The hypothesis of immune testing of partners - Coordinated adaptations and changes in mating preferences

Biology Bulletin

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 205-215

  Markov, A V ^a   Kulikov, A M ^b  

^a PALEONTOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^b KOL TSOV INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744465812     PISSN: 10623590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S1062359006030010     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Amadou, C., Younger, R.M., Sims, S., Matthews, L.H., Rogers, J., Kumanovics, A., Ziegler, A., Beck, S., and Lindah, K.F., Co-Duplication of Olfactory Receptor and MHC Class I Genes in the Mouse Major Histocompatibility Complex, Hum. Mol. Genet., 2003, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 3025-3040.
2. Anholt, R.R. and Mackay, T.F., The Genetic Architecture of Odor-Guided Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster, Behav. Genet., 2001, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 7-27.
3. Anholt, R.R., Dilda, C.L., Chang, S., Fanara, J.J., Kulkarni, N.H., Ganguly, I., Rollmann, S.M., Kamdar, K.P., and Mackay, T.F., The Genetic Architecture of Odor-Guided Behavior in Drosophila: Epistasis and the Transcriptome, Nat. Genet., 2003, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 180-184.
4. Beynon, R.J. and Hurst, J.L., Urinary Proteins and the Modulation of Chemical Scents in Mice and Rats, Peptides, 2004, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1553-1563.
5. Brennan, P.A., The Nose Knows Who's Who: Chemosensory Individuality and Mate Recognition in Mice, Horm. Behav., 2004, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 231-240.
6. Bruce, H.M., An Exteroceptive Block to Pregnancy in the Mouse, Nature, 1959, vol. 184, p. 105.
7. Burnet, F.M., The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity, in The Abraham Flexner Lectures, 1958, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1959, pp. 49-80.
8. Cavaggioni, A., Mucignat, C., and Tirindelli, R., Pheromone Signalling in the Mouse: Role of Urinary Proteins and Vomeronasal Organ, Arch. Ital. Biol., 1999, vol. 137, nos. 2-3, pp. 193-200.
9. Dodd, D.M.B., Behavioral correlates of the adaptive divergence of Drosophila populations, Ph. D. Dissertation, New Haven: Yale Univ., 1984.
10. Dodd, D.M.B., Reproductive Isolation as a Consequence of Adaptive Divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Evolution, 1989, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1308-1311.
11. Eason, D.D., Cannon, J.P., Haire, R.N., Rast, J.P., Ostrov, D.A., and Litman, G.W., Mechanisms of Antigen Receptor Evolution, Sem. Immunol., 2004, vol. 16, pp. 215-226.
12. Feron, F., Mackay-Sim, A., Andrieu, J.L., Matthaei, K.I., Holley, A., and Sicard, G., Stress Induces Neurogenesis in Nonneuronal Cell Cultures of Adult Olfactory Epithelium, Neurosci., 1999, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 571-583.
13. Fisher, H.S., Swaisgood, R.R., and Fitch-Snyder, H., Odor Familiarity and Female Preferences for Males in a Threatened Primate, the Pygmy Loris Nycticebus pygmaeus: Applications for Genetic Management of Small Populations, Naturwissenschaften, 2003, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 509-512.
14. Frolov, A.N., Formation of Sexual Isolation Barriers in Corn Borer Ostrinia nubialis: Different Strategies of Plant Host Utilization, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1994, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 189-197.
15. Galaktionov, V.G., Ocherki evolyutsionnoi immunologii (Studies on Evolutionary Immunology), Moscow: Nauka, 1995.
16. Griffiths, S.W. and Armstrong, J.D., The Benefits of Genetic Diversity Outweigh Those of Kin Association in a Territorial Animal, Proc. Biol. Sci., 2001, vol. 268, no. 1473, pp. 1293-1296.
17. Halpern, M. and Martinez-Marcos, A., Structure and Function of the Vomeronasal System: An Update, Prog. Neurobiol., 2003, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 245-318.
18. Hardy, G.H., Mendelian Proportions in a Mixed Population, Science, 1908, vol. 28, pp. 49-50.
19. Hawthorne, D.J. and Via, S., Genetic Linkage of Ecological Specialization and Reproductive Isolation in Pea Aphids, Nature, 2001, vol. 412, no. 6850, pp. 904-907.
20. Hendry, A.P., Wenburg, J.K., Bentzen, P., Volk, E.C., and Quinn, T.P., Rapid Evolution of Reproductive Isolation in the Wild: Evidence from Introduced Salmon, Science, 2000, vol. 290, pp. 516-518.
21. Hurst, J.L., Payne, C.P., Nevison, C.M., Marie, A.D., Humphries, R.E., Robertson, D.H.L., Cavaggioni, A., and Beynon, R.J., Individual Recognition in Mice Mediated by Major Urinary Proteins, Nature, 2001, vol. 414, no. 6864, pp. 631-634.
22. Ishii, T., Hirota, J., and Mombaerts, P., Combinatorial Coexpression of Neural and Immune Multigene Families in Mouse Vomeronasal Sensory Neurons, Cur. Biol., 2003, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 394-400.
23. Jacob, S. and McClintock, M.K., Psychological State and Mood Effects of Steroidal Chemosignals in Women and Men, Horm. Behav., 2000, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-23.
24. Jordan, W.C. and Bruford, M.W., New Perspectives on Mate Choice and the MHC, Heredity, 1998, vol. 81, pp. 127-133.
25. Kaluev, A.V., Makarchuk, N.E., Deryagina, M.A., and Samokhvalov, V.P., Urinatsiva i povedenie (Urination and Behavior), Kiev: KSF, 2000.
26. Key, B. and John, J.St., Axon Navigation in the Mammalian Primary Olfactory Pathway: Where to Next?, Chem. Senses, 2002, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 245-260.
27. Kilias, G., Alahiotis, S.N., and Delecanos, M., A Multifactorial Investigation of Speciation Theory Using Drosophila melanogaster, Evolution, 1980, vol. 34, pp. 730-737.
28. Kirkpatrick, M. and Barton, N.H., The Strength of Indirect Selection on Female Mating Preferences, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1282-1286.
29. Kirkpatrick, M., Reinforcement during Ecological Speciation, Proc. Biol. Sci, 2001, vol. 268, no. 1473, pp. 1259-1263.
30. Korol, A., Rashkovetsky, E., Iliadi, K., Michalak, P., Ronin, Y., and Nevo, E., Nonrandom Mating in Drosophila melanogaster Laboratory Populations Derived from Closely Adjacent Ecologically Contrasting Slopes at "Evolution Canyon", Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, vol. 97, no. 23, pp. 12637-12642.
31. Kraaijeveld-Smit, F.J.L., Ward, S.J., Temple-Smith, P.D., and Paetkau, D., Factors Influencing Paternity Success in Antechinus agilis: Last-Male Sperm Precedence, Timing of Mating and Genetic Compatibility, J. Evol. Biol., 2002, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 100-107.
32. Leinders-Zufall, T., Brennan, P., Widmayer, P., Chandramani, P.S., Maul-Pavicic, A., Jager, M., Li, X.-H., Breer, H., Zufall, F., and Boehm, T., MHC Class I Peptides As Chemosensory Signals in the Vomeronasal Organ, Science, 2004, vol. 306, pp. 1033-1037.
33. Linn, C., Jr, FederJ.L., Nojima, S., Dambroski, H.R., Berlocher, S.H., and Roelofs, W., Fruit Odor Discrimination and Sympatric Host Race Formation in Rhagoletis, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, vol. 100, no. 20, pp. 11490-11493.
34. Lloyd-Thomas, A. and Keverne, E.B., Role of the Brain and Accessory Olfactory System in the Block to Pregnancy in Mice, Neurosci, 1982, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 907-913.
35. Loconto, J., Papes, F., Chang, E., Stowers, L., Jones, E.P., Takada, T., Kumanovics, A., Fischer-Lindahl, K., and Dulac, C., Functional Expression of Murine V2R Pheromone Receptors Involves Selective Association with the M10 and M1 Families of MHC Class Ib Molecules, Cell, 2003, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 607-618.
36. Makarchuk, N.E. and Kaluev, A.V., Obonyanie i povedenie (Smell and Behavior), Kiev: KSF, 2000.
37. Manning, C.J., Wakeland, E.K., and Potts, W.K., Communal Nesting Patterns in Mice Implicate MHC Genes in Kin Recognition, Nature, 1992, vol. 360, no. 6404, pp. 581-583.
38. Markow, T.A., Assortative Fertilization in Drosophila, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, no. 15, pp. 7756-7760.
39. Mays, H.L. and Hill, G.E., Choosing Mates: Good Genes versus Genes That Are a Good Fit, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2004, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 554-559.
40. Meredith, M., Vomeronasal Function, Chem. Senses, 1998, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 463-466.
41. Milinski, M., The Function of Mate Choice in Sticklebacks: Optimizing Mhc Genetics, J. Fish. Biol., 2003, vol. 63, suppl. A, pp. 1-16.
42. Milinski, M. and Wedekind, C., Evidence for MHC-Correlated Perfume Preferences in Humans, Behav. Ecol., 2001, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 140-149.
43. Milinski, M., Griffiths, S., Wegner, K.M., Reusch, T.B., Haas-Assenbaum, A., and Boehm, T., Mate Choice Decisions of Stickleback Females Predictably Modified by MHC Peptide Ligands, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, vol. 102, no. 12, pp. 4414-4418.
44. Mombaerts, P., Seven-Transmembrane Proteins as Odorant and Chemosensory Receptors, Science, 1999, vol. 286, no. 5440, pp. 707-711.
45. Montag, S., Frank, M., Ulmer, H., Wernet, D., Gopel, W., and Rammensee, H.-G., "Electronic Noise" Detects Major Histocompatibility Complex-Dependent Prerenal and Postrenal Odor Components, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, vol. 98, no. 16, pp. 9249-9254.
46. Ober, C., Weitkamp, L.R., Cox, N., Dytch, H., Kostyu, D., and Elias, S., HLA and Mate Choice in Humans, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1997, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 497-504.
47. Oliveira, A.L., Thams, S., Lidman, O., Piehl, F., Hokfelt, T., Karre, K., Linda, H., and Cullheim, S., A Role for MHC Class I Molecules in Synaptic Plasticity and Regeneration of Neurons after Axotomy, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, vol. 101, no. 51, pp. 17843-17848.
48. Palmer, J.A. and Palmer, L.K., Evolutionary Psychology: The Ultimate Origins of Human Behaviour, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
49. Translated under the title Evolyutsionnaya psikhologiya, St. Petersburg: Praim-Evroznak, 2003.
50. Perret, M. and Schilling, A., Sexual Responses to Urinary Chemosignals Depend on Photoperiod in a Male Primate, Physiol. Behav., 1995, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 633-639.
51. Porter, R. and Moore, J.D., Human Kin Recognition by Olfactory Cues, Physiol. Behav., 1981, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 493-495.
52. Porter, R., Cernoch, J., and Balogh, R., Odour Signatures and Kin Recognition, Physiol. Behav., 1985, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 445-448.
53. Potts, W.K., Manning, C.J., and Wakeland, E.K., Mating Patterns in Semi-Natural Populations of Mice Influenced by MHC Genotype, Nature, 1991, vol. 352, no. 6336, pp. 619-621.
54. Powell, J.R. and Anjelkovič, M., Population Genetics of Drosophila Amylase IV. Selection in Laboratory Populations Maintained on Different Carbohydrates, Genetics, 1983, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 675-689.
55. Rodriguez, I., Pheromone Receptors in Mammals, Horm. Behav., 2004, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 219-230.
56. Russel, M., Human Olfactory Communication, Nature, 1976, vol. 260, pp. 520-522.
57. Sapunov, V.B., Adaptation to Changing Ecological Conditions and Phenotype Variation in Aphids, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1983, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 557-567.
58. Schluter, D., Ecology and the Origin of Species, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2001, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 372-380.
59. Scott, K., Sex and the MHC, Dev. Cell, 2003, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 290-291.
60. Severtsov, A.S., Factors of Evolutionary Stasis, in Mater. 1-i mezhdunar. konf. "Bioraznoobrazie i dinamika ekosistem Severnoi Evrazii" (Proc. 1st Int. Conf. "Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics in Northern Eurasia"), 2000, Novosibirsk, 2000, http://evolution.powernet.ru/library/ resonsstat.html.
61. Shaposhnikov, G.Kh., Specificity and Emergence of Adaptation to New Hosts in Aphid (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) during Natural Selection, Entomol. Obozr., 1961, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 739-762.
62. Shaposhnikov, G.Kh., Morphological Divergence and Convergence in Experiments on Aphids (Homoptera, Aphidoidea), Entomol. Obozr., 1965, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3-25.
63. Shaposhnikov, G.Kh., Appearance and Loss of Reproductive Isolation and Species Criteria, Entomol. Obozr., 1966, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 3-35.
64. Singh, P.B., Chemosensation and Genetic Individuality, Reproduction, 2001, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 529-539.
65. Speca, D.J., Lin, D.M., Sorensen, P.W., Isakoff, E.Y., Ngai, J., and Dittman, A.H., Functional Identification of a Goldfish Odorant Receptor, Neuron, 1999, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 487-498.
66. Stricker, F.L., Y2K Man and Pheromonal Communication, Int. Electronic J. Dermopharmacological Res., Dermopharmaceutical Technol. Related Cosmetic Subjects, 2000, http://www.relata.info/does/Y2K_MAN.PDF.
67. Sullivan, S.L., Mammalian Chemosensory Receptors, Neuroreport, 2002, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. A9-A17.
68. Tatsura, H., Nagao, H., Tamada, A., Sasaki, S., Kohri, K., and Mori, K., Developing Germ Cells in Mouse Testis Express Pheromone Receptors, FEBS Lett., 2001, vol. 488, no. 3, pp. 139-144.
69. Thoday, J.M. and Gibson, J.B., Isolation by Disruptive Selection, Nature, 1962, vol. 193, pp. 1164-1166.
70. Thomas, L., Symbiosis as an Immunologic Problem, in The Immune System and Infectious Diseases, Neter, E. and Milgrom, S., Eds., Basel: S. Karger, 1975, pp. 2-11.
71. Wedekind, C. and Furi, S., Body Odour Preferences in Men and Women: Do They Aim for Specific MHC Combinations or Simply Heterozygosity?, Proc. R. Soc. Lond, 1997, vol. 264, no. 1378, pp. 1471-1479.
72. Wilkinson, G.S. and Reillo, P.R., Female Choice Response to Artificial Selection on an Exaggerated Male Trait in a Stalk-Eyed Fly, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 1994, vol. 255, no. 1342, pp. 1-6.
73. Wysocki, C.J., Yamazaki, K., Curran, M., Wysocki, L.M., and Beauchamp, G.K., Mice (Mus musculus) Lacking a Vomeronasal Organ Can Discriminate MHC-Determined Odortypes, Horm. Behav., 2004, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 241-246.
74. Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G.K., Kupniewski, D., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E.A., Familiar Imprinting Determines H-2 Selective Mating Preferences, Science, 1988, vol. 240, no. 4857, pp. 1331-1332.
75. Young, J.M., Shykind, B.M., Lane, R.P., Tonnes-Priddy, L., Ross, J.A., Walker, M., Williams, E.M., and Trask, B.J., Odorant Receptor Expressed Sequence Tags Demonstrate Olfactory Expression of over 400 Genes, Extensive Alternate Splicing and Unequal Expression Levels, Genome Biol., 2003, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. R71.1-R71.15.
76. Zhang, S.M., Adema, C.M., Kepler, T.B., and Loker, E.S., Diversification of Ig Superfamily Genes in An Invertebrate, Science, 2004, vol. 305, no. 5681, pp. 251-254.
77. Ziegler, A., Dohr, G., and Uchanska-Ziegler, B., Possible Roles for Products of Polymorphic MHC and Linked Olfactory Receptor Genes during Selection Process in Reproduction, Am. J. Reprod. Immunol., 2002, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 34-42.
78. Zufall, F., Kelliher, K.R., and Leinders-Zufall, T., Pheromone Detection by Mammalian Vomeronasal Neurons, Microsc. Res. Tech, 2002, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 251-260.