Organizational change in stakeholder business systems: The role of institutions

Journal of Organizational Change Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 383-392

  Cheng, Philip ^a   Millar, Carla C J M ^b   Choi, Chong Ju ^c  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Corporate identity; Measurement; Organizational change; Stakeholder analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744778467     PISSN: 09534814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09534810610668373     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bonacich, P. (1987), "Power and centrality: a family of measures", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92 No. 4, pp. 1170-83.
2. Choi, C.J., Dassiou, X. and Gettings, S. (2000), "Herding behaviour and the size of customer base as a commitment to quality", Economica, Vol. 67 No. 1, pp. 375-98.
3. Choi, C.J., Lee, S.H. and Oh, D. (1995), "The strategy of grouping and reputation linkage in clubs and multi-product firms", European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 521-33.
4. Coleman, J. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Coveney, P. and Highfield, R. (1995), Frontiers of Complexity: The Search for Order in a Chaotic World, Ballantine Books, New York, NY.
6. Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Devlin, K. and Rosenberg, D. (1991), Logic and Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Feld, S. (1981), "The focused organization of social ties'", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 86 No. 1, pp. 1015-34.
9. Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman/Ballinger, Boston, MA.
10. Haunschild, P. (1994), "How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty and acquisition premiums", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 391-411.
11. Holland, J.H. (1995), Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
12. Jervis, R. (1985), The Logic of Images in International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
13. Jones, T. (1995), "Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 404-37.
14. Kelley, H. and Thibaut, J. (1978), Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, Wiley, New York, NY.
15. Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G. and Choi, C.J. (1999), "Increasing returns and social contagion in cultural industries", British Journal of Management, Vol. 10, pp. S61-S72.
16. Lane, D. and Maxfield, R. (1996), "Strategy under complexity: fostering generative relationships", Long Range Planning, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 215-31.
17. Macy, M. (1997), "Identity, interest and emergent rationality: an evolutionary synthesis", Rationality & Society, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 427-48.
18. Oberschall, A. and Kim, H. (1996), "Identity and action", Mobilization, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 63-86.
19. Orbell, J. and Dawes, R. (1991), "A 'Cognitive Miser' theory of cooperators' advantage", American Political Science Review, Vol. 85 No. 3, pp. 515-28.
20. Preston, L. (1994), "Stakeholder issues: four essays", working paper, College of Business and Management, Center for International Business Education and Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
21. Rowley, T. (1997), "Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 887-910.
22. Turner, J. (1982), "Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group", in Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relationships, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Wood, D. (1991), "Corporate social performance revisited", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 691-718.