Intra- and interrater agreement and reliability of the Functional Field Score

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 136-142

  Langelaan, Maaike ^a,b   Wouters, Bill ^c   Moll, Annette C ^a,b   De Boer, Michiel R ^a,b   Van Rens, Ger H M B ^a,b,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Het Loo Erf   (Netherlands)

^d ELKERLIEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disability estimates; Functional field score; Functional Vision Score; Perimetry; Reliability; Visual field loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; BINOCULAR VISION; DISABILITY; FEMALE; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIMETRY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION DISORDERS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 21244480453     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00266.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E. and Stein, R. E. K. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual. Life Res. 11, 193-205.
2. American Medical Association (1993). Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 1st edn, 1971;
3. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 1st edn, 2nd edn, 1984;
4. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 1st edn, 3rd edn, 1988;
5. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 1st edn, 3rd edn rev., 1990;
6. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 1st edn, 4th edn, 1993 edn. American Medical Association, Chicago, IL.
7. Beck, R. W., Bergstrom, T. J. and Lichter, P. R. (1985). A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology. 92, 77-82.
8. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307-310.
9. Cocchiarella, L. and Andersson, G. (2001). The visual system. In: Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th edn. AMA Press, Washington, DC. pp. 277-304.
10. Colenbrander, A. (1994). The Functional Vision Score. In: Low Vision Research and New Developments in Rehabilitation, Vol. 11. (eds A. C. Kooijman, P. L. Looijestijn, J. A. Welling and G. J. van de Wildt), IOC Press, Amsterdam, pp. 552-561.
11. Colenbrander, A. (1999). Guide for the Evaluation of Visual Impairment. International Society for Low Vision Research and Rehabilitation, San Francisco, CA.
12. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159-174.
13. Norden, L. C. (1989). Reliability in perimetry. J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 60, 880-890.
14. Parrish, R. K., Schiffman, J. and Anderson, D. R. (1984). Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch. Ophthalmol. 102, 1497-1502.
15. Shrout, P. E. and Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86, 420-428.
16. Snell, A. and Sterling, S. (1925). The percentage evaluation of macular vision. Arch. Ophthalmol. 54, 443-461.
17. Szatmary, G., Biousse, V. and Newman, N. J. (2002). Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuroophthalmic practice? Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 1162-1173.
18. de Vet, H. C. W. (1998). Observer reliability and agreement. In: Encyclopedia Biostatistica, Vol. 4. (eds. P. Armitage and T. Colton), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Boston University, MA. pp. 3123-3128.
19. Wassle, H., Grunert, U., Rohrenbeck, J. and Boycott, B. B. (1990). Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vis. Res. 30, 1897-1911.