Pulse duplicator hydrodynamics of four different bileaflet valves in the mitral position

Vascular

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 593-603

  Verdonck, P R ^a   Nooten, G J Van ^b   Belleghem, Y Van ^b  

^a Hydraulics Laboratory   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

artificial left heart system; bileaflet heart valves; echocardiography; haemodynamics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDRODYNAMICS; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; STEADY STATE;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 0031543374     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096721099700500609     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Arom K. V., Nicoloff D. M., Kersten T. E., Northrup W. F., Lindsay W. G., Emery R. W., Ten years experience with the St Jude medical valve prosthesis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1987, 47(6), 831–837.
2. Chambers J., Cross J., Deverall P., Sowton E., Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993, 21, 398–405.
3. Replacement heart valve guidance. Draft version, US Department of Health and Human Services: Food and Drug Administration, December 1993.
4. Verdonck R., Kleven A., Verhoeven R., Angelsen B., Vandenbogaerde J., Computer controlled in vitro model of the human left heart. Medical & Biological Engineering and Computing, 1992, 30, 656–659.
5. Pohl M., Wendt M., Werner S., Koch B., Lerche D., In vitro testing of artificial heart valves comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Artificial Organs, 1996, 20(1), 37–46.
6. Horstkotte D., Schulte H. D., Bircks W., Strauer B. E., The effect of chordal preservation on late outcome after mitral valve replacement: A randomized study. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1993, 2, 150–158.
7. Moon M. R., DeAnda A., Daughters G. T. H., Ingels N. B., Miller D. C., Experimental evaluation of different chordal preservation methods during mitral valve replacement. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994, 58, 931–944.
8. Okita Y., Miki S., Ueda Y., Tahata T., Sakai T., Matsuyama K., Comparative evaluation of left ventricular performance after mitral valve repair or mitral valve replacement with or without chordal preservation. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 1993, 2, 159–166.
9. Laub G. W., Muralidharan S., Pollock S., Adkins M. S., MacGrath L.B., The experimental relationship between leaflet clearance and orientation of the St. Jude Medical valve in the mitral position. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1992, 103, 638–641.
10. Reul H., Van Son L., Steinseffider U., et al, In vitro comparison of bildaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, 1993, 106, 412–420.
11. Wen H., Mölstad P., Simonsen S., et al, Hemodynamic evaluation of the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position: Comparison of non-invasive and invasive techniques. American Heart Journal, 1992, 123, 151–159.
12. Van Nooten G., Caes E., Francois K., Missault L., Van Belleghem Y., Clinical experience with the first 100 ATS heart valve implants. Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996, 4(3), 288–292.