading Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 2-3, 2006, Pages 127-146

  Carter, Tamara Anhtony ^a   Dean, Emily Ocker ^b  

^a Oklahoma City Community College   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744898775     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ni0206-127     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56, 786-795.
2. Aiken, L. R. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42, 359-385.
3. Allington, R. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
4. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research(pp. 255-292). New York: Longman.
5. Barton, M. L., & Heidema, C. (2000). Teaching reading in mathematics: A supplement to teaching reading in the content areas teacher's manual. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 469 111)
6. Barton, M. L., Heidema, C., & Jordan, D. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics and science. Educational Leadership, 60, 24-28.
7. Bintz, W. P., & Moore, S. D. (2002). Using literature to support mathematical thinking in middle school. Middle School Journal, 34, 25-32.
8. Borasi, R., Siegel, M., Fonzi, J., & Smith, C. F. (1998). Using transactional reading strategies to support sense-making and discussion in mathematics classrooms: An exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 275-305.
9. Center for the Education and Study of Diverse Populations, (n.d.). Connections in reading and mathematics instruction. Available at www.cesdp.nmhu.edu/pubs/connections.pdf (Retrieved May 10, 2005).
10. Draper, R. J. (2002). School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-oriented math classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 520-529.
11. Durkin, K. (1991). Primary school children's interpretations of lexical ambiguity in mathematical descriptions. The Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 46-55.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563-573.
13. Cough, P. B. (1996). How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 3-20.
14. Gunning, T. G. (2004). Creating literacy instruction for all students in grades 4 through 8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Helwig, R., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., Tindal, G., Heath, B., & Almond, P.J. (1999). Reading as an access to mathematics problem solving on multiple choice tests for sixth grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 113-126.
16. Hoover, W. A., & Cough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
17. Jordan, N. C., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003).Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 103-119.
18. Kamil, M. L. (2004). Vocabulary and comprehension instruction: Summary and implications of the National Reading Panel findings. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 213-234). Baltimore, Paul H. Brookes.
19. Lerner, J. (1993). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and learning strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Lewis, C., Hitch, G. J., & Walker, P. (1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology, 35, 283-292.
21. Mather, J. R. C., & Chiodo, J.J. (1994). A mathematical problem: How do we teach mathematics to LEP elementary students? The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 1-12.
22. McKenzie, W. (1990). Meaning: The common element in both reading and mathematics. Ontario Mathematics Gazette, 28(5), 8-13.
23. National Council of Teachers of English, (n.d). Learning through language: A call for action in all disciplines. Available at http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/curr/107630.htm (Retrieved October 1, 2005).
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Pearson, P. (1996). Reclaiming the center. In M. Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first A: Every child's right to read (pp. 259-274). New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
28. Reehm, S. P., & Long, S. A. (1996). Reading in the mathematics classroom. Middle School Journal, 27, 35-41.
29. Schell, V.J. (1982). Learning partners: Reading and mathematics. The Reading Teacher, 35, 544-548.
30. Secada, W. (1991). Student diversity and mathematics education reform. In L. Idol &: B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform, (pp. 297-332). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33. Vacca, R. T., &: Vacca, J. A. (2002). Content-area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.