Mammographically detected breast cancer: Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 223, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 688-700

  Yim, John H ^a   Barton, Premsri ^a   Weber, Beverly ^a   Radford, Diane ^a   Levy, Jerome ^a   Monsees, Barbara ^a   Flanagan, Fidelma ^a   Norton, Jeffrey A ^a   Doherty, Gerard M ^a  

^a BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0030002702     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199606000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish two-county trial. Cancer 1995; 75:2507-2517.
2. Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988; 167:353-358.
3. Cyrlak D. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. Radiology 1988; 168:661-663.
4. Sullivan DC. Needle core biopsy of mammographic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:601-608.
5. Kopans DB. Review of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results in nonpalpable breast lesions. Radiology 1993; 189:665-666.
6. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176:741-747.
7. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 181:745-750.
8. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-407.
9. Dronkers DJ. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology 1992; 183:631-634.
10. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993; 188:453-455.
11. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:815-820.
12. Mikhail RA, Nathan RC, Weiss M, et al. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of mammographic breast lesions as a viable alternative to surgical biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1994; 1:363-367.
13. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193: 359-364.
14. Cross MJ, Evans WP, Peters GN, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excisional biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2:195-200.
15. Pitre B, Baron PL, Baron LF, et al. Efficacy of stereotactic needle biopsy in the evaluation of mammographic abnormalities. Surg Forum 1995; 46:625-627.
16. Iorianni P, La Grenade A, Barr H, Manning DB. Correlation of stereotactic core breast biopsy with open biopsy-a study of 102 patients. Surg Forum 1995; 46:628-629.
17. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994; 193:91-95.
18. Schmidt RA. Stereotactic breast biopsy. CA Cancer J Clin 1994; 44:172-191.
19. Kaelin CM, Smith TJ, Homer MJ, et al. Safety, accuracy, and diagnostic yield of needle localization biopsy of the breast performed using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179:267-272.
20. Hasselgren P-O, Hummel RP, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery 1993; 114:836-842,
21. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS™). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995.
22. Evans WP. Fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Curr Opin Radiol 1992; 4:130-138.
23. Sickles EA, Parker SH. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions. Radiology 1993; 188: 315.
24. Mokbel K, Ahmed M, Nash A, Sacks N. Reexcision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 1995; 58:225-228.
25. Lee CH, Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiography of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:81-86.
26. Solin LJ, Fowble B, Martz K, et al. Results of re-excisional biopsy of the primary tumor in preparation for definitive irradiation of patients with early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986; 12:721-725.
27. Tafra L, Guenther JM, Guiliano AE. Planned segmentectomy: a necessity for breast carcinoma. Arch Surg 1993; 128:1014.
28. Ngai JH, Zelles GW, Rumore GJ, et al. Breast biopsy techniques and adequacy of margins. Arch Surg 1991; 126:1343-1347.
29. Cox CE, Reintgen DS, Nicosia SV, et al. Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy: an argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2:201-206.
30. Haner LP, Swengros-Curtis J, Ponto G, Craig PH. Malignant seeding of the needle track during stereotaxic core needle breast biopsy. Radiology 1992; 185:713-714.
31. Adler SJ. Stereotaxic core breast biopsy reduces the cost of diagnosing breast cancer by 38%. Radiology 1995; 197(P):203 (abstract).
32. Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1994; 190: 217-222.