Functional field score: The effect of using a Goldmann V-4e isopter instead of a Goldmann III-4e Isopter

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1817-1823

  Langelaan, Maaike ^a,b   Wouters, Bill ^c   Moll, Annette C ^a,b   De Boer, Michiel R ^a,b   Van Rens, Ger H M B ^a,b,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Het Loo Erf   (Netherlands)

^d ELKERLIEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE DISEASE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PERIMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PERIMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION, LOW; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUALLY IMPAIRED PERSONS;

EID: 33744737892     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1345     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bass SJ, Sherman J. Visual field testing in the low vision patient. In: Rosenthal BP, Cole RG, eds. Functional Assessment of Low Vision. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996:89-104.
2. Choplin NT, Sherwood MB, Spaeth GL. The effect of stimulus size on the measured threshold values in automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:371-374.
3. Szatmary G, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1162-1173.
4. Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:426-435.
5. Niederhauser S, Mojon DS. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in Goldmann kinetic perimetry. Ophthalmologica. 2002;216:406-408.
6. Wilensky JT, Mermelstein JR, Siegel HG. The use of different-sized stimuli in automated perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:710-713.
7. Hart WM Jr, Becker B. Visual field changes in ocular hypertension: a computer-based analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1176-1179.
8. Madreperla SA, Palmer RW, Massof RW, Finkelstein D. Visual acuity loss in retinitis pigmentosa: relationship to visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:358-361.
9. Kudrna GR, Stanley MA, Remington LA. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995;66:675-680.
10. Graf M. Visual field examination in limited patient cooperation [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;211:277-285.
11. Flammer J, Niesel P. Reproducibility of perimetric study results [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1984;184:374-376.
12. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1993.
13. Andersson GBJ, Cocchiarella L, eds. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2001.
14. Cocchiarella L, Andersson GBJ. The visual system. In: Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2001:277-304.
15. Langelaan M, Wouters B, Moll AC, Boer MR, Rens GH. Intra- and interrater agreement and reliability of the functional field score. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:136-142.
16. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
17. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, et al. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:774-781.
18. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
19. Visser M. Roaming through methodology. XXXIV. Limitations of predictive models [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;145:1109-1112.
20. Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med. 2000;19:453-473.
21. Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:826-832.