Inflammatory, coagulatory and circulatory responses to logarithmic increases in the endotoxin dose in the anaesthetised pig

Journal of Endotoxin Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 99-112

  Lipcsey, Miklós ^a   Larsson, Anders ^a   Eriksson, Mats B ^a   Sjölin, Jan ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Animal model; Cytokines; Dose response relationship; Endotoxic shock; Pig

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; CREATININE; ENDOTOXIN; INTERLEUKIN 6; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ACID BASE BALANCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERIAL OXYGEN TENSION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINE RELEASE; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFLAMMATION; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG WEDGE PRESSURE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NONHUMAN; ORGAN BLOOD FLOW; OXYGEN TRANSPORT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SEPTIC SHOCK; SWINE; THROMBOCYTE COUNT; ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; BLOOD CLOTTING; BLOOD FLOW; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; DISEASE MODEL; DRUG EFFECT; HEMODYNAMICS; LEUKOCYTE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; THROMBOCYTE;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMALS; BLOOD COAGULATION; BLOOD PLATELETS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENDOTOXINS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; INFLAMMATION; INTERLEUKIN-6; LEUKOCYTES; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SWINE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA;

EID: 33646905092     PISSN: 09680519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/09680519060120020601     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Michie HR, Spriggs DR, Manogue KR et al. Tumor necrosis factor and endotoxin induce similar metabolic responses in human beings. Surgery 1988; 104: 280-286.
2. Goscinski G., Lundholm M., Odenholt I., Sjolin J. Variation in the propensity to release endotoxin after cefuroxime exposure in different gram-negative bacteria: Uniform and dose-dependent reduction by the addition of tobramycin. Scand J Infect Dis 2003; 35: 40-46.
3. Redl H., Bahrami S., Schlag G., Traber DL Clinical detection of LPS and animal models of endotoxemia. Immunobiology 1993; 187: 330-345.
4. Dodds WJ, Abelseth MK Criteria for selecting the animal to meet the research need. Lab Anim Sci 1980; 30: 460-465.
5. Schrauwen E., Cox E., Houvenaghel A. Escherichia coli sepsis and endotoxemia in conscious young pigs. Vet Res Commun 1988; 12: 295-303.
6. McMasters KM, Peyton JC, Hadjiminas DJ, Cheadle WG Endotoxin and tumour necrosis factor do not cause mortality from caecal ligation and puncture. Cytokine 1994; 6: 530-536.
7. Parker SJ, Watkins PE Experimental models of Gram-negative sepsis. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 22-30.
8. Fiorini RN, Shafizadeh SF, Polito C. et al. Anti-endotoxin monoclonal antibodies are protective against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in steatotic mice. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1567-1573.
9. Giacometti A., Cirioni O., Ghiselli R. et al. Antiendotoxin activity of protegrin analog IB-367 alone or in combination with piperacillin in different animal models of septic shock. Peptides 2003; 24: 1747-1752.
10. Goscinski G., Lipcsey M., Eriksson M., Larsson A., Tano E., Sjolin J. Endotoxin neutralization and anti-inflammatory effects of tobramycin and ceftazidime in porcine endotoxin shock. Crit Care 2004; 8: R35-R41.
11. Goldfarb RD, Nightingale LM, Kish P., Weber PB, Loegering DJ Left ventricular function during lethal and sublethal endotoxemia in swine. Am J Physiol 1986; 251: H364-H373.
12. Kurtz HJ, Quast J. Effects of continuous intravenous infusion of Escherichia coli endotoxin into swine. Am J Vet Res 1982; 43: 262-268.
13. Hand MS, Fettman MJ, Chandrasena LG, Cleek JL, Phillips RW Endotoxin dose. I. Hemodynamic, metabolic, and lethal consequences in Yucatan minipigs. Am J Physiol 1983; 244: E385-E398.
14. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M., Nielsen JB, Sjostrand UH, Edgren EL An experimental randomized study of five different ventilatory modes in a piglet model of severe respiratory distress. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18: 339-347.
15. Eriksson M., Larsson A., Lundkvist K., Loof L. Endotoxaemic liver injury in a porcine model - relation to tumour necrosis factor-alpha release and survival. Scand J Infect Dis 1998; 30: 169-172.
16. Carlstedt F., Eriksson M., Kiiski R., Larsson A., Lind L. Hypocalcemia during porcine endotoxemic shock: Effects of calcium administration. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 2909-2914.
17. Morrison PR, Meyer MP Constants for use in body surface area formula: mammals. In: Altman PL, Dittmer DS. (eds) Biology Data Book. Washington D.C.: Federation of American Society of Experimental Biology, 1964; 120-122.
18. Clark CA, Harman EM Hemodynamic monitoring: Pulmonary artery catheters. In: Civetta JM, Taylor RW, Kirby RR. (eds) Critical Care, 3 rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1988; 293-302.
19. Allen DG, Riviere JE, Monteiro-Riviere NA Cytokine induction as a measure of cutaneous toxicity in primary and immortalized porcine keratinocytes exposed to jet fuels, and their relationship to normal human epidermal keratinocytes. Toxicol Lett 2001; 119: 209-217.
20. Bergmann M., Gornikiewicz A., Tamandl D. et al. Continuous therapeutic epinephrine but not norepinephrine prolongs splanchnic IL-6 production in porcine endotoxic shock. Shock 2003; 20: 575-581.
21. Santak B., Radermacher P., Adler J. et al. Effect of increased cardiac output on liver blood flow, oxygen exchange and metabolic rate during long-term endotoxin-induced shock in pigs. Br J Pharmacol 1998; 124: 1689-1697.
22. Murphey ED, Traber DL Cardiopulmonary and splanchnic blood flow during 48 hours of a continuous infusion of endotoxin in conscious pigs: A model of hyperdynamic shock. Shock 2000; 13: 224-229.
23. Parrillo JE Pathogenetic mechanisms of septic shock. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1471-1477.
24. Thomas L., Good RA Studies on the generalized Shwartzman reaction: I. General observations concerning the phenomenon. J Exp Med 1952; 96: 605-624.
25. Fan H., Cook JA Molecular mechanisms of endotoxin tolerance. J Endotoxin Res 2004; 10: 71-84.
26. Annane D., Bellissant E., Cavaillon JM Septic shock. Lancet 2005; 365: 63-78.
27. Reeves JT, Daoud FS, Estridge M. Pulmonary hypertension caused by minute amounts of endotoxin in calves. J Appl Physiol 1972; 33: 739-743.
28. Wanecek M., Rudehill A., Hemsen A., Lundberg JM, Weitzberg E. The endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, in combination with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac, counteracts pulmonary hypertension in porcine endotoxin shock. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 848-857.
29. Asai K., Hiki N., Mimura Y., Ogawa T., Unou K., Kaminishi M. Gender differences in cytokine secretion by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Role of estrogen in modulating LPSinduced cytokine secretion in an ex vivo septic model. Shock 2001; 16: 340-343.
30. Losonczy G., Kriston T., Szabo A. et al. Male gender predisposes to development of endotoxic shock in the rat. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 47: 183-191.
31. Shanks N., McCormick CM, Meaney MJ Sex differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responding to endotoxin challenge in the neonate: Reversal by gonadectomy. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1994; 79: 260-266.