Correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with open-angle glaucoma

Ophthalmology

Volumn 109, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 2093-2099

  Chen, Philip P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

CHRONIC DISEASE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0036839771     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01241-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:17-24.
2. Katz J. Two eyes or one? The data analyst's dilemma. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19:585-9.
3. Seal DV, Wright P, Ficker L, et al. Placebo controlled trial of fusidic acid gel and oxytetracycline for recurrent blepharitis and rosacea. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:42-5.
4. Gregor Z, Bird AC, Chisholm IH. Senile disciform macular degeneration in the second eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1977;61:141-7.
5. Chuang EL, Bird AC. Bilaterality of tears of the retinal pigment epithelium. Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:918-20.
6. Lavin MJ, Eldem B, Gregor ZJ. Symmetry of disciform scars in bilateral age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:133-6.
7. Grant WM, Burke JF Jr. Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology 1982;89:991-8.
8. Chen PP, Bhandari A. Fellow eye prognosis in patients with severe visual field loss in 1 eye from chronic open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:473-8.
9. Chen PP, Park RJ. Visual field progression in patients with initially unilateral visual field loss from chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1688-92.
10. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group [published erratum appears in Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:120]. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:487-97.
11. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-40.
12. Anderson DR. Automated Static Perimetry 1992. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1992;91-137.
13. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1445-55.
14. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: Full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1152-61.
15. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:125-9.
16. Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1999;1998-2009.
17. Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M. Comparison of the Humphrey Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies. J Glaucoma 2000;9:20-7.
18. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Patella VM. Glaucoma follow-up when converting from long to short perimetric threshold tests. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:489-93.
19. Shirato S, Inoue R, Fukushima K, Yasuyuki S. Clinical evaluation of SITA: A new family of perimetric testing strategies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:29-34.
20. Thomas R, Paul P, Muliyil J. Use of pattern standard deviation instead of corrected pattern standard deviation in Anderson's criteria. J Glaucoma 2000;9:480-2.
21. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race. Seven-year results. The AGIS Study Investigators. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1146-64.
22. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:19-22.
23. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2000;9:134-42.
24. Drance SM, Fairclough M, Butler DM, Kottler MS. The importance of disc haemorrhage in the prognosis of chronic open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:226-8.
25. Shihab ZM, Lee PF, Hay P. The significance of disc hemorrhage in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1982;89:211-3.
26. Bengtsson B. Optic disc haemorrhages preceding manifest glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990;68:450-4.
27. Diehl DL, Quigley HA, Miller NR, et al. Prevalence and significance of optic disc haemorrhage in a longitudinal study of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:545-50.
28. Hoyng PF, de Jong N, Oosting H, Stilma J. Platelet aggregation, disc haemorrhage and progressive loss of visual fields in glaucoma. A seven year follow-up study on glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 1992;16:65-73.
29. Siegner SW, Netland PA. Optic disc hemorrhages and progression of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1014-24.
30. Ishida K, Yamamoto T, Sugiyama K, Kitazawa Y. Disk hemorrhage is a significantly negative prognostic factor in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:707-14.
31. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Podhajsky P, Alward WLM. Nocturnal arterial hypotension and its role in optic nerve head and ocular ischemic disorders. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;117:603-24.
32. Graham SL, Drance SM, Wijsman K, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in glaucoma. The nocturnal dip. Ophthalmology 1995;102:61-9.
33. Yamazaki Y, Drance SM. The relationship between progression of visual field defects and retrobulbar circulation in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:287-95.
34. Gherghel D, Orgul S, Gugleta K, et al. Relationship between ocular perfusion pressure and retrobulbar blood flow in patients with glaucoma with progressive damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:597-605.
35. Kass MA, Meltzer DW, Gordon M, et al. Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:515-23.
36. Kass MA. Compliance and prognosis in glaucoma [editorial]. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:504.
37. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:165-9.
38. Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, et al. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1303-8.