The modality effect in false recognition: Evidence for test-based monitoring

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1407-1413

  Pierce, Benton H ^a   Gallo, David A ^b   Weiss, Jonathan A ^c   Schacter, Daniel L ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE MEMORY; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; MONITORING; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; ATTENTION; DEFENSE MECHANISM; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PSYCHOMETRY; RECALL;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRESSION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33646849912     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193373     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ARNDT, J., & REDER, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 1-15.
2. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1-46.
3. BRAINERD, C. J., & REYNA, V. F. (1998). When things that were never experienced are easier to "remember" than things that were. Psychological Science, 9, 484-489.
4. BRAINERD, C. J., WRIGHT, R., REYNA, V. F., & PAYNE, D. G. (2002). Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 120-152.
5. DEESE, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
6. DODD, M. D., SHEARD, E. D., & MACLEOD, C. M. (2006). Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition. Memory, 14, 115-126.
7. DODSON, C. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2001). "If I had said it I would have remembered it": Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155-161.
8. DODSON, C. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2002). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 782-803.
9. EINSTEIN, G. O., & HUNT, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 588-598.
10. GALLO, D. A. (in press). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
11. GALLO, D. A., MCDERMOTT, K. B., PERCER, J. M., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 339-353.
12. GALLO, D. A., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2002). Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: Evidence for associative activation and monitoring. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 469-497.
13. HUNT, R. R., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
14. HUNT, R. R., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 421-445.
15. ISRAEL, L., & SCHACTER, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577-581.
16. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
17. JOHNSON, M. K., & RAYE, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
18. KELLOGG, R. T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 913-919.
19. KORIAT, A., & GOLDSMITH, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
20. MARSH, E. J., MCDERMOTT, K. B., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2004). Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories? Memory, 12, 44-55.
21. MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1997). Priming on perceptual implicit memory tests can be achieved through presentation of associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 582-586.
22. MCDERMOTT, K. B., & WATSON, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 160-176.
23. MCEVOY, C. L., NELSON, D. L., & KOMATSU, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1177-1194.
24. RAJARAM, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
25. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, BALOTA, D. A., & WATSON, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95-115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.
27. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B., PISONI, D. B., & GALLO, D. A. (2004). Illusory recollection of voices. Memory, 12, 586-602.
28. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, WATSON, J. M., MCDERMOTT, K. B., & GALLO, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385-407.
29. SCHACTER, D. L., CENDAN, D. L., DODSON, C. S., & CLIFFORD, E. R. (2001). Retrieval conditions and false recognition: Testing the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 827-833.
30. SCHACTER, D. L., ISRAEL, L., & RACINE, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 1-24.
31. SCHACTER, D. L., NORMAN, K. A., & KOUTSTAAL, W. (1998). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 289-318.
32. SCHACTER, D. L., & SLOTNICK, S. D. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion. Neuron, 44, 149-160.
33. SCHACTER, D. L., & WISEMAN, A. L. (in press). Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. In R. R. Hunt & J. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. SEAMON, J. G., LUO, C. R., SCHLEGEL, S. E., GREENE, S. E., & GOLDENBERG, A. B. (2000). False memory for categorized pictures and words: The category associates procedure for studying memory errors in children and adults. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 120-146.
35. SMITH, R. E., & HUNT, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 710-715.
36. SMITH, S. M., GERKENS, D. R., PIERCE, B. H., & CHOI, H. (2002). The roles of associative responses at study and semantically guided recollection at test in false memory: The Kirkpatrick and Deese hypotheses. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 436-447.
37. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.