Maximizing the utility of interorganizational data using concept mapping

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 233-240

  Anthony, Mary K ^a   Higgins, Patricia A ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; CONCEPT FORMATION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OHIO; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33744456471     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200605000-00016     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Mark B, Burleson D. Measurement of patient outcomes: data availability and consistency across hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 1995;25:52-59.
2. Taunton R, Kleinbeck S, Stafford R, Woods C, Bott M. Patient outcomes. Are they linked to registered nurse absenteeism, separation or work load? J Nurs Adm. 1994; 24(4 suppl):48-55.
3. Koehler J, Miller K, Vojir C, Hester N, Foster R. Multisite clinical research: a challenge for nursing leaders. J Nurs Adm. 1997;27(7-8):42-48.
4. National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators. National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNI). Available at: http://www.nursingworld.org/ quality/database.htm. Accessed August 25, 2005.
5. American Nurses Association. ANA Continuing Education, Outcomes Measurement using the ANA Safety and Quality Measures page. Available at: http://www.nursingworld.org/ mods/working/QY/ceomfull.htm. Accessed November 21, 2003.
6. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Attributes of core performance measures and associated evaluation criteria page. Available at: http:// www.jcaho.org/pms/core+measures/attributes+of+core+ performance+measures.htm. Accessed August 6, 2004.
7. Bolton L, Aydin C, Donaldson N, Brown D, Nelson M, Harms D. Nurse staffing and patient perceptions of nursing care. J Nurs Adm. 2003;33:607-614.
8. Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1980.
9. Bond S, Thomas L. Measuring patients' satisfaction with nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17:52-63.
10. Greeneich D. The link between new and return business and quality of care: patient satisfaction. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1993;16:62-72.
11. Megivern K, Halm M, Jones G. Measuring patient satisfaction as an outcome of nursing care. J Nurs Care Qual. 1992;6(4):9-24.
12. American Nurses Association (ANA). Nursing Report Card for Acute Care Settings. Washington, DC: ANA; 1995. viii.
13. Blegen M, Goode C, Reed L. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Nurs Res. 1998;47:43-50.
14. Cleary P, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, et al. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991;10:254-267.
15. Moore K, Lynn M, McMillen B, Evans S. Implementation of the ANA report card. J Nurs Adm. 1999;29:48-54.
16. Sovie M, Jawad A. Hospital restructuring and its impact on outcomes: nursing staff regulations are premature. J Nurs Adm. 2001;31:588-600.
17. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520-528.
18. Press-Ganey. Press-Ganey page. Available at: http://www. pressganey.com. Accessed August 5, 2005.
19. Merkouris A, Yfantopoulos J, Lanara V, Lemonidou C. Developing an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nursing care in Greece. J Nurs Manag. 1999;7:91-100.
20. Jairath N, Fain J. A strategy for converting clinical data into research databases. Nurs Res. 1999;48:340-344.
21. de Ridder D, Depla M, Severens P, Malsch M. Beliefs on coping with illness: a consumer's perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:553-559.
22. Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989;12:1-16.
23. Baldwin C, Kroesen K, Trochim W, Bell I. Complementary and conventional medicine: a concept map. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004;4:2.
24. Irvine LMC. Can concept mapping be used to promote meaningful learning in nurse education? J Adv Nurs. 1995;21: 1175-1179.
25. Daley B, Shaw C, Balistrieri T, Glasenapp K, Piacentine L. Concept maps: a strategy to teach and evaluate critical thinking. J Nurs Educ. 1999;38:42-47.
26. Francisco J, Nakhleh M, Nurrenbern S, Miller M. Assessing student understanding of general chemistry with concept mapping. J Chem Educ. 2002;79:248-257.
27. Roberts L. Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 1999;30:707-717.
28. Pammer W, Haney M, Lmhc N, et al. Use of telehealth technology to extend child protection team services. Pediatrics. 2001;108:584-590.
29. van der Waal M, Casparie A, Lako C. Quality of care: a comparison of preferences between medical specialists and patients with chronic diseases. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:643-649.
30. Carpenter B, Van Haitsma K, Ruckdeschel K, Lawton M. The psychosocial preferences of older adults: a pilot examination of content and structure. Gerontologist. 2000;40:335-348.
31. Trochim W, Linton R. Conceptualization for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1986;9:289-308.
32. Anthony M, Brennan P, O'Brien R, Suwannaroop N. Measurement of nursing practice models using multiattribute utility theory: relationship to patient and organizational outcomes. Qual Manag Health Care. 2004;13:40-52.
33. Brennan P, Anthony M. Measuring nursing practice models using multi-attribute utility theory. Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:372-382.
34. Cleveland Health Quality Choice. Summary report: a summary of information. Cleveland-area hospital quality outcome measurements and patient satisfaction report. Cleveland, Ohio: Quality Information Management Corporation; 1995.
35. Neuhauser D, Harper D. Too good to last: did Cleveland health quality choice leave a legacy and lessons to be learned? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:202-203.
36. Dingman S, Williams M, Fosbinder D, Warnick M. Implementing a caring model to improve patient satisfaction. J Nurs Adm. 1999;29:30-37.
37. Hinshaw A, Atwood J. A patient satisfaction instrument: precision by replication. Nurs Res. 1982;31:170-175, 191.
38. Walsh M, Walsh A. Measuring patient satisfaction with nursing care: experience of using the newcastle satisfaction with nursing scale. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:307-315.
39. Wakefield D, Wakefield B, Borders T, Uden-Holman T, Blegen M, Vaughn T. Understanding and comparing differences in reported medication administration error rates. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:73-80.
40. Wakefield D, Wakefield B, Uden-Holman T, Borders T, Blegen M, Vaughn T. Understanding why medication administration errors may not be reported. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:81-88.
41. Wakefield B, Blegen M, Uden-Holman T, Vaughn T, Chrischilles E, Wakefield D. Organizational culture, continuous quality improvement, and medication administration error reporting. Am J Med Qual. 2001;16:128-134.
42. Werley HH, Lang NM. Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set. New York: Springer; 1988.