An economic theory of the Fifth Amendment

RAND Journal of Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 833-848

  Mialon, Hugo M ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744767386     PISSN: 07416261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BAIRD, D.G., GERTNER, R.H., AND PICKER, R.C. Game Theory and the Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.
2. BENTHAM, J. A Treatise on Judicial Evidence. London: Quality Court, 1825.
3. BOYLAN, R.T. AND LONG, C.X. "Size, Monitoring, and Plea Rate: An Examination of United States Attorneys." Political Economy Working Paper no. 89, Washington University in St. Louis, 2000.
4. BRIGHT, S.B. "Death by Lottery-Procedural Bar of Constitutional Claims in Capital Cases Due to the Inadequate Representation of Indigent Defendants." West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92 (1990), pp. 679-692.
5. _. "Counsel for the Poor: The Death Sentence Not for the Worst Crime But for the Worst Lawyer." Yale Law Journal, Vol. 103 (1994), pp. 1835-1883.
6. BUCKE, T., SREET, R., AND BROWN, D. The Right to Silence: The Impact of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. A Research, Development and Statistics Directorate Report, Home Office Research Study 199. London: Home Office, 2000.
7. Carter v. Kentucky. 450 U.S. 288, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 77 (January 14, 1981).
8. "Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994: Elizabeth II. Chapter 33." London: The Stationery Office Books, 1994.
9. COOTER, R. AND RUBINFELD, D. "An Economic Model of Legal Discovery." Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23 (1994), pp. 435-463.
10. DONOHUE, J.J. III AND LEVITT, S.D. "The Impact of Race on Policing and Arrests." Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 44 (2001), pp. 367-394.
11. DUGGAN, J. AND MARTINELLI, C. "A Bayesian Model of Voting in Juries." Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 37 (2001), pp. 259-294.
12. FEDDERSEN, T. AND PESENDORFER, W. "Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts Under Strategic Voting." American Political Science Review, Vol. 92 (1998), pp. 23-35.
13. GAY, G.D., GRACE, M.F., KAUE, J.R., AND NOE, T.H. "Noisy Juries and the Choice of Trial Mode in a Sequential Signalling Game: Theory and Evidence." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 20 (1989), pp. 196-213.
14. GLAESER, E.L., KESSLER, D.P., AND PIEHL, A.M. "What Do Prosecutors Maximize? An Analysis of the Federalization of Drug Crimes." American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 2 (2000), pp. 259-290.
15. Griffin v. California. 380 U.S. 960, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1490 (April 5, 1965).
16. GUNTHER, G. AND SULLIVAN, K.M. Constitutional Law, 13th ed. New York: The Foundation Press, 1997.
17. JACKSON, J., WOLFE, M., AND QUINN, K. Legislating Against Silence: The Northern Ireland Experience. NIO Research and Statistical Series No. 1, 2000.
18. KING, N.J. "Postconviction Review of Jury Discrimination: Measuring the Effects of Juror Race on Jury Decisions." Michigan Law Review, Vol. 92 (1993), pp. 63-130.
19. LEVY, L. Origins of the Fifth Amendment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.
20. MILGROM, P.R. "Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications." Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12 (1981), pp. 380-391.
21. O.J. Simpson Trial Transcripts and Documents. WESTLAW, Notable Trials Library, 1995.
22. P'NG,I.P.L. "Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement, and Trial." Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 14 (1983), pp. 539-550.
23. REINGANUM, J.F. "Plea Bargaining and Prosecutorial Discretion." American Economic Review, Vol. 78 (1988), pp.713-728.
24. SEIDMANN, D.J. AND STEIN, A. "The Right to Silence Helps the Innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege." Harvard Law Review, Vol. 114 (2000), pp. 431-510.
25. SHIN, H.S. "Adversarial and Inquisitorial Procedures in Arbitration." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 29 (1998), pp. 378-405.
26. SPIER, K.E. "The Dynamics of Pretrial Negotiation." Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59 (1992), pp. 93-108.
27. VICK, D.W. "Poorhouse Justice: Underfunded Indigent Defense Services and Arbitrary Death Sentences." Buffalo Law Review, Vol. 43 (1995), pp. 329-460.