Contralateral frequency-modulated tones suppress transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans

Hearing Research

Volumn 117, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 114-118

  Maison, Stéphane ^a   Micheyl, Christophe ^a   Collet, Lionel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Cochlear micromechanism; Frequency modulation; Human; Medial olivocochlear system; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE TRACT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY;

EID: 0031920709     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00213-X     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Hurley A.E., Wen H., Kemp D.T. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear. Res. 87:1995;96-103.
2. Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Wen H., Szabo P., Cecola R.P., Rigby P., Jackson D.F. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 71:1993;1-11.
3. Bray P., Kemp D.T. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br. J. Audiol. 21:1987;191-204.
4. Brownell W.E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 11:1990;82-92.
5. Buño W. Auditory nerve activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 59:1978;62-74.
6. Collet L., Kemp D.T., Veuillet E., Duclaux R., Moulin A., Morgon A. Effects of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 43:1990;251-262.
7. Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Phys. 12:1940;47-65.
8. Galambos R. Suppression of auditory-nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to the cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 19:1956;424-437.
9. Gifford M.L., Guinan J.J. Effects of electrical stimulation medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses. Hear. Res. 29:1987;179-194.
10. Giraud A.L., Collet L., Chéry-Croze S., Magnan J., Chays A. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Res. 705:1995;15-23.
11. Igirashi M., Cranford J.L., Allen E.A., Alford B.R. Behavioural auditory function after transection of crossed olivocochlear bundle in the cat. I. Pure-tone intensity discrimination. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.). 87:1979;429-433.
12. Kawase T., Liberman M.C. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J. Neurophysiol. 70:1993;2519-2532.
13. Liberman M.C. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1988;1779-1798.
14. Liberman M.C. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potential by contralateral sound. Hear. Res. 38:1989;47-56.
15. Maison S., Micheyl C., Collet L. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;1759-1768.
16. Maison S., Micheyl C., Chays A., Collet L. Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties. Hear. Res. 113:1997;89-98.
17. Maison, S., Micheyl, C., Andéol, G., Gallégo, S., Collet, L., submitted. What does activate medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans? Spectral aspects.
18. May B.J., McQuone S.J. Effects of bilateral olivocochlear lesions on pure-tone intensity discrimination in noise. Audit. Neurosci. 1:1995;385-400.
19. Micheyl C., Collet L. Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1996;1604-1610.
20. Micheyl C., Perrot X., Collet L. Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans. Behav. Neurosci. 111:1997;801-807.
21. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level and their use in calculating excitation patterns. Hear. Res. 28:1987;209-225.
22. Murata K., Moriyama T., Hosokawa Y., Minami S. Alternating current induced otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 55:1991;201-214.
23. Norman M., Thorton A.R.D. Frequency analysis of the contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by narrow-band noise. Br. J. Audiol. 27:1993;281-289.
24. Rajan R. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1988;549-568.
25. Reiter E.R., Liberman M.C. Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to 'slow effects' of olivocochlear stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 73:1995;506-514.
26. Ryan S., Kemp D.T., Hinchcliffe R. The influence of contralateral stimulation on otoacoustic emission responses in humans. Br. J. Audiol. 25:1991;391-397.
27. Saberi K., Hafter E.R. A common neural code for frequency- and amplitude-modulated sounds. Nature. 374:1995;537-539.
28. Scharf B., Magnan J., Chays A. On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies. Hear. Res. 103:1997;101-122.
29. Scharf B., Magnan J., Collet L., Ulmer E., Chays A. On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: a case study. Hear. Res. 75:1994;11-26.
30. Trahiotis C., Elliott D.N. Behavioral investigation of some possible effects of sectioning the crossed olivocochlear bundle. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 47:1968;592-596.
31. Veuillet E., Collet L., Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral auditory stimulation on active cochlear micomechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:1991;724-735.
32. Warr, W.B., Guinan, J.J. Jr., White, J.S., 1986. Organization of the efferent fibers: the lateral and medial olivocochlear systems. In: Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea (Altschuler, R.A., Hoffman, D.W., Bobbin, R.P., Eds.) pp. 333-348, Raven Press, New York.
33. Wiederhold M.L., Kiang N.Y.S. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48:1970;950-965.
34. Winslow R.L., Sachs M.B. Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hear. Res. 35:1988;165-190.