Sonography of postexcision specimens of nonpalpable breast lesions: Value, limitations, and description of a method

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 186, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1014-1024

  Mesurolle, Benoît ^a   El Khoury, Mona ^a   Hori, David ^a   Phancao, Jean Pierre ^a   Kary, Salah ^a   Kao, Ellen ^a   Fleiszer, David ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer; Breast specimen; Mammography; Sonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; GUIDE WIRE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PALPATION; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR VOLUME; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPECIMEN HANDLING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 33646919227     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Shapiro S. Screening: assessment of current studies. Cancer 1994; 74:231-238
2. Homer MJ, Berlin L. Radiography of the surgical breast biopsy specimen. AJR 1998; 171:1197-1199
3. D'Orsi CJ. Management of the breast specimen. Radiology 1995; 194:297-302
4. Weyant M, Carroccio A, Tartter PI, et al. Determinants of success with spot localization biopsy of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181:521-524
5. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997; 204:677-684
6. Fornage BD, Ross MI, Singletary SE, Paulus DD. Localization of impalpable breast masses: value of sonography in the operating room and scanning of excised specimens. AJR 1994; 163:569-573
7. Frenna TH, Meyer JE, Sonnenfeld MR. US of breast biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994; 190:573
8. Staradub VL, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196:518-524
9. Homer MJ, Smith TJ, Safaii H. Prebiopsy needle localization: methods, problems, and expected results. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:139-153
10. Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:269-280
11. Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY Im JG. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:269-280, discussion 280-281
12. Stomper PC, Davis SP, Sonnenfeld MR, Meyer JE, Greenes RA, Eberlein TJ. Efficacy of specimen radiography of clinically occult noncalcified breast lesions. AJR 1988; 151:43-47
13. Liberman L, Goodstine SL, Dershaw DD, et al. One operation after percutaneous diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer: frequency and associated factors. AJR 2002; 178:673-679
14. Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, Moe RE, White E. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 86:628-637
15. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson IC. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA 1996; 275:913-918
16. Fourquet A, Campana F, Zafrani B, et al. Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in conservative management of early breast cancer: a 25-year follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989; 17:719-725
17. Dewar JA, Arriagada R, Benhamou S, et al. Local relapse and contralateral tumor rates in patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy (Institute Gustave Roussy 1970-1982). Cancer 1995; 76:2260-2265
18. Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 44:1005-1015
19. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1455-1461
20. Heimann R, Powers C, Halpem HJ, et al. Breast preservation in stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: the University of Chicago experience. Cancer 1996; 78:1722-1730
21. Faverly DR, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Breast carcinomas of limited extent: frequency, radiologic - pathologic characteristics, and surgical margin requirements. Cancer 2001; 91:647-659
22. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996; 223:688-700
23. Lee CH, Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR 1995; 164:81-86
24. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, et al. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR 1994; 162:33-36
25. Mai KT, Chaudhuri M, Perkins DG, Mirsky D. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens for duct carcinoma of the breast: correlation with core biopsy and mammographic findings. J Surg Oncol 2001; 78:189-193
26. Pain JA, Ebbs SR, Hern RPA, Lowe S, Bradbeer JW. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Eur J Surg Oncol 1992; 18:44-48
27. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, Rothschild I, Safaii H, Supran S. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002; 184:89-93
28. Lefor AT, Numann PJ, Levinsohn EM. Needle localization of occult breast lesions. Am J Surg 1984; 148:270-274
29. Bimston DN, Bebb GG, Wagman LD. Is specimen mammography beneficial? Arch Surg 2000; 135:1083-1086