Hydrodynamic evaluation of kangaroo aortic valve matrices for tissue valve engineering

Artificial Organs

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 432-439

  Narine, Kishan K ^a   Kramm, Katarzyna ^b   Dumont, Kris ^b   Jalali, Homayoun ^c   Sparks, Lisa ^c   Segers, Patrick ^b   Verdonck, Pascal ^b   Van Nooten, Guido J ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Hydrodynamics of heart valve matrices; Kangaroo aortic valve matrices; Porcine aortic valve matrices; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; HEART; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE;

AORTIC VALVES; HEART VALVES; HYDRODYNAMIC OF HEART VALVE MATRIX; KANGAROO AORTIC VALVE MATRIX; MATRIX; PORCINE AORTIC VALVE MATRIX; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

HYDRODYNAMICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HEART; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PERFORMANCE; HEART RATE; HEART VALVE; HYDRODYNAMICS; KANGAROO; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PARAMETERS OF MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SUIDAE;

EID: 33744755029     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00238.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Emery RW Van Nooten GJ Tesar PJ. The initial experience with the ATS medical mechanical valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 75 : 444 52.
2. Yoganathan AP Corcoran WH Harrison EC Carl JR. The Bjork Shiley aortic valve prosthesis: flow characteristics, thrombus formation and tissue overgrowth. Circulation 1978 58 : 70 6.
3. Anderson JM Schoen FJ. Interactions of blood with artificial surfaces. In : Butchart EG Bodnar E, eds. Thrombosis, Embolism and Bleeding. London : London ICR Publishers, 1992 60 68.
4. Litin SC Gastineau DA. Current concepts in anticoagulant therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 1995 70 : 266 72.
5. Ferrans VJ Spray TL Billingham ME Roberts WC. Structural changes in glutaraldehyde treated porcine heterografts used as substitute heart valves: transmission and scanning electron microscopic observations in 17 patients. Am J Cardiol 1978 41 : 1159 84.
6. Hammermeister K Sethi GK Henderson WG. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs Randomised Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 36 : 1152 8.
7. Shinoka T Ma PX Shum-Tim D, et al. Tissue-engineered heart valves. Autologous valve leaflet replacement study in a lamb model. Circulation 1996 94 9 Suppl. III64 8.
8. Zund G Breuer CK Shinoka T, et al. The in vitro construction of a tissue engineered bioprosthetic heart valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997 11 : 493 7.
9. Hoerstrup SP Sodian R Daebritz S, et al. Functional living trileaflet heart valves grown in vitro. Circulation 2000 102 Suppl. III III 44-9.
10. Rothenburger M Volker W Vischer JP, et al. Tissue engineering of heart valves: formation of a three-dimensional tissue using porcine heart valve cells. ASAIO J 2002 48 : 586 91.
11. Bertipaglia B Ortolani F Petrelli L, et al. Vitalitate exornatum succedaneum aorticum labore ingenioso obtenibitur project. Cell characterization of porcine aortic valve and decellularized leaflets repopulated with aortic valve interstitial cells. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 75 : 1274 82.
12. Narine K Chery CC Goethgebeur E, et al. Kangaroo vs porcine aortic valves: calcification potential after glutaraldehyde fixation. Eur Surg Res 2005 37 : 137 43.
13. Neethling WM Papadimitriou JM Swarts E Hodge AJ. Kangaroo versus porcine aortic valve tissue-valve geometry morphology, tensile strength and calcification potential. J Cardiovasc Surg 2000 41 : 341 8.
14. Weinhold C Adt M Weingartner J, et al. In vivo investigation of kangaroo aortic valve xenobioprostesis: an experimental animal model. In : Bodnar E Yacoub M, eds. Biological and Bioprosthetic Valves. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium. New York : Yorke Medical Books, 1986 669 76.
15. Narine K DeWever O Cathenis K Mareel M Van Belleghem Y Van Nooten G. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced transition of fibroblasts: a model for myofibroblast procurement in tissue valve engineering. J Heart Valve Dis 2004 13 : 281 9.
16. Lijnen P Petro V Rumilla K Fagard R. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes contraction of collagen gel by cardiac fibroblasts through their differentiation into myofibroblasts. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2005 25 : 79 86.
17. David TE Feindel CM Scully HE Bos J Rakowski H. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves. a ten-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1998 7 : 250 4.
18. Sacks MS Schoen FJ. Collagen fiber disruption occurs independent of calcification in clinically explanted bioprothetic heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res 2002 62 : 359 71.
19. Booth C Korossis SA Wilcox HE, et al. Tissue engineering of cardiac valve protheses I. development and histological characterization of an acellular porcine scaffold. J Heart Valve Dis 2002 11 : 457 62.
20. Vesely I. Heart valve tissue engineering. Circ Res 2005 97 : 743 55.
21. Wilson GJ Courtman DW Klement Peter Lee JM Yeger H. Acellular matrix: a biomaterials approach for coronary artery bypass and heart valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1995 60 : S353 8.
22. Zeltinger J Landeen LK Alexander HG Kidd IG Sibanda B. Development and characterisation of tissue-engineered aortic valves. Tissue Eng 2001 7 : 9 22.
23. Verdonck P Kleven A Verhoeven R Angelsen B Vandenbogaerde J. Computer-controlled in vitro model of the human left heart. Med Biol Eng Comput 1992 30 : 656 9.
24. Verdonck PR Van Nooten GJ Van Belleghem Y. Pulse duplicator hydrodynamics of four different bileaflet valves in the mitral position. Cardiovasc Surg 1997 5 : 593 603.
25. Verdonck PR Dumont K Segers P Vandenberghe S Van Nooten G. Mock loop testing of On-x prosthetic mitral valve with Doppler echocardiography. Artif Organs 2002 26 : 872 8.
26. Dumont K Segers R Vandenberghe S Van Nooten G Verdonck P. Omnicarbon 21 mm aortic valve prosthesis: in vitro hydrodynamic and echo-Doppler study. Int J Artif Organs 2002 25 : 783 90.
27. Vandenberghe S Van Loon JP Segers P Rakhorst G Verdonck P. In vitro evaluation of the PUCA II intra-arterial LVAD. Int J Artif Organs 2003 26 : 743 52.
28. Vandenberghe S Segers P Josemans H Van Loon JP Rakhorst G Verdonck P. In vitro assessment of the unloading and perfusion capacities of the PUCA II and the IABP. Perfusion 2004 19 : 25 32.
29. Chandran KB Khalighi B. A note on the blood analog for in-vitro testing of heart valve bioprostheses. J Biomed Eng 1984 106 : 112 4.
30. Yoganathan AP Chaux A Gray R, et al. Bileaflet tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984 3 : 313 20.
31. Gabbayy S McQueen DW Yellin EL Becker RM Fraster RWM. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978 76 : 771 86.
32. Yoganathan AP He Z Jones C. Fluid mechanics of heart valves. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004 6 : 331 62.
33. Sarnoff S Braunwald E Welch GH Case RB Stainsby WN Macruz R. Hemodynamic determinants of oxygen consumption of the heart with special reference to the tension time index. Am J Physiol 1958 192 : 141 7.