Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans

Neuroscience

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 133-138

  Maison, S ^a   Micheyl, C ^a,b   Collet, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Cochlear micromechanics; Human; Medial olivocochlear system; Outer hair cells

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MIDDLE EAR; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE;

EID: 0032905935     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00608-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berlin C. I., Hood L. J., Szabo P., Cecola R. P., Rigby P., Jackson D. F. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 71:1993;1-11.
2. Bray P., Kemp D. T. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br. J. Audiol. 21:1987;191-204.
3. Burns E. M., Viemeister N. F. Nonspectral pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60:1976;863-868.
4. Cody A. R., Johnstone B. M. Acoustically evoked activity of single efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;280-282.
5. Collet L., Kemp D. T., Veuillet E., Duclaux R., Moulin A., Morgon A. Effects of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 43:1990;251-262.
6. Fex J. (1962) Auditory nerve activity in centrifugal and centripetal cochlear fibers in cat. A study of a feedback system. Acta physiol. scand. 55, Suppl. 189, 1-72.
7. Folsom R. L. and Owsley R. M. (1985) N1 action potentials in humans: influence of simultaneous contralateral stimulation. Acta otolar. 421, Suppl. 77-85.
8. Galambos R. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 19:1956;424-437.
9. Giraud A. L., Collet L., Chéry-Croze S., Magnan J., Chays A. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Res. 705:1995;15-23.
10. Guinan J. J., Gifford M. L. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. I. Rate-level functions. Hear. Res. 33:1988;97-114.
11. Guinan J. J., Gifford M. L. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. II. Spontaneous rate. Hear. Res. 33:1988;115-128.
12. Gummer M., Yates G. K., Johnstone B. M. Modulation transfer function of efferent neurons in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 36:1988;41-52.
13. Kawase T., Liberman M. C. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J. Neurophysiol. 70:1993;2519-2532.
14. Liberman M. C. Responses properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1988;1779-1798.
15. Liberman M. C. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear. Res. 39:1989;47-56.
16. Maison S., Micheyl C., Collet L. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude modulated tones. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;1759-1768.
17. Maison S., Micheyl C., Collet L. Contralateral frequency-modulated tones suppress transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear. Res. 117:1998;114-118.
18. May B. J., McQuone S. J. Effects of bilateral olivocochlear lesions on pure-tone intensity discrimination in cats. Audit. Neurosci. 1:1995;385-400.
19. Micheyl C., Collet L. Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 3:1996;1604-1610.
20. Micheyl C., Khalfa S., Perrot X. and Collet L. (1997) Difference in auditory efferent activity between musicians and non-musicians. NeuroReport (in press).
21. Mountain D. C. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science. 210:1980;71-72.
22. Patterson R. D., Johnson D. D., Milroy R. Amplitude modulated noise: the detection of modulation versus the detection of modulation rate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52:1978;1904-1911.
23. Puel J. L., Rebillard G. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:1990;1630-1635.
24. Rasmussen G. The olivary peduncle and other fibre projections of the superior olivary complex. J. comp. Neurol. 84:1946;141-219.
25. Siegel J. H., Kim D. O. Efferent control of cochlear mechanics. Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical non-linearity. Hear. Res. 6:1982;172-182.
26. Stevens K. N. and House A. S. (1972) Speech perception. In Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory (ed. Tobias J. V.), Vol. II. Academic, New York.
27. Veuillet E., Collet L., Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral auditory stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:1991;724-735.
28. Veuillet E., Collet L., Morgon A. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear. Res. 61:1992;47-55.
29. Viemeister N. F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66:1979;1364-1380.
30. Warr W. B., Guinan J. J. Jr and White J. S. (1986) Organization of the efferent fibers: the lateral and medial olivocochlear systems. In Neurobiology of Hearing. The Cochlea (eds Altschuler R. A., Hoffman D. W. and Bobbin R. P.), pp. 333-348. Raven, New York.
31. Winslow R. L., Sachs M. B. Single tone intensity discrimination based on auditory nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hear. Res. 35:1988;165-190.