Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 125-139

  Goodman, Shawn S ^a   Keefe, Douglas H ^a  

^a BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic reflex; Cochlear mechanics; Efferent; Middle ear; Olivocochlear; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR OLIVE; MEDIAL OLIVOCOCHLEAR REFLEX; MIDDLE EAR; MIDDLE EAR MUSCLE REFLEX; MUSCLE REFLEX; NOISE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY; STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEA; EAR, MIDDLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REFLEX, ACOUSTIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33744483127     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0028-9     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. BERLIN CI, HOOD LJ, WEN H, SZABO P, CECOLA RP, RIGBY P, JACKSON DF. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 71:1-11, 1993.
2. BLOOD IM, GREENBERG HJ. Low-level acoustic reflex thresholds. Audiology 20:244-250, 1981.
3. BUKI B, WIT HP, AVAN P. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Brain Res. 852:140-150, 2000.
4. BURNS EM, HARRISON W, BULEN JC, KEEFE DH. Voluntary contraction of middle ear muscles: effects on input impedance, energy reflectance, and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 67:117-127, 1993.
5. COLLET L, KEMP DT, VEUILLET E, DUCLAUX R, MOULIN A, MORGON A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 43:251-262, 1990.
6. COOPER NP, GUINAN JJ. Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity. J. Physiol. 548(1):307-312, 2003.
7. DALLOS P. Dynamics of the acoustic reflex: phenomenological aspects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36:2175-2183, 1964.
8. DOLAN DF, GUO ME, NUTTALL AL. Frequency-dependent enhancement of basilar membrane velocity during olivocochlear bundle stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:3587-3596, 1997.
9. FEENEY MP, KEEFE DH, MARRYOTT LP. Contralateral acoustic reflex threshold for tonal activators using wideband reflectance and admittance. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 46:128-136, 2003.
10. FROEHLICH P, COLLET L, VALATX JL. Sleep and active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 66(1):1-7, 1993.
11. GELFAND SA. Essentials in Audiology, 1st ed. Thieme, New York, 1997.
12. GREEN DM, MCGILL WJ. On the equivalence of detection probabilities and well-known statistical quantities. Psychol. Rev. 77:294-301, 1970.
13. GUINAN JJ JR. Changes in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions produced by two-tone suppression and efferent stimulation in cat. In: Dallos P, Geisler C, Matthews J, Ruggero M, Steele C (eds) The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. Springer-Verlag, Madison, WI, pp 170-177, 1990.
14. GUINAN JJ JR. Physiology of olivocochlear efferents. In: Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) The Cochlea. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 435-502, 1996.
15. GUINAN JJ, GIFFORD ML. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. iii. Tuning curves and thresholds at cf. Hear. Res. 37:29-45, 1988.
16. GUINAN JJ, WARR WB, NORRIS BE. Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral vs. medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 221:358-370, 1983.
17. GUINAN JJ, BACKUS BC, LILAONITKUL W, AHARONSON V. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans. Otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:521-540, 2003.
18. HOOD LJ, BERLIN CI, HURLEY A, CECOLA RP, BELL B. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects. Hear. Res. 101:113-118, 1996.
19. HOOD LJ, BERLIN CI, BORDELON J, ROSE K. Patients with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony lack efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 14(6):302-313, 2003.
20. HUNG IJ, DALLOS P. Study of the acoustic reflex in human beings. I. Dynamic characteristics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52:1168-1180, 1973.
21. KAWASE T, HIDAKA H, TAKASAKA T. Frequency summation observed in the human acoustic reflex. Hear. Res. 108:37-45, 1997.
22. KEEFE DH. Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions: I, measurement theory and nonlinear coherence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:3489-3498, 1998.
23. KEEFE DH, LING R. Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions: II, intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear-canal measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:3499-3508, 1998.
24. KIM DO, DORN PA, NEELY ST, GORGA MP. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:31-40, 2001.
25. LIBERMAN MC. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear. Res. 39:47-56, 1989.
26. LIBERMAN MC, PURIA S, GUINAN, JR JJ. The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlear reflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:3572-3583, 1996.
27. LIBERMAN MC, ZUO J, GUINAN, JR JJ. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:1649-1655, 2004.
28. MAISON S, MICHEYL C, COLLET L. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1759-1768, 1997.
29. MAISON S, MICHEYL C, COLLET L. Contralateral frequency-modulated tones suppress transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear. Res. 117:114-118, 1998.
30. MAISON S, MICHEYL C, COLLET L. Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Neuroscience 91:133-138, 1999.
31. MAISON S, MICHEYL C, ANDEOL G, GALLEGO S, COLLET L. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth. Hear. Res. 140:111-125, 2000.
32. MARGOLIS R, POPELKA G. Loudness and the acoustical reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58:1330-1332, 1999.
33. MOLLER A. Acoustic reflex in man. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34:1524-1534, 1962.
34. MOLLER A. Auditory Physiology. Academic Press, New York, 1983.
35. MOTT JB, NORTON SJ, NEELY ST, WARR WB. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Hear. Res. 38:229-242, 1989.
36. MOUNTAIN DC. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 210:71-72, 1980.
37. MULLER-WEHLAU M, MAUERMANN M, DAU T, KOLLMEIER B. The effects of neural synchronization and peripheral compression on the acoustic-reflex threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117:3016-3027, 2005.
38. MURUGASU E, RUSSELL IJ. The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J. Neurosci. 16:325-332, 1996.
39. NEUMANN J, UPPENKAMP S, KOLLMEIER B. Detection of the acoustic reflex below 80 dB HL. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 1:359-369, 1996.
40. OPPENHEIM AV, SCHAFER RW. Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 1st ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1989.
41. RELKIN EM, STERNS A, PRIEVE BA, WOODS CI. Physiological mechanisms of onset adaptation and contralateral suppression of dpoaes in the rat. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6:119-135, 2005.
42. RICCI A. Active hair bundle movements and the cochlear amplifier. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 14:325-338, 2003.
43. RICCI AJ, CRAWFORD AC, FETTIPLACE R. Mechanisms of active hair bundle motion in auditory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 22:44-52, 2002.
44. ROBERTSON D, GUMMER M. Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 20:63-77, 1985.
45. SCHAIRER KS, FITZPATRICK D, KEFFE DH. Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:944-966, 2003.
46. SESTERHENN G, BREUNINGER H. The acoustic reflex at low sensation levels. Audiology 15:523-533, 1976.
47. SHERA CA, GUINAN JJ JR. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian oaes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:782-798, 1999.
48. SHERA CA, GUINAN JJ JR. Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2762-2772, 2003.
49. SIEGEL JH, KIM DO. Efferent control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical non-linearity. Hear. Res. 6:172-182, 1982.
50. SIMMONS FB. Post-tetanic potentiation in the middle-ear-muscle acoustic reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32:1589-1591, 1960.
51. SRIDHAR TS, LIBERMAN MC, BROWN MC, SEWELL WF. A novel cholinergic slow effect of olivocochlear stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig. J. Neurosci. 15:3667-3678, 1995.
52. STELMACHOWICZ PG, GORGA MP. Investigation of frequency specificity of acoustic reflex facilitation. Audiology 22:128-135, 1983.
53. TAVARTKILADZE GA, FROLENKOV GI, ARTAMASOV SV. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: the role of the medial olivocochlear system. Acta Oto-laryngol. 116:213-218, 1996.
54. THIERS FA, BURGESS BJ, NADOL JB JR. Axodendritic and dendrodendritic synapses within outer spiral bundles in a human. Hear. Res. 164:97-104, 2002a.
55. THIERS FA, BURGESS BJ, NADOL JB. Reciprocal innervation of outer hair cells in a human infant. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3:269-278, 2002b.
56. THORNTON N. Frequency analysis of the contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by narrow-band noise. Br. J. Audiol. 27:281-289, 1993.
57. VELENOVSKY D, GLATTKE T. The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 164:39-48, 2002.
58. VEUILLET E, COLLET L, DUCLAUX R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:724-735, 1991.
59. VEUILLET E, COLLET L, MORGON A. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear. Res. 61:47-55, 1992.
60. WARR WB (1992) Organization of olivocochlear efferent systems in mammals. Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neuroanatomy, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 410-448.
61. WHITEHEAD ML, MARTIN GK, LONSBURY-MARTIN BL. Effects of the crossed acoustic reflex on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in awake rabbits. Hear. Res. 51:55-72, 1991.
62. WIEDERHOLD ML, KIANG NYS. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48:950-965, 1970.
63. WILSON RH, MCBRIDE LM. Threshold and growth of the acoustic reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 631147-154, 1978.
64. ZWEIG G, SHERA CA. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:2018-2047, 1995.