Complementary and conventional medicine: A concept map

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Baldwin, Carol M ^a,b   Kroesen, Kendall ^a   Trochim, William M ^c   Bell, Iris R ^a,d  

^a SOUTHERN ARIZONA VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; SELF CARE; SELF EVALUATION; TEACHER; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF CARE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2442650307     PISSN: 14726882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-4-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Astin JA: Why patients use alternative medicine. JAMA 1998, 279:1548-1553.
2. Astin JA, Pelletier KR, Marie A, Haskell WL: Complementary and alternative medicine use among elderly persons: one-year analysis of a Blue Shield Medicare supplement. J Gerontol 2000, 55A:M4-M9.
3. Baldwin CM, Long K, Kroesen K, Brooks AJ, Bell IR: A profile of military veterans in the southwestern United States who use complementary and alternative medicine. Arch Intern Med 2002, 162:1697-1704.
4. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC: Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998, 280:1569-1575.
5. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI, Kaptchuk TJ, Wilkey SA, Appel S, Davis RB: Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135:344-351.
6. Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, Van Rompay MI, Walters EE, Wilkey SA, Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM: Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2001, 135:262-268.
7. Kroesen K, Baldwin CM, Brooks AJ, Bell IR: US military veterans' perceptions of the conventional medical care system and their use of complementary and alternative medicine. Fam Prac 2002, 19:57-64.
8. Blaise R, Maiga A, Aboubacar A: How different are users and nonusers of alternative medicine? Can J Pub Health 1997, 88:159-162.
9. Millar WJ: Use of alternative health care practitioners by Canadians. Can J Pub Health 1997, 88:154-158.
10. Verhoef MJ, Russel ML, Love EG: Alternative medicine use in rural Alberta. Can J Public Health 1994, 85:308-309.
11. Bernstein JH, Shuval JT: Nonconventional medicine in Israel: consultation patterns of the Israeli population and attitudes of primary care physicians. Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:1341-1348.
12. Furnham A, Forey J: The attitudes, behaviors and beliefs of patients of conventional vs. complementary (alternative) medicine. J Clin Psychol 1994, 50:458-469.
13. Moore J, Phipps K, Marcer D: Why do people seek treatment by alternative medicine? BMJ 1985, 290:28-29.
14. Thomas KT, Carr J, Westlake L, Williams BT: Use of non-orthodox and conventional health care in Great Britain. BMJ 1991, 302:207-210.
15. Wootton JC, Sparber A: Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Alt Comp Med 2001, 7:195-208.
16. Bauman LJ, Adair EG: The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction. Health Ed Quar 1992, 19:9-23.
17. Hughes D, DuMont K: Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. Am J Com Psychol 1993, 21:775-806.
18. O'Brian K: Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art Volume 156. Edited by: Morgan DL. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1993:105-117.
19. Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative Research in Health Care London: BMJ Books; 2000.
20. Dillman D: Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1978.
21. Oppenheim AN: Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement New York: Basic Books; 1966.
22. Southern DM, Batterham RW, Appleby NH, Young D, Dunt K, Guibert R: The concept mapping method: an alternative to focus group inquiry in general practice. Aust Fam Phys 1999, 28:S35-S40.
23. Trochim WMK: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Prog Plan 1989, 12:1-16.
24. Wiener RL, Wiley D, Huelsman T, Hilgemann A: Combining qualitative interviews and concept mapping methodology. Eval Rev 1994, 18:227-240.
25. Eitel F, Kanz KG, Hortig E, Tesche A: Do we face a fourth paradigm shift in medicine - algorithms in education? J Eval Clin Prac 2000, 6:321-333.
26. Watson GR: What is⋯concept mapping? Med Teach 1989, 11:265-269.
27. Knish S, Calder P: Beliefs of chronic low back pain sufferers: a concept map. Can J Rehab 1999, 12:165-177.
28. Wolf J, Boevink W: Mapping the quality of life of people with severe and enduring mental health problems. Ment Health Care 1999, 2:228-231.
29. Carpenter BD, Van Haitsma K, Ruckdeschel K, Lawton MP: The psychosocial preferences of older adults: a pilot examination of content and structure. Gerontologist 2000, 40:335-348.
30. Trochim WMK, Linton R: Conceptualization for evaluation and planning. Eval Prog Plan 1986, 9:289-308.
31. Trochim WMK: Reliability of Concept Mapping Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Association, Dallas, Texas; 1993.
32. Glaser B, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.