Intereye Concordance in Locations of Visual Field Defects in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study

Ophthalmology

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 918-923

  Boden, Catherine ^a   Hoffmann, Esther M ^a   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a  

^a Hamilton Glaucoma Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33646936857     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lee A.J., Wang J.J., Rochtchina E., et al. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects in an older population. the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 31 (2003) 331-335
2. Fontana L., Armas R., Garway-Heath D.F., et al. Clinical factors influencing the visual prognosis of the fellow eyes of normal tension glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss. Br J Ophthalmol 83 (1999) 1002-1005
3. Chen P.P., and Park R.J. Visual field progression in patients with initially unilateral visual field loss from chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 1688-1692
4. Kass M.A., Kolker A.E., and Becker B. Prognostic factors in glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 94 (1976) 1274-1276
5. Susanna R., Drance S.M., and Douglas G.R. The visual prognosis of the fellow eye in uniocular chronic open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 62 (1978) 327-329
6. Chen P.P. Correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 2093-2099
7. Susanna Jr. R., and Galvao-Filho R.P. Study of the contralateral eye in patients with glaucoma and a unilateral perimetric defect. J Glaucoma 9 (2000) 34-37
8. Caprioli J., Sears M., and Miller J.M. Patterns of early visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma [letter]. Am J Ophthalmol 104 (1987) 98
9. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A., Cello K.E., et al. Classification of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 643-650
10. Caprioli J., Sears M., and Miller J.M. Patterns of early visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 103 (1987) 512-517
11. Heijl A., Lindgren G., and Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105 (1987) 1544-1549
12. Heijl A., Lindgren A., and Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 108 (1989) 130-135
13. Heijl A., Bengtsson B., and Patella V.M. Glaucoma follow-up when converting from long to short perimetric threshold tests. Arch Ophthalmol 118 (2000) 489-493
14. Henson D.B., Chaudry S., Artes P.H., et al. Response variability in the visual field. comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 417-421
15. Hutchings N., Wild J.M., Hussey M.K., et al. The long-term fluctuation of the visual field in stable glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 3429-3436
16. Hutchings N., Hosking S.L., Wild J.M., and Flanagan J.G. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 (2001) 2332-2337
17. Jacobs N.A., and Patterson I.H. Variability of the hill of vision and its significance in automated perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 69 (1985) 824-826
18. Katz J., and Sommer A. A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol 105 (1987) 1083-1086
19. Shirato S., Inoue R., Fukushima K., and Suzuki Y. Clinical evaluation of SITA. a new family of perimetric testing strategies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237 (1999) 29-34
20. Spry P.G., Johnson C.A., McKendrick A.M., and Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 (2001) 1404-1410
21. Artes P.H., Iwase A., Ohno Y., et al. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 2654-2659
22. Bengtsson B., Heijl A., and Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76 (1998) 165-169
23. Bengtsson B., and Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76 (1998) 268-272
24. Boden C., Blumenthal E.Z., Pascual J., et al. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria. Am J Ophthalmol 138 (2004) 1029-1036
25. Mikelberg F.S., and Drance S.M. The mode of progression of visual field defects in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 98 (1984) 443-445
26. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A., Quigg J.M., et al. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol 118 (2000) 1187-1194
27. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A., Levine R.A., et al. Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol 123 (2005) 1201-1206